Biomechanical analysis of mandibular cartilage defect regeneration after implantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and a platelet rich fibrin scaffold: an experimental animal study
Ni Putu Mira Sumarta , Surya Atmajaya , Olivia Jennifer Gunardi , Andra Rizqiawan , Coen Pramono Danudiningrat , Tengku Natasha Eleena binti Tengku Ahmad Noor
{"title":"Biomechanical analysis of mandibular cartilage defect regeneration after implantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and a platelet rich fibrin scaffold: an experimental animal study","authors":"Ni Putu Mira Sumarta , Surya Atmajaya , Olivia Jennifer Gunardi , Andra Rizqiawan , Coen Pramono Danudiningrat , Tengku Natasha Eleena binti Tengku Ahmad Noor","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Regenerative medicine is therapy that is expected to be effective for mandibular cartilage defect regeneration. Nevertheless, the biomechanical aspects of mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration are still rarely discussed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed too analyze the compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus in the mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration in an animal model after the implantation of <strong>human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (</strong>hUCMSC) and <strong>platelet rich fibrin</strong> (PRF) scaffolds. <strong>Materials and Methods</strong>: The defect were made on 80 New Zealand White Rabbit mandibular condyle cartilages and divided into four groups (three experimental and one control group). The experimental groups consisted of defects treated with implantations of PRF, hUCMSC, and hUCMSC with PRF. Each group consisted of 5 rats, observed for 4-weeks and then euthanized. Compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus tests were done with Universal Testing Machine. A comparative analysis was performed using SPSS v25 software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The hUCMSC group had a higher strength of compression (13,462 ± 0,889) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,000) and tensile strength (2723 ± 0,985) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,003) than the other groups. The average shear strength and elastic modulus showed that the hUCMSC (1162 ± 0,090 and 8700 ± 1502) and combination groups (0,728 ± 0,071 and 7742 ± 0,814) have significantly higher values than the other groups (p = 0,014 and p = 0,000).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The implantation of hUCMSC results in a high compression and tensile strength of the regenerated defect. The implantation of hUCMSC or hUCMSC seeded on a PRF scaffold is a novel method for mandible cartilage regeneration, and they showed better biomechanics in shear strength and elastic modulus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"15 6","pages":"Pages 1526-1533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825002222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Regenerative medicine is therapy that is expected to be effective for mandibular cartilage defect regeneration. Nevertheless, the biomechanical aspects of mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration are still rarely discussed.
Objective
This study aimed too analyze the compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus in the mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration in an animal model after the implantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSC) and platelet rich fibrin (PRF) scaffolds. Materials and Methods: The defect were made on 80 New Zealand White Rabbit mandibular condyle cartilages and divided into four groups (three experimental and one control group). The experimental groups consisted of defects treated with implantations of PRF, hUCMSC, and hUCMSC with PRF. Each group consisted of 5 rats, observed for 4-weeks and then euthanized. Compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus tests were done with Universal Testing Machine. A comparative analysis was performed using SPSS v25 software.
Results
The hUCMSC group had a higher strength of compression (13,462 ± 0,889) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,000) and tensile strength (2723 ± 0,985) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,003) than the other groups. The average shear strength and elastic modulus showed that the hUCMSC (1162 ± 0,090 and 8700 ± 1502) and combination groups (0,728 ± 0,071 and 7742 ± 0,814) have significantly higher values than the other groups (p = 0,014 and p = 0,000).
Conclusion
The implantation of hUCMSC results in a high compression and tensile strength of the regenerated defect. The implantation of hUCMSC or hUCMSC seeded on a PRF scaffold is a novel method for mandible cartilage regeneration, and they showed better biomechanics in shear strength and elastic modulus.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.