Resilience analysis from the perspective of global container shipping network evolution: Fine-grained modeling based on AIS data

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jihong Chen , Houqiang Jiang , Jinyu Xu , Chuan Pang , Jia Shi , Zhijia Tan
{"title":"Resilience analysis from the perspective of global container shipping network evolution: Fine-grained modeling based on AIS data","authors":"Jihong Chen ,&nbsp;Houqiang Jiang ,&nbsp;Jinyu Xu ,&nbsp;Chuan Pang ,&nbsp;Jia Shi ,&nbsp;Zhijia Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global container shipping network serves as a key pillar of international trade, yet frequent sudden disruptions, such as public health crises and geopolitical conflicts, pose significant challenges to its stability and resilience. To gain deeper insights into the network's evolutionary characteristics under these disruptions, this study constructs fine-grained global container shipping networks on both monthly and weekly time scales, based on AIS trajectory data spanning 2019 to 2022 and supplemented by static port attributes. By computing metrics including node strength and centrality, and visualizing changes in port node strength worldwide, we analyze the network's dynamic evolution under the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia–Ukraine conflict, and the Suez Canal blockage. The results reveal that the network exhibits small-world and scale-free characteristics, with a few key ports maintaining core positions despite the disruptions. During the early stages of the pandemic, the average node strength dropped by approximately 45 %, reflecting the network's vulnerability. However, it quickly rebounded to about 91.6 % in the short term, demonstrating the network's notable recovery capacity. The Russia–Ukraine conflict significantly affected several ports and related routes in the Black Sea region, but its impact on global major hubs was relatively limited. In contrast, the Suez Canal blockage caused severe short-term disturbances to the network structure, yet the network largely recovered within two weeks. Based on these findings, we further propose differentiated policy recommendations for port authorities and shipping operators, offering empirical support and practical governance insights to enhance the responsiveness and recovery capacity of the shipping network under various types of disruptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104415"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325003060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global container shipping network serves as a key pillar of international trade, yet frequent sudden disruptions, such as public health crises and geopolitical conflicts, pose significant challenges to its stability and resilience. To gain deeper insights into the network's evolutionary characteristics under these disruptions, this study constructs fine-grained global container shipping networks on both monthly and weekly time scales, based on AIS trajectory data spanning 2019 to 2022 and supplemented by static port attributes. By computing metrics including node strength and centrality, and visualizing changes in port node strength worldwide, we analyze the network's dynamic evolution under the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia–Ukraine conflict, and the Suez Canal blockage. The results reveal that the network exhibits small-world and scale-free characteristics, with a few key ports maintaining core positions despite the disruptions. During the early stages of the pandemic, the average node strength dropped by approximately 45 %, reflecting the network's vulnerability. However, it quickly rebounded to about 91.6 % in the short term, demonstrating the network's notable recovery capacity. The Russia–Ukraine conflict significantly affected several ports and related routes in the Black Sea region, but its impact on global major hubs was relatively limited. In contrast, the Suez Canal blockage caused severe short-term disturbances to the network structure, yet the network largely recovered within two weeks. Based on these findings, we further propose differentiated policy recommendations for port authorities and shipping operators, offering empirical support and practical governance insights to enhance the responsiveness and recovery capacity of the shipping network under various types of disruptions.
全球集装箱航运网络演化视角下的弹性分析:基于AIS数据的细粒度建模
全球集装箱航运网络是国际贸易的重要支柱,但公共卫生危机和地缘政治冲突等突发事件频繁发生,对其稳定性和复原力构成重大挑战。为了更深入地了解这些中断下网络的演化特征,本研究基于2019年至2022年的AIS轨迹数据,并以静态港口属性为补充,在每月和每周的时间尺度上构建了细粒度的全球集装箱运输网络。通过计算节点强度和中心性等指标,并对全球范围内港口节点强度的变化进行可视化分析,分析了2019冠状病毒病大流行、俄罗斯-乌克兰冲突和苏伊士运河堵塞情况下港口网络的动态演变。结果表明,该网络具有小世界和无标度特征,尽管受到干扰,但少数关键端口仍保持核心位置。在大流行的早期阶段,平均节点强度下降了约45%,反映了网络的脆弱性。但短期内迅速回升至91.6%左右,显示出网络恢复能力显著。俄乌冲突严重影响了黑海地区的几个港口和相关航线,但对全球主要枢纽的影响相对有限。相比之下,苏伊士运河的堵塞对网络结构造成了严重的短期干扰,但网络在两周内基本恢复。基于这些发现,我们进一步为港口当局和航运运营商提出了差异化的政策建议,提供实证支持和实用的治理见解,以提高航运网络在各种类型中断下的响应能力和恢复能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信