Lack of effect of a parent-delivered early language intervention: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial completed during COVID-19

IF 3.1
JCPP advances Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12279
Kelly Burgoyne, Stephanie Hargreaves, Nasima Akhter, Helen Cramman, Paivi Eerola, Jochen Einbeck, Vic Menzies
{"title":"Lack of effect of a parent-delivered early language intervention: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial completed during COVID-19","authors":"Kelly Burgoyne,&nbsp;Stephanie Hargreaves,&nbsp;Nasima Akhter,&nbsp;Helen Cramman,&nbsp;Paivi Eerola,&nbsp;Jochen Einbeck,&nbsp;Vic Menzies","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.12279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Parents play a key role in their child's early development but evidence that parental engagement strategies are effective is unclear. The current study evaluated a parent-delivered early language teaching programme that aimed to support children's early language and literacy skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multisite, pupil-level randomised controlled trial was conducted with 450 3–4-year-old children and their families, recruited from 47 nurseries across Greater Manchester and Lancashire (UK). Families were randomly allocated to either the programme group (<i>N</i> = 225) who delivered an early language teaching programme for 20-min a day, 5 days a week, for 30-weeks or to a control group (<i>N</i> = 225) who received a box of children's books at the end of nursery. A language latent variable formed the primary outcome, which was used to assess whether the programme improved children's language and literacy skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>COVID-19 disrupted the trial, including delivery of the intervention and post-test data collection. Data from assessments completed 10-months after intervention showed no evidence that the children receiving language intervention had greater language skills than the control group. Similarly, no group differences were found on measures of the Home Learning Environment or school readiness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Whilst disruptions caused by COVID-19 are likely to have impacted on the findings, this study nonetheless adds to the literature which suggests that parent-delivered interventions alone may not necessarily lead to changes in home learning or to gains in children's language skills.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcv2.12279","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcv2.12279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Parents play a key role in their child's early development but evidence that parental engagement strategies are effective is unclear. The current study evaluated a parent-delivered early language teaching programme that aimed to support children's early language and literacy skills.

Methods

A multisite, pupil-level randomised controlled trial was conducted with 450 3–4-year-old children and their families, recruited from 47 nurseries across Greater Manchester and Lancashire (UK). Families were randomly allocated to either the programme group (N = 225) who delivered an early language teaching programme for 20-min a day, 5 days a week, for 30-weeks or to a control group (N = 225) who received a box of children's books at the end of nursery. A language latent variable formed the primary outcome, which was used to assess whether the programme improved children's language and literacy skills.

Results

COVID-19 disrupted the trial, including delivery of the intervention and post-test data collection. Data from assessments completed 10-months after intervention showed no evidence that the children receiving language intervention had greater language skills than the control group. Similarly, no group differences were found on measures of the Home Learning Environment or school readiness.

Conclusions

Whilst disruptions caused by COVID-19 are likely to have impacted on the findings, this study nonetheless adds to the literature which suggests that parent-delivered interventions alone may not necessarily lead to changes in home learning or to gains in children's language skills.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

父母提供的早期语言干预缺乏效果:来自COVID-19期间完成的随机对照试验的证据
背景父母在孩子的早期发展中起着关键作用,但父母参与策略有效的证据尚不清楚。目前的研究评估了一个家长提供的早期语言教学计划,旨在支持儿童早期的语言和读写技能。方法对来自英国大曼彻斯特和兰开夏郡47所幼儿园的450名3 - 4岁儿童及其家庭进行多地点、学生水平随机对照试验。家庭被随机分配到计划组(N = 225),他们每天提供20分钟的早期语言教学计划,每周5天,持续30周,或者对照组(N = 225),他们在幼儿园结束时收到一盒儿童书籍。语言潜在变量构成了主要结果,用于评估该计划是否提高了儿童的语言和识字技能。COVID-19扰乱了试验,包括干预措施的提供和测试后数据的收集。干预10个月后完成的评估数据显示,没有证据表明接受语言干预的孩子比对照组的孩子有更高的语言技能。同样,在家庭学习环境或入学准备方面也没有发现组间差异。虽然COVID-19造成的干扰可能对研究结果产生了影响,但这项研究补充了文献,表明仅靠父母提供的干预措施可能不一定会导致家庭学习的变化或儿童语言技能的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信