A comparative assessment for agricultural eco-efficiency under conventional tillage and conservation tillage: A case study of China

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Yuanyuan Li , Caixia Xue , Chaoqing Chai , Wei Li
{"title":"A comparative assessment for agricultural eco-efficiency under conventional tillage and conservation tillage: A case study of China","authors":"Yuanyuan Li ,&nbsp;Caixia Xue ,&nbsp;Chaoqing Chai ,&nbsp;Wei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving low-carbon agricultural development represents a fundamental objective of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Conservation tillage has demonstrated distinct advantages over conventional tillage across economy, ecology, and society. Nevertheless, prior research has not adequately addressed the differences in Agricultural Eco-Efficiency (AEE) between conventional tillage and conservation tillage. Based on provincial panel data from 2000 to 2020, this study constructs a comprehensive evaluation index of AEE under different tillage regimes, in alignment with national “dual carbon” targets. A multi-level comparative analysis employing the kernel density estimation, the standard deviation ellipse model, and the Markov chain model is conducted to examine the spatiotemporal evolution of AEE and to forecast future trends. The findings indicate that, overall, AEE under conservation tillage demonstrates a marked increase compared to conventional tillage, with both systems exhibiting an initial decline followed by an increase over time. However, individual provinces differ significantly in the relative baseline AEE of contrasting tillage systems and trends over time. The long-term evolution of AEE in individual provinces is shaped by a combination of geospatial patterns, initial conditions, and other influencing factors. These findings provide valuable insights for policy formulation, the dissemination of conservation tillage, and the advancement of sustainable agricultural.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103890"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725003316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving low-carbon agricultural development represents a fundamental objective of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Conservation tillage has demonstrated distinct advantages over conventional tillage across economy, ecology, and society. Nevertheless, prior research has not adequately addressed the differences in Agricultural Eco-Efficiency (AEE) between conventional tillage and conservation tillage. Based on provincial panel data from 2000 to 2020, this study constructs a comprehensive evaluation index of AEE under different tillage regimes, in alignment with national “dual carbon” targets. A multi-level comparative analysis employing the kernel density estimation, the standard deviation ellipse model, and the Markov chain model is conducted to examine the spatiotemporal evolution of AEE and to forecast future trends. The findings indicate that, overall, AEE under conservation tillage demonstrates a marked increase compared to conventional tillage, with both systems exhibiting an initial decline followed by an increase over time. However, individual provinces differ significantly in the relative baseline AEE of contrasting tillage systems and trends over time. The long-term evolution of AEE in individual provinces is shaped by a combination of geospatial patterns, initial conditions, and other influencing factors. These findings provide valuable insights for policy formulation, the dissemination of conservation tillage, and the advancement of sustainable agricultural.
常规耕作与保护性耕作农业生态效率的比较评价——以中国为例
实现低碳农业发展是联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)的一项基本目标。保护性耕作在经济、生态和社会方面都表现出明显优于传统耕作的优势。然而,传统耕作与保护性耕作在农业生态效率(AEE)上的差异并没有得到充分的研究。本研究基于2000 - 2020年各省面板数据,结合国家“双碳”目标,构建了不同耕作制度下AEE综合评价指标。采用核密度估计、标准差椭圆模型和马尔可夫链模型进行多层次对比分析,探讨了中国农业电子商务的时空演变趋势,并对未来趋势进行了预测。研究结果表明,总体而言,与传统耕作相比,保护性耕作下的AEE显著增加,两种耕作方式都表现出最初的下降,然后随着时间的推移而增加。然而,不同省份在不同耕作制度和趋势的相对基线AEE上存在显著差异。各省区生态承载力的长期演变是地理空间格局、初始条件和其他影响因素共同作用的结果。这些发现为政策制定、保护性耕作的推广和可持续农业的发展提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信