Multi-scalar habitat selection unveils ecological domains in wolves when selecting rendezvous sites

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
S. Droghei, M. Falco, P. Ciucci
{"title":"Multi-scalar habitat selection unveils ecological domains in wolves when selecting rendezvous sites","authors":"S. Droghei,&nbsp;M. Falco,&nbsp;P. Ciucci","doi":"10.1111/jzo.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wolves are known to be habitat generalists, but they may have critical requirements during key life-cycle stages, such as reproduction and pup rearing. Especially in human-dominated landscapes, wolves may become particularly choosy concerning the location of their homesites to reduce human-related risk and disturbance, thus enhancing pup survival. From 2005 to 2010, we investigated habitat selection by wolves when establishing the territory at the landscape scale (i.e., 2nd order selection) and when locating rendezvous sites within the territory (i.e., 3rd order selection), the latter based on 31 acoustically and field-verified rendezvous sites (RVs) in 8 packs in the Abruzzo Lazio and Molise National Park, a historical stronghold of the species in central Italy where wolves always coexisted with humans. Using a hierarchical, multi-scale habitat selection approach through multi-grain resource selection functions (MRSFs), we investigated environmental, topographic, and anthropogenic factors affecting territory and RVs selection by wolves. At the landscape scale, wolves avoided human settlements and primary roads and selected forested areas, shrubland, and rough terrain, likely to improve concealment and decrease human-associated risks; however, they also positively selected pastures and trails to possibly improve efficiency in hunting and traveling. When locating RVs within the territory, wolves still selected forested areas, shrubland, and pastures but differently than the 2nd order, they avoided anthropogenic linear features (secondary roads and trails) and rough terrain. Our findings confirm that habitat selection by wolves is better understood through a multi-scalar approach, which may reveal trade-offs in selection decisions across different spatial scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":"327 1","pages":"49-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jzo.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wolves are known to be habitat generalists, but they may have critical requirements during key life-cycle stages, such as reproduction and pup rearing. Especially in human-dominated landscapes, wolves may become particularly choosy concerning the location of their homesites to reduce human-related risk and disturbance, thus enhancing pup survival. From 2005 to 2010, we investigated habitat selection by wolves when establishing the territory at the landscape scale (i.e., 2nd order selection) and when locating rendezvous sites within the territory (i.e., 3rd order selection), the latter based on 31 acoustically and field-verified rendezvous sites (RVs) in 8 packs in the Abruzzo Lazio and Molise National Park, a historical stronghold of the species in central Italy where wolves always coexisted with humans. Using a hierarchical, multi-scale habitat selection approach through multi-grain resource selection functions (MRSFs), we investigated environmental, topographic, and anthropogenic factors affecting territory and RVs selection by wolves. At the landscape scale, wolves avoided human settlements and primary roads and selected forested areas, shrubland, and rough terrain, likely to improve concealment and decrease human-associated risks; however, they also positively selected pastures and trails to possibly improve efficiency in hunting and traveling. When locating RVs within the territory, wolves still selected forested areas, shrubland, and pastures but differently than the 2nd order, they avoided anthropogenic linear features (secondary roads and trails) and rough terrain. Our findings confirm that habitat selection by wolves is better understood through a multi-scalar approach, which may reveal trade-offs in selection decisions across different spatial scales.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多标量栖息地选择揭示了狼在选择交会地点时的生态域
狼被认为是栖息地的通用者,但它们可能在关键的生命周期阶段有关键的需求,比如繁殖和抚养幼崽。特别是在人类主导的景观中,狼可能会对其栖息地的位置变得特别挑剔,以减少与人类相关的风险和干扰,从而提高幼崽的存活率。从2005年到2010年,我们研究了狼在景观尺度上建立领土(即二级选择)和在领土内确定会合点(即三级选择)时的栖息地选择,后者基于Abruzzo Lazio和Molise国家公园的8个狼群的31个声学和实地验证的会合点(rv),该公园是狼在意大利中部的历史据点,狼一直与人类共存。通过多粒资源选择函数(mrsf),采用分层、多尺度生境选择方法,研究了影响狼领地和房车选择的环境、地形和人为因素。在景观尺度上,狼避开人类住区和主要道路,并选择森林、灌丛和崎岖地形,可能提高隐蔽性,降低人类相关风险;然而,他们也积极选择牧场和小径,以提高狩猎和旅行的效率。在区域内定位房车时,狼仍然选择森林、灌木和牧场,但与第二级不同的是,狼避开了人为的线性特征(次要道路和小径)和崎岖地形。我们的研究结果证实,通过多尺度方法可以更好地理解狼的栖息地选择,这可能揭示了不同空间尺度选择决策的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信