Comparative efficacy and safety of anakinra and canakinumab in patients with VEXAS syndrome - an international multicenter study.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare differences in clinical response, drug survival, and adverse event rates between anakinra and canakinumab in VEXAS syndrome. METHODS This multicenter international study includes VEXAS patients from France, Israel, and Italy treated with IL1 inhibition (IL1i). Global response (GR) was defined as the absence of inflammatory symptoms, 50% or greater decrease in steroid dose and C-reactive protein. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify associated variables. Drug survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank test, with Cox-regression models for associated factors. RESULTS We included 47 male VEXAS patients; 44 received anakinra, and 9 received canakinumab, with 6 patients using both at different time points. GR at 1 month was 34% for anakinra and 100% for canakinumab (p<0.001), 22% and 78% at 3 months, respectively (p=0.001). Treatment with canakinumab was associated with higher odds ratio (OR) of achieving GR at 3 months (OR 28.8, 95%CI 3·0-273·9, p=0.004) in a multivariable analysis. Median drug survival was 54 (30-56) months for canakinumab at 300 mg/month, compared to 7 (4-8) months for canakinumab 150 mg/month and 1 (1-2.5) months for anakinra (p=0.01). Injection site reactions were only recorded for the anakinra group (47 vs 0%; p=0.006), whereas infections were more frequent in the anakinra group (31% and 11%; p=0·3). CONCLUSIONS Canakinumab demonstrated superior clinical response and drug survival with fewer adverse events compared to anakinra. Monthly Canakinumab 300 mg may be considered as an effective steroid-sparing therapeutic option for VEXAS patients.