PERI-URBAN EXTRACTIVISM: The Political Economy of ‘Cheap Sprawl’

IF 1.9 2区 经济学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Aurélie Delage, Max Rousseau
{"title":"PERI-URBAN EXTRACTIVISM: The Political Economy of ‘Cheap Sprawl’","authors":"Aurélie Delage,&nbsp;Max Rousseau","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.13334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores peri-urbanization through the lens of extractivism from a critical political-economic perspective. Our analytical framework sheds new light on peri-urbanization. We examine the uneven nature of the process, unpack its <i>growth engine</i> and highlight its shortcomings. By shifting the focus from the demand to the supply of peri-urban housing, our approach overcomes the limitations of a traditional analysis based on land rent. Peri-urbanization is thus considered in the light of resource exploitation (namely land), by a coalition of public and private stakeholders, whose methods include accumulation by dispossession. Land and modest homebuyers are the resources exploited by the coalition to extract solid value. Simultaneously, sprawl is the engine that provides a continuous supply of cheap land to sustain the process. However, when this coalition captures value from the urbanization of agricultural land (and the creditworthiness of precarious homebuyers), the resulting irreparable soil artificialization impedes future redevelopments. By drawing on two case studies of this type of ‘cheap sprawl’ and by bridging the traditional North–South divide, this article provides empirical evidence to show that peri-urban extractivism is just that: a predatory system. Not only does it keep peripheral areas in a state of ‘nondevelopment’, it also takes a serious toll on the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","volume":"49 5","pages":"1040-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2427.13334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores peri-urbanization through the lens of extractivism from a critical political-economic perspective. Our analytical framework sheds new light on peri-urbanization. We examine the uneven nature of the process, unpack its growth engine and highlight its shortcomings. By shifting the focus from the demand to the supply of peri-urban housing, our approach overcomes the limitations of a traditional analysis based on land rent. Peri-urbanization is thus considered in the light of resource exploitation (namely land), by a coalition of public and private stakeholders, whose methods include accumulation by dispossession. Land and modest homebuyers are the resources exploited by the coalition to extract solid value. Simultaneously, sprawl is the engine that provides a continuous supply of cheap land to sustain the process. However, when this coalition captures value from the urbanization of agricultural land (and the creditworthiness of precarious homebuyers), the resulting irreparable soil artificialization impedes future redevelopments. By drawing on two case studies of this type of ‘cheap sprawl’ and by bridging the traditional North–South divide, this article provides empirical evidence to show that peri-urban extractivism is just that: a predatory system. Not only does it keep peripheral areas in a state of ‘nondevelopment’, it also takes a serious toll on the environment.

城市周边的采掘主义:“廉价扩张”的政治经济学
本文从批判的政治经济视角出发,通过采掘主义的视角来探讨半城市化。我们的分析框架为半城市化提供了新的视角。我们考察了这一过程的不平衡性质,揭示了其增长引擎,并强调了其缺点。通过将重点从城市周边住房的需求转移到供应,我们的方法克服了基于土地租金的传统分析的局限性。因此,半城市化是在资源开发(即土地)的基础上考虑的,由公共和私人利益相关者组成的联盟,其方法包括通过剥夺来积累。土地和适度的购房者是联合政府榨取稳定价值的资源。同时,城市扩张是提供廉价土地持续供应以维持这一进程的引擎。然而,当这个联盟从农业用地的城市化(以及不稳定的购房者的信誉)中获取价值时,由此产生的不可修复的土壤人工化阻碍了未来的再开发。通过对这类“廉价扩张”的两个案例研究,并通过弥合传统的南北鸿沟,本文提供了经验证据,表明城郊地区的榨取主义正是一种掠夺性体系。它不仅使周边地区处于“不发展”状态,还对环境造成严重损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: A groundbreaking forum for intellectual debate, IJURR is at the forefront of urban and regional research. With a cutting edge approach to linking theoretical development and empirical research, and a consistent demand for quality, IJURR encompasses key material from an unparalleled range of critical, comparative and geographic perspectives. Embracing a multidisciplinary approach to the field, IJURR is essential reading for social scientists with a concern for the complex, changing roles and futures of cities and regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信