Jing Shen, Na Ye, Yuqi Zhang, Chenxi Liu, Weijie Li, Xinli Zhou
{"title":"Optimization of mouse oocyte vitrification through microencapsulation in sodium alginate hydrogel.","authors":"Jing Shen, Na Ye, Yuqi Zhang, Chenxi Liu, Weijie Li, Xinli Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03673-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vitrification (ice-free) is considered more effective than slow freezing for oocyte cryopreservation. However, high concentrations of toxic cryoprotective agents (CPAs) are typically required, followed by multi-step washing to remove CPAs, risking osmotic shock and impairing oocytes development. This study aimed to establish a hydrogel encapsulation strategy using a microfluidic system to improve vitrification outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three different sizes of oocyte-loaded sodium alginate hydrogel microspheres (OHMs) (~ 262 µm, ~ 193 µm, and ~ 156 µm) were prepared using an optimized three-channel microfluidic system. The effects of particle size, vitrification solutions (VS1, VS2, VS3, and VS4), CPA loading durations (4, 8, and 12 min), and warming/dilution procedures (one-step, two-step, and three-step) on oocyte vitrification were systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OHMs with a particle size of 262 µm, loaded with VS3 (containing 10% DMSO) for 8 min and subjected to the two-step warming and dilution procedure, achieved excellent post-thaw survival (91.98%), cleavage (75.84%), and blastocyst rates (23.86%). The survival rate was comparable to that of the Cryotop group vitrified with 15% DMSO (91.81%), while the cleavage and blastocyst rates were significantly higher than those of the Cryotop group (67.42% and 20.03%, respectively). Besides, OHMs resulted in minimal oocyte volume changes upon CPA loading (minimum normalized volume of 0.8739) compared to the Cryotop multi-step method (0.4396).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the Cryotop carrier method, the microfluidic hydrogel microcapsule technique reduces CPA concentration, shortens loading time, and minimizes osmotic injury. This approach provides a promising strategy for fertility preservation and may be extended to other biological samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03673-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Vitrification (ice-free) is considered more effective than slow freezing for oocyte cryopreservation. However, high concentrations of toxic cryoprotective agents (CPAs) are typically required, followed by multi-step washing to remove CPAs, risking osmotic shock and impairing oocytes development. This study aimed to establish a hydrogel encapsulation strategy using a microfluidic system to improve vitrification outcomes.
Methods: Three different sizes of oocyte-loaded sodium alginate hydrogel microspheres (OHMs) (~ 262 µm, ~ 193 µm, and ~ 156 µm) were prepared using an optimized three-channel microfluidic system. The effects of particle size, vitrification solutions (VS1, VS2, VS3, and VS4), CPA loading durations (4, 8, and 12 min), and warming/dilution procedures (one-step, two-step, and three-step) on oocyte vitrification were systematically evaluated.
Results: OHMs with a particle size of 262 µm, loaded with VS3 (containing 10% DMSO) for 8 min and subjected to the two-step warming and dilution procedure, achieved excellent post-thaw survival (91.98%), cleavage (75.84%), and blastocyst rates (23.86%). The survival rate was comparable to that of the Cryotop group vitrified with 15% DMSO (91.81%), while the cleavage and blastocyst rates were significantly higher than those of the Cryotop group (67.42% and 20.03%, respectively). Besides, OHMs resulted in minimal oocyte volume changes upon CPA loading (minimum normalized volume of 0.8739) compared to the Cryotop multi-step method (0.4396).
Conclusions: Compared with the Cryotop carrier method, the microfluidic hydrogel microcapsule technique reduces CPA concentration, shortens loading time, and minimizes osmotic injury. This approach provides a promising strategy for fertility preservation and may be extended to other biological samples.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.