Evaluation of the Performance of HighResMIP CMIP6 in Simulating Extreme Precipitation in Madagascar

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Mirindra Finaritra Rabezanahary Tanteliniaina, Zhai Jun, Mihasina Harinaivo Andrianarimanana
{"title":"Evaluation of the Performance of HighResMIP CMIP6 in Simulating Extreme Precipitation in Madagascar","authors":"Mirindra Finaritra Rabezanahary Tanteliniaina,&nbsp;Zhai Jun,&nbsp;Mihasina Harinaivo Andrianarimanana","doi":"10.1002/joc.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study assesses the performance of 17 High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) from the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) and their ensemble mean in simulating extreme precipitation in Madagascar. For this purpose, nine extreme precipitation indices were used, namely consecutive dry days (CDD), consecutive wet days (CWD), heavy precipitation days (R10mm), very heavy precipitation days (R20mm), simple daily intensity (SDII), maximum 1-day precipitation (RX1day), maximum 5-day precipitation (RX5day), very wet days (R95P) and extremely wet days (R99p). Furthermore, two gridded data sets, the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS) and ERA5, were employed as the reference data. The performance of the models was assessed using Normalised Root Mean Squared Error (NRMSE), percentage of bias (PBIAS) and Taylor Skill Score (TSS). In addition, this study used a comprehensive model ranking (MR) to provide an inclusive assessment of the models. The results suggest that most HighResMIP models fairly reproduce the precipitation climatology in Madagascar. We also found that except for the simulation of R99P, most of the models have satisfactorily good results in simulating extreme precipitation indices over the study area. A further comparison between HighResMIP models and their CMIP6 counterparts showed that most of the high-resolution models have better performance; yet improving model parametrization is still important. In line with previous research, by crossing the results from CHIRPS and ERA5, we found that the multi-model mean outperformed individual models. Nevertheless, individual models such as HadGEM3-GC31-HH, HadGEM3-GC31-HM, ECMWF-IFS-HR and EC-Earth3P-HR have relatively good results. On the contrary, the worst performance is attributed to HIRAM-SIT-LR and INM-CM5-h. The outputs and results from this research deliver a comprehensive assessment of the performance of the new HighResMIP in simulating precipitation extremes at a local study, which are essential for policymakers and climate modellers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":"45 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.70011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the performance of 17 High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) from the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) and their ensemble mean in simulating extreme precipitation in Madagascar. For this purpose, nine extreme precipitation indices were used, namely consecutive dry days (CDD), consecutive wet days (CWD), heavy precipitation days (R10mm), very heavy precipitation days (R20mm), simple daily intensity (SDII), maximum 1-day precipitation (RX1day), maximum 5-day precipitation (RX5day), very wet days (R95P) and extremely wet days (R99p). Furthermore, two gridded data sets, the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS) and ERA5, were employed as the reference data. The performance of the models was assessed using Normalised Root Mean Squared Error (NRMSE), percentage of bias (PBIAS) and Taylor Skill Score (TSS). In addition, this study used a comprehensive model ranking (MR) to provide an inclusive assessment of the models. The results suggest that most HighResMIP models fairly reproduce the precipitation climatology in Madagascar. We also found that except for the simulation of R99P, most of the models have satisfactorily good results in simulating extreme precipitation indices over the study area. A further comparison between HighResMIP models and their CMIP6 counterparts showed that most of the high-resolution models have better performance; yet improving model parametrization is still important. In line with previous research, by crossing the results from CHIRPS and ERA5, we found that the multi-model mean outperformed individual models. Nevertheless, individual models such as HadGEM3-GC31-HH, HadGEM3-GC31-HM, ECMWF-IFS-HR and EC-Earth3P-HR have relatively good results. On the contrary, the worst performance is attributed to HIRAM-SIT-LR and INM-CM5-h. The outputs and results from this research deliver a comprehensive assessment of the performance of the new HighResMIP in simulating precipitation extremes at a local study, which are essential for policymakers and climate modellers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

HighResMIP CMIP6模拟马达加斯加极端降水的性能评价
本研究评估了来自耦合模式比对项目第6阶段(CMIP6)的17个高分辨率模式比对项目(HighResMIP)及其集合平均值在模拟马达加斯加极端降水中的表现。为此,采用了连续干旱日数(CDD)、连续潮湿日数(CWD)、强降水日数(R10mm)、甚强降水日数(R20mm)、简单日强度(SDII)、最大1天降水(RX1day)、最大5天降水(RX5day)、极湿日数(R95P)和极湿日数(R99p) 9个极端降水指标。以气候灾害组红外降水(CHIRPS)和ERA5两个网格数据集作为参考数据。使用归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)、偏差百分比(PBIAS)和泰勒技能分数(TSS)评估模型的性能。此外,本研究使用综合模型排名(MR)来提供模型的包容性评估。结果表明,大多数HighResMIP模式较好地再现了马达加斯加的降水气候学。除R99P外,大部分模式对研究区极端降水指数的模拟结果均较好。HighResMIP模型与CMIP6模型的进一步比较表明,大多数高分辨率模型具有更好的性能;然而,改进模型参数化仍然很重要。与之前的研究一致,通过交叉CHIRPS和ERA5的结果,我们发现多模型均值优于单个模型。然而,个别模型如HadGEM3-GC31-HH、HadGEM3-GC31-HM、ECMWF-IFS-HR和EC-Earth3P-HR的结果相对较好。相反,性能最差的是HIRAM-SIT-LR和INM-CM5-h。这项研究的产出和结果对新的HighResMIP在模拟极端降水方面的表现进行了全面评估,这对政策制定者和气候建模者至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信