ASSOCIATION OF ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY USE AND DURATION OF SYSTEMIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC EGFR-MUTATED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Michael Yan , Ambika Parmar , Natalie Coburn , Lena Nguyen , Alexander Louie
{"title":"ASSOCIATION OF ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY USE AND DURATION OF SYSTEMIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC EGFR-MUTATED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS","authors":"Michael Yan ,&nbsp;Ambika Parmar ,&nbsp;Natalie Coburn ,&nbsp;Lena Nguyen ,&nbsp;Alexander Louie","doi":"10.1016/S0167-8140(25)04676-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><div>Advances in systemic therapy have improved survival for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized trials have shown that adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Prospective studies also suggest that SBRT to oligoprogressive sites may prolong the duration of the same line of systemic therapy. This study evaluates these outcomes in a real-world setting using a population-based healthcare administrative database.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><div>We analyzed data from the provincial Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), a repository of linked health administrative databases, identifying all patients diagnosed with non-squamous NSCLC between 2002 and 2022, in Ontario, Canada. Eligible patients received EGFR-targeted therapy with Gefitinib or Osimertinib, with treatment start/stop dates and radiotherapy (RT) data recorded. Patients younger than 18 or those with a prior cancer diagnosis within five years of NSCLC diagnosis were excluded. SBRT was defined as any radiotherapy course delivering ≥5 Gy per fraction in ≤8 fractions, except for single-fraction treatments ≤8 Gy. Patients who received SBRT during EGFR-targeted therapy were classified in the SBRT cohort, while all others comprised the palliative RT cohort. The primary outcome was the duration of first-line systemic therapy. Baseline and treatment characteristics were summarized descriptively, and OS was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method from the date of drug start. Propensity score matching using logistic regression adjusted for baseline factors influencing systemic therapy duration, including age, sex, rurality index, Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices, income quintile, and treatment year. A sensitivity analysis excluded patients treated before 2013 (~10% of the cohort).</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>A total of 898 patients met inclusion criteria, with 185 receiving SBRT and 713 receiving palliative RT. SBRT use increased in later years (2019-2022). The median duration of first-line systemic therapy was 683 days in the SBRT cohort versus 400 days in the palliative RT cohort (p&lt;0.01). Median OS was 35.3 months (95% CI 27.2-77.5) for SBRT and 23.1 months (25.4-32.4) for palliative RT (p&lt;0.01 log rank test). After excluding patients treated before 2013, 797 patients remained (SBRT: 171, palliative RT: 626). Median first-line systemic therapy duration was 692 versus 393 days, respectively (p&lt;0.01), and median OS was 35.6 (95% CI 31.4-41.2) versus 23.1 months (95%CI 21.2-24.5) (p&lt;0.01 log rank test). After propensity score matching (n=364, 184 per cohort), standardized mean differences were balanced (&lt;0.1). The SBRT cohort maintained a longer median first-line therapy duration (683 versus 431 days, p&lt;0.01) and improved median OS (35.3 versus 23.7 months) (p&lt;0.01 log rank test).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>SBRT was associated with prolonged first-line systemic therapy duration and improved OS compared to palliative RT in Stage IV EGFR patients treated with targeted therapy. These findings remained consistent after propensity score matching and sensitivity analysis. SBRT may help extend the effective duration of systemic therapy in carefully selected patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"210 ","pages":"Pages S9-S10"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814025046766","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:

Advances in systemic therapy have improved survival for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized trials have shown that adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Prospective studies also suggest that SBRT to oligoprogressive sites may prolong the duration of the same line of systemic therapy. This study evaluates these outcomes in a real-world setting using a population-based healthcare administrative database.

Materials and Methods:

We analyzed data from the provincial Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), a repository of linked health administrative databases, identifying all patients diagnosed with non-squamous NSCLC between 2002 and 2022, in Ontario, Canada. Eligible patients received EGFR-targeted therapy with Gefitinib or Osimertinib, with treatment start/stop dates and radiotherapy (RT) data recorded. Patients younger than 18 or those with a prior cancer diagnosis within five years of NSCLC diagnosis were excluded. SBRT was defined as any radiotherapy course delivering ≥5 Gy per fraction in ≤8 fractions, except for single-fraction treatments ≤8 Gy. Patients who received SBRT during EGFR-targeted therapy were classified in the SBRT cohort, while all others comprised the palliative RT cohort. The primary outcome was the duration of first-line systemic therapy. Baseline and treatment characteristics were summarized descriptively, and OS was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method from the date of drug start. Propensity score matching using logistic regression adjusted for baseline factors influencing systemic therapy duration, including age, sex, rurality index, Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices, income quintile, and treatment year. A sensitivity analysis excluded patients treated before 2013 (~10% of the cohort).

Results:

A total of 898 patients met inclusion criteria, with 185 receiving SBRT and 713 receiving palliative RT. SBRT use increased in later years (2019-2022). The median duration of first-line systemic therapy was 683 days in the SBRT cohort versus 400 days in the palliative RT cohort (p<0.01). Median OS was 35.3 months (95% CI 27.2-77.5) for SBRT and 23.1 months (25.4-32.4) for palliative RT (p<0.01 log rank test). After excluding patients treated before 2013, 797 patients remained (SBRT: 171, palliative RT: 626). Median first-line systemic therapy duration was 692 versus 393 days, respectively (p<0.01), and median OS was 35.6 (95% CI 31.4-41.2) versus 23.1 months (95%CI 21.2-24.5) (p<0.01 log rank test). After propensity score matching (n=364, 184 per cohort), standardized mean differences were balanced (<0.1). The SBRT cohort maintained a longer median first-line therapy duration (683 versus 431 days, p<0.01) and improved median OS (35.3 versus 23.7 months) (p<0.01 log rank test).

Conclusions:

SBRT was associated with prolonged first-line systemic therapy duration and improved OS compared to palliative RT in Stage IV EGFR patients treated with targeted therapy. These findings remained consistent after propensity score matching and sensitivity analysis. SBRT may help extend the effective duration of systemic therapy in carefully selected patients.
转移性egfr突变的非小细胞肺癌患者消融放疗使用与全身治疗持续时间的关联:一项基于人群的分析
目的:全身治疗的进步提高了egfr突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存率。随机试验表明,在egfr靶向酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的基础上添加立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)可能改善无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。前瞻性研究还表明,将SBRT用于少进展部位可能会延长同一系列全身治疗的持续时间。本研究使用基于人群的医疗管理数据库在现实世界中评估这些结果。材料和方法:我们分析了来自省级临床评估科学研究所(ICES)的数据,该研究所是一个链接卫生管理数据库的存储库,确定了2002年至2022年间加拿大安大略省所有被诊断为非鳞状NSCLC的患者。符合条件的患者接受了吉非替尼或奥西替尼的egfr靶向治疗,并记录了治疗开始/停止日期和放疗(RT)数据。年龄小于18岁的患者或在NSCLC诊断后5年内有过癌症诊断的患者被排除在外。SBRT被定义为任何放疗过程,每段放射量≥5 Gy,在≤8段放射量中,单段放射治疗≤8 Gy除外。在egfr靶向治疗期间接受SBRT治疗的患者被归类为SBRT队列,而所有其他患者均属于姑息性RT队列。主要终点是一线全身治疗的持续时间。描述性地总结基线和治疗特征,并通过Kaplan-Meier法自用药之日起估计OS。使用logistic回归进行倾向评分匹配,调整影响全身治疗持续时间的基线因素,包括年龄、性别、农村指数、Charlson和Elixhauser合并症指数、收入五分位数和治疗年份。敏感性分析排除了2013年之前接受治疗的患者(约占队列的10%)。结果:共有898例患者符合纳入标准,其中185例接受SBRT治疗,713例接受姑息性rt治疗。SBRT的使用在后期(2019-2022年)有所增加。一线全身治疗的中位持续时间在SBRT队列中为683天,在姑息性RT队列中为400天(p<0.01)。SBRT的中位OS为35.3个月(95% CI 27.2-77.5),姑息性RT的中位OS为23.1个月(25.4-32.4)(p<;0.01 log rank检验)。排除2013年之前治疗的患者后,剩余797例患者(SBRT: 171例,姑息治疗:626例)。中位一线全身治疗持续时间分别为692天和393天(p<0.01),中位OS为35.6个月(95%CI 31.4-41.2)和23.1个月(95%CI 21.2-24.5) (p<;0.01 log rank检验)。倾向评分匹配后(每个队列n= 364,184),平衡标准化平均差异(<0.1)。SBRT队列维持较长的一线治疗中位持续时间(683天对431天,p<0.01)和改善的中位OS(35.3个月对23.7个月)(p<;0.01 log rank检验)。结论:与姑息性放疗相比,在接受靶向治疗的IV期EGFR患者中,SBRT与一线全身治疗时间延长和OS改善相关。这些发现在倾向评分匹配和敏感性分析后保持一致。在精心挑选的患者中,SBRT可能有助于延长全身治疗的有效持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信