Association of Lifetime Psychiatric Comorbidity and Current Substance Use in Methadone-Treated Individuals with Opioid Use Disorders.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
M Gabriela Barbaglia, Javier Molero-Calafell, Ariadna Angulo-Brunet, Saül Alcaraz, Montse Bartroli, Joan I Mestre-Pintó
{"title":"Association of Lifetime Psychiatric Comorbidity and Current Substance Use in Methadone-Treated Individuals with Opioid Use Disorders.","authors":"M Gabriela Barbaglia, Javier Molero-Calafell, Ariadna Angulo-Brunet, Saül Alcaraz, Montse Bartroli, Joan I Mestre-Pintó","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2025.2557191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to assess the association between psychiatric comorbidity and current substance use in a sample of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) with methadone in outpatient drug treatment centers. Secondary objectives were: (a) to examine the associations between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and specific substance use (opioids, cocaine, alcohol, cannabis), and (b) to identify the socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with substance use based on lifetime psychiatric comorbidity status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of 588 patients (20% women; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> 48.4) was recruited from eight outpatient drug treatment centers in Catalonia (Spain), which offer a comprehensive treatment approach. Dual diagnosis was assessed using the Dual Disorder Screening Interview (DDSI), and self-reported substance use (opioids, cocaine, cannabis, and alcohol) was evaluated through a specific questionnaire. Poisson regression with a log link was used to test five models adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63.5% of the patients tested positive for a lifetime dual diagnosis, and 83.5% reported substance use in the past month. No increased likelihood of opioid, cocaine, or alcohol use was observed among those with a lifetime dual diagnosis, except for cannabis use (<i>PR</i> = 1.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychiatric comorbidity was not associated with current substance use in methadone-treated patients, except cannabis use. The observed patterns may be influenced by the pharmacological effects of methadone and the comprehensive treatment approach provided to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2557191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to assess the association between psychiatric comorbidity and current substance use in a sample of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) with methadone in outpatient drug treatment centers. Secondary objectives were: (a) to examine the associations between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and specific substance use (opioids, cocaine, alcohol, cannabis), and (b) to identify the socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with substance use based on lifetime psychiatric comorbidity status.

Methods: A convenience sample of 588 patients (20% women; Mage 48.4) was recruited from eight outpatient drug treatment centers in Catalonia (Spain), which offer a comprehensive treatment approach. Dual diagnosis was assessed using the Dual Disorder Screening Interview (DDSI), and self-reported substance use (opioids, cocaine, cannabis, and alcohol) was evaluated through a specific questionnaire. Poisson regression with a log link was used to test five models adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables.

Results: A total of 63.5% of the patients tested positive for a lifetime dual diagnosis, and 83.5% reported substance use in the past month. No increased likelihood of opioid, cocaine, or alcohol use was observed among those with a lifetime dual diagnosis, except for cannabis use (PR = 1.29).

Conclusions: Psychiatric comorbidity was not associated with current substance use in methadone-treated patients, except cannabis use. The observed patterns may be influenced by the pharmacological effects of methadone and the comprehensive treatment approach provided to patients.

在美沙酮治疗的阿片类药物使用障碍患者中,终生精神共病与当前物质使用的关系。
目的:本研究的主要目的是评估在门诊药物治疗中心接受阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者样本中精神共病与当前药物使用之间的关系。次要目标是:(a)检查社会人口学和临床特征与特定物质使用(阿片类药物、可卡因、酒精、大麻)之间的关联,以及(b)根据终生精神合并症状况确定与物质使用相关的社会人口学和临床因素。方法:从加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)提供综合治疗方法的8个门诊药物治疗中心招募588例患者(20%为女性,48.4%)作为方便样本。使用双重障碍筛查访谈(DDSI)评估双重诊断,并通过特定问卷评估自我报告的物质使用(阿片类药物,可卡因,大麻和酒精)。使用带对数链接的泊松回归来检验针对社会人口学、临床和治疗变量调整的五个模型。结果:63.5%的患者终生双重诊断呈阳性,83.5%的患者报告在过去一个月内使用过药物。除了大麻使用(PR = 1.29)外,在终身双重诊断的患者中,没有观察到阿片类药物、可卡因或酒精使用的可能性增加。结论:除大麻使用外,美沙酮治疗患者的精神共病与当前物质使用无关。观察到的模式可能受到美沙酮的药理作用和提供给患者的综合治疗方法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信