Future Potential of Intelligent Systems in Fiscal Oversight: A Systematic Review

IF 3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pablo A. Quijano-Cabezas, Carlos A. Escobar-Marulanda, Jaime A. Restrepo-Carmona, Jovani A. Jiménez-Builes
{"title":"Future Potential of Intelligent Systems in Fiscal Oversight: A Systematic Review","authors":"Pablo A. Quijano-Cabezas,&nbsp;Carlos A. Escobar-Marulanda,&nbsp;Jaime A. Restrepo-Carmona,&nbsp;Jovani A. Jiménez-Builes","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/5770257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The way challenges are addressed across multiple areas of knowledge is currently being revolutionized by intelligent systems. These systems offer novel opportunities and viewpoints that deserve examination, particularly in the context of fiscal surveillance and control. However, although recent studies underscore a paradigm shift toward technology-driven audit research, the evidence on intelligent systems in fiscal oversight remains fragmented and has not been systematically organized. This article provides a systematic literature review that examines the potential of intelligent systems for efficiently managing public resources. To conduct the review, a search of documents from 2018 was conducted in databases such as Scopus, ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore, DOAJ, and Google Scholar, following the PRISMA statement and the Kitchenham and Charters method. The objective was to select 48 documents for analysis, adhering to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and to address the four research questions posed. Guided by these questions, the review (i) assesses the potential benefits of intelligent systems for fiscal surveillance and control, covering fraud detection, auditing, risk management, financial analysis, and automation; (ii) contrasts those advantages (greater transparency, efficiency, and efficacy) with the associated technical, organizational, legal, and social challenges; (iii) evaluates the current treatment of four core oversight areas; and (iv) identifies the prevailing technological trends, most notably blockchain, data mining, and artificial intelligence. Despite the limitations of the review, including its temporal scope, individual interpretations, and specific focus, these findings can provide valuable information for government agencies, enabling them to prioritize investments and enhance the management of public resources, thereby contributing to fairer and more equitable societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/5770257","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/5770257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The way challenges are addressed across multiple areas of knowledge is currently being revolutionized by intelligent systems. These systems offer novel opportunities and viewpoints that deserve examination, particularly in the context of fiscal surveillance and control. However, although recent studies underscore a paradigm shift toward technology-driven audit research, the evidence on intelligent systems in fiscal oversight remains fragmented and has not been systematically organized. This article provides a systematic literature review that examines the potential of intelligent systems for efficiently managing public resources. To conduct the review, a search of documents from 2018 was conducted in databases such as Scopus, ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore, DOAJ, and Google Scholar, following the PRISMA statement and the Kitchenham and Charters method. The objective was to select 48 documents for analysis, adhering to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and to address the four research questions posed. Guided by these questions, the review (i) assesses the potential benefits of intelligent systems for fiscal surveillance and control, covering fraud detection, auditing, risk management, financial analysis, and automation; (ii) contrasts those advantages (greater transparency, efficiency, and efficacy) with the associated technical, organizational, legal, and social challenges; (iii) evaluates the current treatment of four core oversight areas; and (iv) identifies the prevailing technological trends, most notably blockchain, data mining, and artificial intelligence. Despite the limitations of the review, including its temporal scope, individual interpretations, and specific focus, these findings can provide valuable information for government agencies, enabling them to prioritize investments and enhance the management of public resources, thereby contributing to fairer and more equitable societies.

Abstract Image

智能系统在财政监督中的未来潜力:系统回顾
目前,智能系统正在彻底改变跨多个知识领域解决挑战的方式。这些系统提供了新的机会和观点,值得研究,特别是在财政监督和控制的背景下。然而,尽管最近的研究强调了向技术驱动的审计研究的范式转变,但财政监督中智能系统的证据仍然是分散的,没有系统地组织起来。这篇文章提供了一个系统的文献综述,检查智能系统的潜力,有效地管理公共资源。为了进行审查,根据PRISMA声明和Kitchenham and Charters方法,在Scopus、ScienceDirect、IEEE Xplore、DOAJ和b谷歌Scholar等数据库中检索了2018年的文献。目的是选择48篇文献进行分析,遵循纳入和排除标准,并解决提出的四个研究问题。在这些问题的指导下,本报告(i)评估了智能财政监督和控制系统的潜在效益,包括欺诈检测、审计、风险管理、财务分析和自动化;(ii)将这些优势(更高的透明度、效率和效力)与相关的技术、组织、法律和社会挑战进行对比;评价目前对四个核心监督领域的处理;(iv)确定当前的技术趋势,最显著的是区块链、数据挖掘和人工智能。尽管审查的局限性,包括时间范围、个人解释和具体重点,但这些发现可以为政府机构提供有价值的信息,使它们能够确定投资的优先次序,加强公共资源的管理,从而为更公平、更公平的社会做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信