Modelling the Consequences of Domestication-Introgression in Wild Populations Using Genetic Markers Under Varying Degrees of Selection

IF 3.2 2区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
K. A. Glover, M. Castellani, M. Heino, F. Besnier
{"title":"Modelling the Consequences of Domestication-Introgression in Wild Populations Using Genetic Markers Under Varying Degrees of Selection","authors":"K. A. Glover,&nbsp;M. Castellani,&nbsp;M. Heino,&nbsp;F. Besnier","doi":"10.1111/eva.70140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Introgression of domesticated genomes influences the evolutionary trajectory of wild populations. Genetic markers are used to quantify admixture in wild populations subjected to introgression from non-native conspecifics. However, markers can be under direct and indirect selection which may influence admixture estimates and quantification of fitness consequences thereafter. We expanded the Atlantic salmon eco-genetic model IBSEM to compute individual fish phenotype and domestication admixture using markers under variable strengths of selection. Following 50 years of 5%–25% domesticated conspecifics on the spawning grounds, the recipient wild population showed an increase in adult size at age and a decline in adult abundance, both of which scaled with the degree of intrusion. In the following 50-year recovery period without further escapees, traits started to but did not completely revert to pre-impact levels. Neutral and weakly selected markers gave higher admixture estimates than markers under stronger degrees of selection. The disparity increased during the recovery period where neutral markers and their corresponding admixture estimates “lingered” in the wild population, whereas admixture based on markers under selection declined as the population recovered. During the recovery period, the strength in the relationship between individual fish admixture and size at age was also eroded when computed using neutral markers, but less so for the markers under selection. Collectively, these observations illustrate how markers under selection mirror the fitness and phenotypic changes in the population, while neutral markers reflect demographic history and can therefore not be uncritically used to infer fitness consequences. Our results also suggest that management guidelines used in Norway and some other countries, setting 10% domesticated escapees in a river and/or 10% domestication admixture in wild populations as the limit for a “large” impact, will provide a high level of protection for wild salmon populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":168,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Applications","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eva.70140","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Applications","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eva.70140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introgression of domesticated genomes influences the evolutionary trajectory of wild populations. Genetic markers are used to quantify admixture in wild populations subjected to introgression from non-native conspecifics. However, markers can be under direct and indirect selection which may influence admixture estimates and quantification of fitness consequences thereafter. We expanded the Atlantic salmon eco-genetic model IBSEM to compute individual fish phenotype and domestication admixture using markers under variable strengths of selection. Following 50 years of 5%–25% domesticated conspecifics on the spawning grounds, the recipient wild population showed an increase in adult size at age and a decline in adult abundance, both of which scaled with the degree of intrusion. In the following 50-year recovery period without further escapees, traits started to but did not completely revert to pre-impact levels. Neutral and weakly selected markers gave higher admixture estimates than markers under stronger degrees of selection. The disparity increased during the recovery period where neutral markers and their corresponding admixture estimates “lingered” in the wild population, whereas admixture based on markers under selection declined as the population recovered. During the recovery period, the strength in the relationship between individual fish admixture and size at age was also eroded when computed using neutral markers, but less so for the markers under selection. Collectively, these observations illustrate how markers under selection mirror the fitness and phenotypic changes in the population, while neutral markers reflect demographic history and can therefore not be uncritically used to infer fitness consequences. Our results also suggest that management guidelines used in Norway and some other countries, setting 10% domesticated escapees in a river and/or 10% domestication admixture in wild populations as the limit for a “large” impact, will provide a high level of protection for wild salmon populations.

Abstract Image

利用遗传标记模拟不同选择程度下野生种群驯化-渐渗的结果
驯化基因组的渗入影响野生种群的进化轨迹。遗传标记用于量化外来同种种渗入的野生种群的混合。然而,标记可能受到直接和间接的选择,这可能会影响适应性结果的混合估计和量化。我们扩展了大西洋鲑鱼生态遗传模型IBSEM,利用不同选择强度下的标记来计算个体鱼的表型和驯化混合。经过50年5% ~ 25%的驯化后,在产卵场的野生种群中,随入侵程度的增加,成年个体的大小增加,而成年个体的丰度下降。在接下来的50年的恢复期中,没有进一步的逃逸,特征开始恢复到影响前的水平,但没有完全恢复到影响前的水平。中性和弱选择的标记比强选择的标记给出了更高的混合估计。在恢复期间,中性标记及其相应的外源估计在野生种群中“徘徊”,而基于选择标记的外源估计则随着种群的恢复而下降。在恢复期,使用中性标记计算个体混合饵料与年龄大小之间的关系强度也受到侵蚀,但选择标记的影响较小。总的来说,这些观察结果说明了选择下的标记如何反映种群的适合度和表型变化,而中性标记反映人口历史,因此不能不加批判地用于推断适合度结果。我们的研究结果还表明,挪威和其他一些国家使用的管理准则,将河流中驯化的逃逸鲑鱼和/或野生种群中驯化混合物的10%作为“大”影响的限制,将为野生鲑鱼种群提供高水平的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Applications
Evolutionary Applications 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Applications is a fully peer reviewed open access journal. It publishes papers that utilize concepts from evolutionary biology to address biological questions of health, social and economic relevance. Papers are expected to employ evolutionary concepts or methods to make contributions to areas such as (but not limited to): medicine, agriculture, forestry, exploitation and management (fisheries and wildlife), aquaculture, conservation biology, environmental sciences (including climate change and invasion biology), microbiology, and toxicology. All taxonomic groups are covered from microbes, fungi, plants and animals. In order to better serve the community, we also now strongly encourage submissions of papers making use of modern molecular and genetic methods (population and functional genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, quantitative genetics, association and linkage mapping) to address important questions in any of these disciplines and in an applied evolutionary framework. Theoretical, empirical, synthesis or perspective papers are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信