{"title":"Optimizing Cannabis Sample Preparation to Reduce Chloroform Usage: A Comparison of I-Optimal, D-Optimal, and A-Optimal Designs","authors":"Chaowalit Monton, Laksana Charoenchai, Jirapornchai Suksaeree, Thanapat Songsak","doi":"10.1002/jssc.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to identify a safer solvent system to reduce toxic chloroform usage, consisting of a mixture of acetonitrile, methanol, and water, for the preparation of cannabis samples. A comparison among I-optimal, D-optimal, and A-optimal experimental designs for Charlotte's Angel and Hang Kra Rog Phu Phan cultivars was conducted. Results indicated that the I-optimal and D-optimal designs exhibited similar contour plot patterns and design spaces, which differed from those of the A-optimal design. The optimal solvent mixture that maximized both cannabidiol and ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol for both cultivars was acetonitrile:methanol:water in the ratio 0.571:0.0890:0.340, demonstrating that this safer mixture performed comparably to the standard methanol:chloroform (9:1) system. The cannabidiol and ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol contents extracted using the optimal mixture were not significantly different from those obtained with the chloroform-containing system, confirming its effectiveness. Furthermore, during a 28-day study period, cannabidiol and ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol stored at 4 and -20°C remained stable, with no significant differences observed. In conclusion, the I-optimal design effectively optimized the cannabis sample preparation using a safer solvent mixture, reducing chloroform usage while maintaining comparable extraction efficiency and stable cannabinoid content.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify a safer solvent system to reduce toxic chloroform usage, consisting of a mixture of acetonitrile, methanol, and water, for the preparation of cannabis samples. A comparison among I-optimal, D-optimal, and A-optimal experimental designs for Charlotte's Angel and Hang Kra Rog Phu Phan cultivars was conducted. Results indicated that the I-optimal and D-optimal designs exhibited similar contour plot patterns and design spaces, which differed from those of the A-optimal design. The optimal solvent mixture that maximized both cannabidiol and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol for both cultivars was acetonitrile:methanol:water in the ratio 0.571:0.0890:0.340, demonstrating that this safer mixture performed comparably to the standard methanol:chloroform (9:1) system. The cannabidiol and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol contents extracted using the optimal mixture were not significantly different from those obtained with the chloroform-containing system, confirming its effectiveness. Furthermore, during a 28-day study period, cannabidiol and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol stored at 4 and -20°C remained stable, with no significant differences observed. In conclusion, the I-optimal design effectively optimized the cannabis sample preparation using a safer solvent mixture, reducing chloroform usage while maintaining comparable extraction efficiency and stable cannabinoid content.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.