Exploring the interactions of athletes and their social support network following sport-related concussion.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Alexandra Repper, Makine Boukhari, Lorelie Roderbourg, Jeffrey G Caron
{"title":"Exploring the interactions of athletes and their social support network following sport-related concussion.","authors":"Alexandra Repper, Makine Boukhari, Lorelie Roderbourg, Jeffrey G Caron","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2558885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on social support following sport-related concussion (SRC) has largely been examined from the athlete perspective. This qualitative study explored social support interactions during recovery following SRC. We conducted semi-structured interviews with six athletes and 16 individuals who were identified as being part of the athletes' social support network (e.g., teammates, friends, or family members). All 22 participants in this study completed a timeline mapping activity, which allowed participants to share details about the athletes' SRC recovery, including the type and timing of support provided and received. Using thematic analysis, we found three themes. First, we found that social support was optimal when perceptions of social support were aligned (e.g., delivery and perceived impact on recovery). Second, we found several instances where challenges arose in the social support relationships, often stemming from incongruent perspectives (e.g., expectations and perceptions of support differed). Third, members of the support network described some of the barriers they faced when attempting to provide social support to athletes. Overall, these results add to the literature by demonstrating the good (aligned perspectives), the bad (incoherent perspectives), and the challenges with the social support relationships following SRC from the perspective of athletes and members of their support network.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2558885","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on social support following sport-related concussion (SRC) has largely been examined from the athlete perspective. This qualitative study explored social support interactions during recovery following SRC. We conducted semi-structured interviews with six athletes and 16 individuals who were identified as being part of the athletes' social support network (e.g., teammates, friends, or family members). All 22 participants in this study completed a timeline mapping activity, which allowed participants to share details about the athletes' SRC recovery, including the type and timing of support provided and received. Using thematic analysis, we found three themes. First, we found that social support was optimal when perceptions of social support were aligned (e.g., delivery and perceived impact on recovery). Second, we found several instances where challenges arose in the social support relationships, often stemming from incongruent perspectives (e.g., expectations and perceptions of support differed). Third, members of the support network described some of the barriers they faced when attempting to provide social support to athletes. Overall, these results add to the literature by demonstrating the good (aligned perspectives), the bad (incoherent perspectives), and the challenges with the social support relationships following SRC from the perspective of athletes and members of their support network.

探讨运动相关脑震荡后运动员及其社会支持网络的相互作用。
体育相关脑震荡(SRC)后社会支持的研究主要是从运动员的角度进行的。本定性研究探讨了SRC术后恢复过程中社会支持的相互作用。我们对6名运动员和16名被确定为运动员社会支持网络成员的个人(如队友、朋友或家庭成员)进行了半结构化访谈。在这项研究中,所有22名参与者都完成了一个时间表绘制活动,该活动允许参与者分享运动员SRC恢复的细节,包括提供和接受支持的类型和时间。通过主题分析,我们发现了三个主题。首先,我们发现当社会支持的感知是一致的(例如,交付和感知对恢复的影响)时,社会支持是最佳的。其次,我们发现了社会支持关系中出现挑战的几个例子,这些挑战通常源于不一致的观点(例如,对支持的期望和看法不同)。第三,支持网络的成员描述了他们在试图为运动员提供社会支持时面临的一些障碍。总的来说,这些结果通过从运动员及其支持网络成员的角度展示SRC后社会支持关系的好(一致的观点)、坏(不连贯的观点)和挑战,为文献提供了补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信