Systemic Approaches to Loyalty and Polarisation. Revisiting Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy's Ideas in a Contemporary Context

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Chris Ward
{"title":"Systemic Approaches to Loyalty and Polarisation. Revisiting Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy's Ideas in a Contemporary Context","authors":"Chris Ward","doi":"10.1111/1467-6427.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>When conflicted couples and families adopt polarised positions, constructive dialogue ceases. Racism, sexism, and other forms of polarisation have the same silencing effects in the public domain. This paper views polarisation through the lens of loyalty. It outlines a systemic approach to polarised defensiveness that combines constructionist perspectives, positioning, and the relational ethics of Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy (Nagy). Loyal partisanship can be understood in terms of Valeria Ugazio's semantic polarities. Polarisation is likely in Melanie Klein's ‘paranoid-schizoid’ position, where loyalty is defensive and unquestioning. In contrast, Eve Kofosky-Sedgwick describes a reparative position that invites curiosity. Nagy suggests that curiosity about an opponent's values and loyalties will reveal relational obligations and entitlements, including the destructive sense of entitlement that may underlie aggression and violence. Curiosity is a necessary precondition for a dialogue in which each opposing party is fully ‘present’ and able to offer each other the consideration they have earned.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Therapy","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6427.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When conflicted couples and families adopt polarised positions, constructive dialogue ceases. Racism, sexism, and other forms of polarisation have the same silencing effects in the public domain. This paper views polarisation through the lens of loyalty. It outlines a systemic approach to polarised defensiveness that combines constructionist perspectives, positioning, and the relational ethics of Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy (Nagy). Loyal partisanship can be understood in terms of Valeria Ugazio's semantic polarities. Polarisation is likely in Melanie Klein's ‘paranoid-schizoid’ position, where loyalty is defensive and unquestioning. In contrast, Eve Kofosky-Sedgwick describes a reparative position that invites curiosity. Nagy suggests that curiosity about an opponent's values and loyalties will reveal relational obligations and entitlements, including the destructive sense of entitlement that may underlie aggression and violence. Curiosity is a necessary precondition for a dialogue in which each opposing party is fully ‘present’ and able to offer each other the consideration they have earned.

忠诚和两极分化的系统方法。在当代语境中重新审视博索尔门尼纳吉的思想
当矛盾的夫妻和家庭采取两极分化的立场时,建设性的对话就停止了。种族主义、性别歧视和其他形式的两极分化在公共领域也有同样的沉默效果。本文从忠诚的角度来看待两极分化。它概述了一种结合了建构主义观点、定位和Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy (Nagy)的关系伦理学的极化防御的系统方法。忠诚的党派关系可以通过瓦莱里娅·乌加齐奥的语义两极来理解。两极分化很可能出现在梅兰妮·克莱因(Melanie Klein)的“偏执狂-精神分裂”立场上,即忠诚是防御性的、不容置疑的。相比之下,Eve Kofosky-Sedgwick描述了一种引起好奇心的修复立场。纳吉认为,对对手的价值观和忠诚的好奇心会揭示关系的义务和权利,包括可能潜藏在侵略和暴力背后的权利的破坏性意识。好奇心是对话的必要先决条件,在这种对话中,每一方都充分“在场”,并能够向对方提供他们所赢得的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Therapy advances the understanding and treatment of human relationships constituted in systems such as couples, families and professional networks and wider groups, by publishing articles on theory, research, clinical practice and training. The editorial board includes leading academics and professionals from around the world in keeping with the high standard of international contributions, which make it one of the most widely read family therapy journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信