Evaluation of a strategy to enhance the efficacy and ease of application of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccines

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Antonella Schiavone , Jane C. Edwards , Easha Vigneswaran , Rory C.F. De Brito , Harkeerat Hothi , Jean-Pierre Frossard , E. Sam Beechener , Jay G. Calvert , Christine Tait Burkard , Monica Balasch , Andrew V. Seaton , Mark Stevens , M. Keith Howard , Simon P. Graham , Tanja Opriessnig
{"title":"Evaluation of a strategy to enhance the efficacy and ease of application of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccines","authors":"Antonella Schiavone ,&nbsp;Jane C. Edwards ,&nbsp;Easha Vigneswaran ,&nbsp;Rory C.F. De Brito ,&nbsp;Harkeerat Hothi ,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Frossard ,&nbsp;E. Sam Beechener ,&nbsp;Jay G. Calvert ,&nbsp;Christine Tait Burkard ,&nbsp;Monica Balasch ,&nbsp;Andrew V. Seaton ,&nbsp;Mark Stevens ,&nbsp;M. Keith Howard ,&nbsp;Simon P. Graham ,&nbsp;Tanja Opriessnig","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSV) is sometimes hindered by the suboptimal immunogenicity and efficacy of existing vaccines. In addition, not following vaccine storage and administration conditions on-farm can negatively impact on the efficacy of current vaccines and present barriers to the development of more efficacious vaccination strategies. To address these challenges, we evaluated whether a ‘prime and pull’ immunisation strategy combining a prime with a ‘needle-free’ solid dose formulation of modified live PRRSV-1 vaccine (MLV), and a nasal boost with inactivated PRRSV-1 administered by an automated jet device can enhance protection against challenge infection. Forty-five, 4-week-old, PRRSV naïve, piglets were divided into 5 groups; including a benchmark group (10 pigs, vaccinated with a liquid MLV delivered by intramuscular injection), a prime only group (10 pigs vaccinated with the solid dose MLV), a prime/pull group (10 pigs vaccinated with the solid dose MLV and boosted 3 weeks later by nasal inoculation with inactivated MLV), an unvaccinated challenge control group (10 pigs) and a naïve group (5 pigs, without vaccination and PRRSV challenge). Pigs were challenged with a PRRSV-1 field strain 35 days post-vaccination and necropsied 10 days post-challenge. PRRSV viremia and nasal shedding were inferred by RT-qPCR, and antibody responses were assessed in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage by ELISA and virus neutralisation test. Whilst the nasal inactivated vaccine boost failed to augment efficacy, the solid dose vaccine provided neutralising antibody responses and protection (reduced viremia, virus shedding and gross lung lesions) comparable to the standard needle and syringe inoculation of PRRSV MLV suspension. These data support the further development of the solid dose formulation technology as a practical alternative to conventional delivery of PRRSV MLV and other vaccines to pigs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 127757"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25010540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSV) is sometimes hindered by the suboptimal immunogenicity and efficacy of existing vaccines. In addition, not following vaccine storage and administration conditions on-farm can negatively impact on the efficacy of current vaccines and present barriers to the development of more efficacious vaccination strategies. To address these challenges, we evaluated whether a ‘prime and pull’ immunisation strategy combining a prime with a ‘needle-free’ solid dose formulation of modified live PRRSV-1 vaccine (MLV), and a nasal boost with inactivated PRRSV-1 administered by an automated jet device can enhance protection against challenge infection. Forty-five, 4-week-old, PRRSV naïve, piglets were divided into 5 groups; including a benchmark group (10 pigs, vaccinated with a liquid MLV delivered by intramuscular injection), a prime only group (10 pigs vaccinated with the solid dose MLV), a prime/pull group (10 pigs vaccinated with the solid dose MLV and boosted 3 weeks later by nasal inoculation with inactivated MLV), an unvaccinated challenge control group (10 pigs) and a naïve group (5 pigs, without vaccination and PRRSV challenge). Pigs were challenged with a PRRSV-1 field strain 35 days post-vaccination and necropsied 10 days post-challenge. PRRSV viremia and nasal shedding were inferred by RT-qPCR, and antibody responses were assessed in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage by ELISA and virus neutralisation test. Whilst the nasal inactivated vaccine boost failed to augment efficacy, the solid dose vaccine provided neutralising antibody responses and protection (reduced viremia, virus shedding and gross lung lesions) comparable to the standard needle and syringe inoculation of PRRSV MLV suspension. These data support the further development of the solid dose formulation technology as a practical alternative to conventional delivery of PRRSV MLV and other vaccines to pigs.
提高猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒疫苗效力和应用便利性的策略评价。
猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)的控制有时因现有疫苗的免疫原性和效力不理想而受阻。此外,不遵守农场的疫苗储存和管理条件可能对现有疫苗的效力产生负面影响,并对制定更有效的疫苗接种战略构成障碍。为了应对这些挑战,我们评估了一种“启动和拉动式”免疫策略,该策略将启动与改良PRRSV-1活疫苗(MLV)的“无针”固体剂量配方相结合,以及由自动喷射装置给药的灭活PRRSV-1鼻强化是否可以增强对攻击感染的保护。4周龄PRRSV naïve仔猪45头,随机分为5组;包括基准组(10头猪,通过肌肉注射接种了液体MLV),仅初始组(10头猪接种了固体剂量MLV),初始/拉组(10头猪接种了固体剂量MLV, 3周后通过鼻接种灭活MLV增强),未接种攻毒组(10头猪)和naïve组(5头猪,不接种疫苗和PRRSV攻毒)。接种后35天用PRRSV-1野毒株攻毒,攻毒后10天死猪。采用RT-qPCR检测PRRSV病毒血症和鼻腔脱落,ELISA和病毒中和试验检测血清和支气管肺泡灌洗液抗体反应。虽然鼻用灭活疫苗增强剂未能增强效力,但固体剂量疫苗可提供中和抗体反应和保护(减少病毒血症、病毒脱落和大体肺病变),与PRRSV MLV悬浮液的标准针头和注射器接种相当。这些数据支持进一步开发固体剂量制剂技术,作为传统给猪PRRSV、MLV和其他疫苗的实用替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信