Haodi Zhang , Junwei Ge , Jinya Su , Kun Gu , Fuyou Wang , Wen-Hua Chen , Shihua Li
{"title":"Model predictive control with residual learning and real-time disturbance rejection: Design and experimentation","authors":"Haodi Zhang , Junwei Ge , Jinya Su , Kun Gu , Fuyou Wang , Wen-Hua Chen , Shihua Li","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Model Predictive Control (MPC) deteriorates with low-quality prediction models and unknown external disturbances. Simply incorporating residual physics learning or uncertainty/disturbance rejection alone as in existing studies often yields limited performance gains for MPC. In this study, we integrate sparse Gaussian Process (GP) and Generalized Extended State Observer (GESO) within MPC, forming the GP-MPC-GESO controller. In this framework, GP learns the residual physics, improving the prediction model while reducing GESO’s disturbance estimation load. Meanwhile, GESO estimates the GP’s remaining residual uncertainties and external disturbances in real time and is directly incorporated into MPC prediction model. The synergy between GP residual learning and real-time GESO in managing uncertainties and disturbances significantly enhances MPC’s tracking control performance with a simplified nominal physical model. Comparative trajectory tracking control experiments on Mecanum Wheel Mobile Robots in both indoor and outdoor environments under various settings demonstrate that the proposed GP-MPC-GESO controller reduces RMSE by 12.4% and 16.2% compared to the state-of-the-art MPC-GESO controller in indoor and outdoor Lemniscate tracking, respectively. The video demonstration of this work is available at <span><span>https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LC81S093iogWxzyBcHFuWGLth1u-Wwcx/view?usp=drive_link</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106587"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125003491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Model Predictive Control (MPC) deteriorates with low-quality prediction models and unknown external disturbances. Simply incorporating residual physics learning or uncertainty/disturbance rejection alone as in existing studies often yields limited performance gains for MPC. In this study, we integrate sparse Gaussian Process (GP) and Generalized Extended State Observer (GESO) within MPC, forming the GP-MPC-GESO controller. In this framework, GP learns the residual physics, improving the prediction model while reducing GESO’s disturbance estimation load. Meanwhile, GESO estimates the GP’s remaining residual uncertainties and external disturbances in real time and is directly incorporated into MPC prediction model. The synergy between GP residual learning and real-time GESO in managing uncertainties and disturbances significantly enhances MPC’s tracking control performance with a simplified nominal physical model. Comparative trajectory tracking control experiments on Mecanum Wheel Mobile Robots in both indoor and outdoor environments under various settings demonstrate that the proposed GP-MPC-GESO controller reduces RMSE by 12.4% and 16.2% compared to the state-of-the-art MPC-GESO controller in indoor and outdoor Lemniscate tracking, respectively. The video demonstration of this work is available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LC81S093iogWxzyBcHFuWGLth1u-Wwcx/view?usp=drive_link.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.