Optimizing Biogenic Silica Recovery from Diatoms: A Life Cycle Analysis of Surfactant and Bleach Treatments

IF 7.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sumit Dhali*, , , Farah Naaz, , , Anushree Malik, , , Satyawati Sharma, , , Ramesh Raliya, , and , Thilini U. Ariyadasa, 
{"title":"Optimizing Biogenic Silica Recovery from Diatoms: A Life Cycle Analysis of Surfactant and Bleach Treatments","authors":"Sumit Dhali*,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Farah Naaz,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Anushree Malik,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Satyawati Sharma,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Ramesh Raliya,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Thilini U. Ariyadasa,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c05457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The conventional acid and thermal treatments used for frustule recovery from diatom biomass are hazardous and unsustainable and may distort frustule structure. This is the first study to employ diatoms cultivated in domestic reverse osmosis reject wastewater for mesoporous biogenic silica production by investigating sustainable extraction routes using various surfactant types and bleach treatments at different concentrations. The highest organic matter removal of 81.68 ± 0.58% (w/w) was attained with a 4% (v/v) bleach treatment, while an 8% (v/v) anionic surfactant treatment yielded an organic matter removal of 81.62 ± 0.36% (w/w). The results have been confirmed through Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive spectroscopy, carbon–hydrogen–nitrogen analysis, and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis. FTIR peaks at 1109 cm<sup>–1</sup>, 1101 cm<sup>–1</sup>, and 3437 cm<sup>–1</sup> indicated silica in the extracted frustule. The bleach-treated frustules had mesoporous structure, exhibiting −17.6 ± 0.9 mV, 19 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>–1</sup>, and 31.99 ± 0.5 nm of surface charge, surface area, and average pore diameter, respectively. Life cycle assessment indicated that the bleach-cleaning process reduced the environmental impact by 99% compared to conventional acid treatment. Hence, this study presents a sustainable approach for extracting biogenic silica from diatoms, offering a greener alternative to conventional methods and reducing reliance on synthetic mesoporous silica.</p>","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"13 37","pages":"15447–15459"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c05457","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional acid and thermal treatments used for frustule recovery from diatom biomass are hazardous and unsustainable and may distort frustule structure. This is the first study to employ diatoms cultivated in domestic reverse osmosis reject wastewater for mesoporous biogenic silica production by investigating sustainable extraction routes using various surfactant types and bleach treatments at different concentrations. The highest organic matter removal of 81.68 ± 0.58% (w/w) was attained with a 4% (v/v) bleach treatment, while an 8% (v/v) anionic surfactant treatment yielded an organic matter removal of 81.62 ± 0.36% (w/w). The results have been confirmed through Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive spectroscopy, carbon–hydrogen–nitrogen analysis, and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis. FTIR peaks at 1109 cm–1, 1101 cm–1, and 3437 cm–1 indicated silica in the extracted frustule. The bleach-treated frustules had mesoporous structure, exhibiting −17.6 ± 0.9 mV, 19 m2 g–1, and 31.99 ± 0.5 nm of surface charge, surface area, and average pore diameter, respectively. Life cycle assessment indicated that the bleach-cleaning process reduced the environmental impact by 99% compared to conventional acid treatment. Hence, this study presents a sustainable approach for extracting biogenic silica from diatoms, offering a greener alternative to conventional methods and reducing reliance on synthetic mesoporous silica.

Abstract Image

从硅藻中优化生物源二氧化硅回收:表面活性剂和漂白剂处理的生命周期分析
传统的酸处理和热处理对硅藻生物量的回收是有害的,不可持续的,并且可能会扭曲结构。本研究首次利用国内反渗透废水中培养的硅藻进行介孔生物二氧化硅生产,研究了不同表面活性剂类型和不同浓度漂白剂处理的可持续提取路线。当漂白剂浓度为4% (v/v)时,有机物去除率最高,为81.68±0.58% (w/w);当阴离子表面活性剂浓度为8% (v/v)时,有机物去除率最高,为81.62±0.36% (w/w)。结果已通过傅里叶变换红外光谱、热重分析、场发射扫描电镜、能量色散光谱、碳-氢-氮分析和布鲁诺尔-埃米特-泰勒分析得到证实。在1109 cm-1、1101 cm-1和3437 cm-1处的FTIR峰表明,提取柱中含有二氧化硅。经漂白处理的微晶块具有介孔结构,其表面电荷、表面积和平均孔径分别为- 17.6±0.9 mV、19 m2 g-1和31.99±0.5 nm。生命周期评估表明,与常规酸处理相比,漂白清洗过程减少了99%的环境影响。因此,本研究提出了一种从硅藻中提取生物源二氧化硅的可持续方法,为传统方法提供了一种更环保的替代方案,并减少了对合成介孔二氧化硅的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信