Cheng Chen , Binquan Li , Huiming Zhang , Maihuan Zhao , Zhongmin Liang , Kuang Li , Xindai An
{"title":"Uncertainty-informed multi-reservoir flood control optimization: A probabilistic forecasting and stochastic decision-making framework","authors":"Cheng Chen , Binquan Li , Huiming Zhang , Maihuan Zhao , Zhongmin Liang , Kuang Li , Xindai An","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forecast uncertainty is a critical factor influencing the risk associated with reservoir flood control operations. Traditional assumptions of Gaussian-distributed forecast residuals often fail to capture their variability, leading to challenges in risk assessment and decision-making. To address this issue, this study developed a stochastic inflow scenario generation algorithm that accounts for heteroscedastic residuals and coupled it with an NSGA-III-based reservoir optimization model. Furthermore, a decision-making approach integrating the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method was employed to perform multi-objective decision-making, taking into account the fuzziness of decision preferences. The proposed framework was tested on a parallel reservoir system located in the lower reaches of the Yellow River Basin, China. The key findings are as follows: (1) Forecast residual behavior exhibits significant variability across different flow magnitudes. (2) The conventional assumption of Gaussian-distributed forecast residuals underestimates flood uncertainty and its associated risks, particularly during extreme flood events. (3) Incorporating forecast uncertainty into reservoir flood control operations enhances risk mitigation in multi-reservoir systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"663 ","pages":"Article 134285"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425016257","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forecast uncertainty is a critical factor influencing the risk associated with reservoir flood control operations. Traditional assumptions of Gaussian-distributed forecast residuals often fail to capture their variability, leading to challenges in risk assessment and decision-making. To address this issue, this study developed a stochastic inflow scenario generation algorithm that accounts for heteroscedastic residuals and coupled it with an NSGA-III-based reservoir optimization model. Furthermore, a decision-making approach integrating the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method was employed to perform multi-objective decision-making, taking into account the fuzziness of decision preferences. The proposed framework was tested on a parallel reservoir system located in the lower reaches of the Yellow River Basin, China. The key findings are as follows: (1) Forecast residual behavior exhibits significant variability across different flow magnitudes. (2) The conventional assumption of Gaussian-distributed forecast residuals underestimates flood uncertainty and its associated risks, particularly during extreme flood events. (3) Incorporating forecast uncertainty into reservoir flood control operations enhances risk mitigation in multi-reservoir systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.