Exploring Consumer Responses to AI-Generated Visual Marketing Content: A Dual-Process Theory Perspective

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Chunfeng Chen, Depeng Zhang, Lu Zhu, Fenghua Zhang
{"title":"Exploring Consumer Responses to AI-Generated Visual Marketing Content: A Dual-Process Theory Perspective","authors":"Chunfeng Chen,&nbsp;Depeng Zhang,&nbsp;Lu Zhu,&nbsp;Fenghua Zhang","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>With the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) content generation tools, companies are increasingly utilizing AI to create visual marketing content. However, research on how consumer responses to AI-generated content differ from those to human-generated content remains limited. Based on the dual-process theory, this research examines the impact of three types of visual content creators—AI creators, human-AI co-creators, and human creators—on consumer responses. An online experiment involving 450 consumers evaluated their reactions to visual marketing content labeled with different creator information. The findings indicate that content generated by AI creators elicits greater emotional arousal among consumers compared to content generated by human-AI co-creators or exclusively by human creators. Moreover, content generated by AI or co-created by humans and AI is perceived as requiring less effort from companies, yet it conveys a greater perception of company innovation ability than content created solely by humans. These types of content creators indirectly influence consumer attitudes toward the content and their perceptions of product premiumness. This effect is mediated by emotional arousal, perceived company effort, and perceived company innovation ability. As one of the early studies exploring the effects of AI-generated visual content in marketing, this research offers novel insights into the psychological mechanisms underlying consumer responses—based on evaluations of both the content and the company's strategic approach.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"49 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) content generation tools, companies are increasingly utilizing AI to create visual marketing content. However, research on how consumer responses to AI-generated content differ from those to human-generated content remains limited. Based on the dual-process theory, this research examines the impact of three types of visual content creators—AI creators, human-AI co-creators, and human creators—on consumer responses. An online experiment involving 450 consumers evaluated their reactions to visual marketing content labeled with different creator information. The findings indicate that content generated by AI creators elicits greater emotional arousal among consumers compared to content generated by human-AI co-creators or exclusively by human creators. Moreover, content generated by AI or co-created by humans and AI is perceived as requiring less effort from companies, yet it conveys a greater perception of company innovation ability than content created solely by humans. These types of content creators indirectly influence consumer attitudes toward the content and their perceptions of product premiumness. This effect is mediated by emotional arousal, perceived company effort, and perceived company innovation ability. As one of the early studies exploring the effects of AI-generated visual content in marketing, this research offers novel insights into the psychological mechanisms underlying consumer responses—based on evaluations of both the content and the company's strategic approach.

探索消费者对人工智能生成的视觉营销内容的反应:双过程理论视角
随着人工智能(AI)内容生成工具的进步,企业越来越多地利用人工智能来创建视觉营销内容。然而,关于消费者对人工智能生成内容的反应与人类生成内容的反应有何不同的研究仍然有限。基于双过程理论,本研究考察了三种类型的视觉内容创造者——人工智能创造者、人类-人工智能共同创造者和人类创造者——对消费者反应的影响。一项涉及450名消费者的在线实验评估了他们对标记有不同创作者信息的视觉营销内容的反应。研究结果表明,与人类与人工智能共同创作者或完全由人类创作者创作的内容相比,人工智能创作者创作的内容在消费者中引发了更大的情感唤醒。此外,由人工智能生成或由人类和人工智能共同创建的内容被认为对公司的工作量较少,但它比仅由人类创建的内容更能传达公司创新能力的感知。这些类型的内容创作者间接影响消费者对内容的态度和他们对产品溢价的看法。这种效应受情绪唤醒、感知企业努力和感知企业创新能力的中介作用。作为探索人工智能生成的视觉内容在营销中的影响的早期研究之一,这项研究基于对内容和公司战略方法的评估,为消费者反应的心理机制提供了新颖的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信