{"title":"Feasibility of Chin Wing Osteotomy: Can it be considered a routine procedure in orthognathic surgery?","authors":"S Silvestri, M Savoini, M Bonaso, P Asperio","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Chin Wing osteotomy represents a choice of alternative genioplasty, well described in literature but until today slightly used, mainly due to the greater risk of damage to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) related compared to the classic genioplasty. The study aims to better analyze the rate of nerve damage and its real impact on the patient's daily life. A retrospective study of 26 patients who underwent to BSSO in a first stage without IAN sensitivity disturbs reported and chin wing genioplasty in a second stage, between 2019 and 2024 was performed. A total of 23 patients were included and subdivided in two groups: 10 patients underwent BSSO+ mini Chin wing osteotomy (Group B), 13 patients underwent BSSO+ complete Chin Wing osteotomy (Group A). We analyzed rates of IAN damage by using some clinical neurosensory at least 12 months after surgery testing lower lip and chin area residual sensitivity for each group. We also analyzed patients' quality of life after chin wing osteotomy by using a subjective questionnaire and life quality questionnaire (OHIP-14) administered at the patient's 1 year follow up appointment. There was 72% recovery in Group A and 70 % recovery in Group B after 1 year follow up. Only for two-point discrimination and tactile sensitivity significant difference between anterior and complete chin wing osteotomy was found: slight better sensitivity after mini wing osteotomy. The sensibility of IAN discreetly preserved and which does not interfere with quality of life. Excellent patient satisfaction from a functional and aesthetic point of view was reached.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Chin Wing osteotomy represents a choice of alternative genioplasty, well described in literature but until today slightly used, mainly due to the greater risk of damage to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) related compared to the classic genioplasty. The study aims to better analyze the rate of nerve damage and its real impact on the patient's daily life. A retrospective study of 26 patients who underwent to BSSO in a first stage without IAN sensitivity disturbs reported and chin wing genioplasty in a second stage, between 2019 and 2024 was performed. A total of 23 patients were included and subdivided in two groups: 10 patients underwent BSSO+ mini Chin wing osteotomy (Group B), 13 patients underwent BSSO+ complete Chin Wing osteotomy (Group A). We analyzed rates of IAN damage by using some clinical neurosensory at least 12 months after surgery testing lower lip and chin area residual sensitivity for each group. We also analyzed patients' quality of life after chin wing osteotomy by using a subjective questionnaire and life quality questionnaire (OHIP-14) administered at the patient's 1 year follow up appointment. There was 72% recovery in Group A and 70 % recovery in Group B after 1 year follow up. Only for two-point discrimination and tactile sensitivity significant difference between anterior and complete chin wing osteotomy was found: slight better sensitivity after mini wing osteotomy. The sensibility of IAN discreetly preserved and which does not interfere with quality of life. Excellent patient satisfaction from a functional and aesthetic point of view was reached.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.