Role of MDCT for selection of peritoneal carcinomatosis patients as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Concordance between radiological and surgical scores using the Peritoneal Cancer Index
A. Cernuda García , E.O. Turienzo Santos , T. Díaz Vico , A. Mesa Álvarez , R. Rodríguez Uría , M. Moreno Gijón , L.M. Sanz Álvarez
{"title":"Role of MDCT for selection of peritoneal carcinomatosis patients as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Concordance between radiological and surgical scores using the Peritoneal Cancer Index","authors":"A. Cernuda García , E.O. Turienzo Santos , T. Díaz Vico , A. Mesa Álvarez , R. Rodríguez Uría , M. Moreno Gijón , L.M. Sanz Álvarez","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2025.101585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC), through an analysis of the degree of correlation between the radiological (rPCI) and surgical (sPCI) scores in the PC index.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational, retrospective, single-centre study between 1 May 2014 and 31 May 2018. Calculated rPCI assessed by MDCT was compared with the sPCI using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman method was used to plot the difference between the two observations against their mean with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. We assessed whether tumour volume affects the CCC by setting a cut-off point of sPCI at 15 and considering a sensitivity and specificity of rPCI > 20 as a predictor of unresectability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>50 patients underwent surgery. Mean sPCI was 11.8 (9.5) and rPCI was 11.0 (10.2), with a CCC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.97). The CCC in the 35 patients with sPCI 20 had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68–0.92) and a specificity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85). The positive predictive value was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80–0.98), while the negative predictive value was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.03–0.56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MDCT, interpreted by an expert radiologist, is reliable for the selection of patients as candidates for CRS + HIPEC; however, the rPCI value cannot be considered in isolation as a contraindication to full treatment. Greater tumour volume usually leads to a worse concordance between rPCI and sPCI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":"67 5","pages":"Article 101585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510725001077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC), through an analysis of the degree of correlation between the radiological (rPCI) and surgical (sPCI) scores in the PC index.
Methods
Observational, retrospective, single-centre study between 1 May 2014 and 31 May 2018. Calculated rPCI assessed by MDCT was compared with the sPCI using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman method was used to plot the difference between the two observations against their mean with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. We assessed whether tumour volume affects the CCC by setting a cut-off point of sPCI at 15 and considering a sensitivity and specificity of rPCI > 20 as a predictor of unresectability.
Results
50 patients underwent surgery. Mean sPCI was 11.8 (9.5) and rPCI was 11.0 (10.2), with a CCC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.97). The CCC in the 35 patients with sPCI 20 had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68–0.92) and a specificity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85). The positive predictive value was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80–0.98), while the negative predictive value was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.03–0.56).
Conclusion
MDCT, interpreted by an expert radiologist, is reliable for the selection of patients as candidates for CRS + HIPEC; however, the rPCI value cannot be considered in isolation as a contraindication to full treatment. Greater tumour volume usually leads to a worse concordance between rPCI and sPCI.