MONRBO: A multi-objective Newton-Raphson-based optimizer with dynamic elimination-based crowding distance for numerical benchmark and engineering design problems

IF 6.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Premkumar Manoharan , Sowmya Ravichandran , Garima Sinha , Tan Ching Sin , Ahmad O. Hourani , Tengku Juhana Tengku Hashim
{"title":"MONRBO: A multi-objective Newton-Raphson-based optimizer with dynamic elimination-based crowding distance for numerical benchmark and engineering design problems","authors":"Premkumar Manoharan ,&nbsp;Sowmya Ravichandran ,&nbsp;Garima Sinha ,&nbsp;Tan Ching Sin ,&nbsp;Ahmad O. Hourani ,&nbsp;Tengku Juhana Tengku Hashim","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2025.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the multi-objective optimization domain, where the aim is to handle multiple conflicting objectives simultaneously, the effectiveness of the optimization algorithm plays a critical role. The Newton-Raphson-Based Optimizer (NRBO) is initially developed for single-objective problems employs a Newton-Raphson-based search rule to navigate complex solution spaces. This study introduces a new extension of this approach, termed Multi-Objective NRBO (MONRBO), to solve multi-objective optimization problems. The proposed MONRBO incorporates non-dominated sorting and a dynamic elimination-based crowding distance mechanism to maintain solution diversity and improve convergence toward the true Pareto front. The performance of MONRBO is evaluated in three phases. First, it is tested on five standard bi-objective problems from the ZDT benchmark suite. Second, its capability is assessed on seven scalable tri-objective problems from the DTLZ test suite. Finally, its practical applicability is validated on six real-world constrained engineering design problems. MONRBO is compared with state-of-the-art algorithms using comprehensive performance metrics, including GD, IGD, HV, Spread, and Spacing in all phases. The results consistently demonstrate that MONRBO achieves competitive performance across test problems and real-world applications, highlighting its robustness, scalability, and effectiveness for solving complex multi-objective optimization problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"130 ","pages":"Pages 374-402"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016825009780","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the multi-objective optimization domain, where the aim is to handle multiple conflicting objectives simultaneously, the effectiveness of the optimization algorithm plays a critical role. The Newton-Raphson-Based Optimizer (NRBO) is initially developed for single-objective problems employs a Newton-Raphson-based search rule to navigate complex solution spaces. This study introduces a new extension of this approach, termed Multi-Objective NRBO (MONRBO), to solve multi-objective optimization problems. The proposed MONRBO incorporates non-dominated sorting and a dynamic elimination-based crowding distance mechanism to maintain solution diversity and improve convergence toward the true Pareto front. The performance of MONRBO is evaluated in three phases. First, it is tested on five standard bi-objective problems from the ZDT benchmark suite. Second, its capability is assessed on seven scalable tri-objective problems from the DTLZ test suite. Finally, its practical applicability is validated on six real-world constrained engineering design problems. MONRBO is compared with state-of-the-art algorithms using comprehensive performance metrics, including GD, IGD, HV, Spread, and Spacing in all phases. The results consistently demonstrate that MONRBO achieves competitive performance across test problems and real-world applications, highlighting its robustness, scalability, and effectiveness for solving complex multi-objective optimization problems.
基于动态消除拥挤距离的多目标newton - raphson优化器,用于数值基准和工程设计问题
在多目标优化领域,要同时处理多个相互冲突的目标,优化算法的有效性至关重要。基于牛顿-拉斐尔的优化器(NRBO)最初是针对单目标问题开发的,它采用基于牛顿-拉斐尔的搜索规则来导航复杂的解空间。本文介绍了该方法的一个新的扩展,称为多目标NRBO (MONRBO),以解决多目标优化问题。该算法结合了非支配排序和基于动态消除的拥挤距离机制,以保持解的多样性并提高向真帕累托前沿的收敛性。MONRBO的性能评估分为三个阶段。首先,它在ZDT基准测试套件中的五个标准双目标问题上进行测试。其次,对DTLZ测试套件中的七个可扩展三目标问题进行了能力评估。最后,通过六个实际约束工程设计问题验证了该方法的实用性。MONRBO使用综合性能指标对最先进的算法进行比较,包括所有阶段的GD、IGD、HV、Spread和Spacing。结果一致表明,MONRBO在测试问题和实际应用中实现了具有竞争力的性能,突出了其健壮性、可扩展性和解决复杂多目标优化问题的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信