Comparison of Watermelon, Banana, and Orange Peel Pectin-Based Edible Films: Shelf Life Improvement of Chilled Beef Thigh Meat

IF 2.5 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Fahimeh Bahrami, Behnaz Bazargani-Gilani, Atefeh Sharifirad
{"title":"Comparison of Watermelon, Banana, and Orange Peel Pectin-Based Edible Films: Shelf Life Improvement of Chilled Beef Thigh Meat","authors":"Fahimeh Bahrami,&nbsp;Behnaz Bazargani-Gilani,&nbsp;Atefeh Sharifirad","doi":"10.1155/jfpp/2602850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study is aimed at the comparison of the pectin-based edible films (2%), resulting from watermelon (WMPP), banana (BPP), and orange peel (OPP), in the shelf life enhancement of beef thigh meat at 4<sup>°</sup>C ± 1<sup>°</sup>C during 9 days of storage period. After extracting pectin from the watermelon, banana, and orange peel, FTIR analysis and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were used to identify the obtained pectin. Tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break of OPP (0.56, 19.67 MPa, and 2.99%), BPP (0.56, 14.19 MPa, and 4.01%), and WMPP (0.45, 17.41 MPa, and 4.50%) films were evaluated. Additionally, the highest and lowest thickness belonged to the BPP (0.21 mm) and OPP (0.04 mm) films, respectively. Total viable count (TVC) of the wrapped beef thigh meat by WMPP, BPP, and OPP films was 6.86, 6.59, and 6.03 log CFU/g, respectively, while the control group reached 8.01 log CFU/g at the end of the storage period. The populations of psychrotrophic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, molds, and yeasts in the OPP treatment were the lowest (6.18, 5, and 3 log CFU/g) and BPP (6.88, 6.32, and 4.44 log CFU/g) and WMPP (7.12, 6.94, and 4.96 log CFU/g) groups were in the next ranks, respectively, on the ninth day. The lowest pH and total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) content of the samples was related to the OPP (5.81, 16.3 mg N/100 g) followed by BPP (5.98, 21.5 mg N/100 g) and WMPP (6.11, 22.3 mg N/100 g) treatments at the end of the storage period. The coated meat with OPP film registered acceptable sensory (odor, color, and overall acceptability) scores (≥ 3) during the entire storage period compared to the other treatments. It is concluded that OPP film, along with its more suitable mechanical properties, could enhance the shelf life of beef thigh meat compared to the BPP and WMPP treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jfpp/2602850","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Processing and Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jfpp/2602850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is aimed at the comparison of the pectin-based edible films (2%), resulting from watermelon (WMPP), banana (BPP), and orange peel (OPP), in the shelf life enhancement of beef thigh meat at 4°C ± 1°C during 9 days of storage period. After extracting pectin from the watermelon, banana, and orange peel, FTIR analysis and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were used to identify the obtained pectin. Tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break of OPP (0.56, 19.67 MPa, and 2.99%), BPP (0.56, 14.19 MPa, and 4.01%), and WMPP (0.45, 17.41 MPa, and 4.50%) films were evaluated. Additionally, the highest and lowest thickness belonged to the BPP (0.21 mm) and OPP (0.04 mm) films, respectively. Total viable count (TVC) of the wrapped beef thigh meat by WMPP, BPP, and OPP films was 6.86, 6.59, and 6.03 log CFU/g, respectively, while the control group reached 8.01 log CFU/g at the end of the storage period. The populations of psychrotrophic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, molds, and yeasts in the OPP treatment were the lowest (6.18, 5, and 3 log CFU/g) and BPP (6.88, 6.32, and 4.44 log CFU/g) and WMPP (7.12, 6.94, and 4.96 log CFU/g) groups were in the next ranks, respectively, on the ninth day. The lowest pH and total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) content of the samples was related to the OPP (5.81, 16.3 mg N/100 g) followed by BPP (5.98, 21.5 mg N/100 g) and WMPP (6.11, 22.3 mg N/100 g) treatments at the end of the storage period. The coated meat with OPP film registered acceptable sensory (odor, color, and overall acceptability) scores (≥ 3) during the entire storage period compared to the other treatments. It is concluded that OPP film, along with its more suitable mechanical properties, could enhance the shelf life of beef thigh meat compared to the BPP and WMPP treatments.

Abstract Image

西瓜、香蕉和橙皮果胶基可食性薄膜的比较:提高冷藏牛肉大腿肉的保质期
本研究旨在比较由西瓜(WMPP)、香蕉(BPP)和橙皮(OPP)制成的果胶基可食性薄膜(2%)在4℃±1℃条件下提高牛肉大腿肉9天的保质期。从西瓜、香蕉和橙皮中提取果胶后,利用红外光谱分析和扫描电镜(SEM)对所得果胶进行鉴定。对OPP(0.56、19.67 MPa、2.99%)、BPP(0.56、14.19 MPa、4.01%)、WMPP(0.45、17.41 MPa、4.50%)薄膜的拉伸强度、杨氏模量和断裂伸长率进行了评价。BPP膜厚度最高,为0.21 mm, OPP膜厚度最低,为0.04 mm。WMPP、BPP和OPP膜包裹牛肉大腿肉的总活菌数(TVC)分别为6.86、6.59和6.03 log CFU/g,而对照组在贮藏期结束时达到8.01 log CFU/g。OPP处理的精神营养细菌、肠杆菌科、霉菌和酵母菌数量最低(6.18、5和3 log CFU/g), BPP组(6.88、6.32和4.44 log CFU/g)和WMPP组(7.12、6.94和4.96 log CFU/g)分别排在第9天。贮藏后期样品的pH和总挥发性碱性氮(TVB-N)含量与OPP处理(5.81、16.3 mg N/100 g)有关,其次是BPP处理(5.98、21.5 mg N/100 g)和WMPP处理(6.11、22.3 mg N/100 g)。与其他处理相比,涂有OPP膜的肉在整个储存期间的感官(气味、颜色和总体可接受性)得分(≥3)都是可接受的。综上所述,与BPP和WMPP处理相比,OPP膜具有更合适的机械性能,可以延长牛大腿肉的保质期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The journal presents readers with the latest research, knowledge, emerging technologies, and advances in food processing and preservation. Encompassing chemical, physical, quality, and engineering properties of food materials, the Journal of Food Processing and Preservation provides a balance between fundamental chemistry and engineering principles and applicable food processing and preservation technologies. This is the only journal dedicated to publishing both fundamental and applied research relating to food processing and preservation, benefiting the research, commercial, and industrial communities. It publishes research articles directed at the safe preservation and successful consumer acceptance of unique, innovative, non-traditional international or domestic foods. In addition, the journal features important discussions of current economic and regulatory policies and their effects on the safe and quality processing and preservation of a wide array of foods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信