Patrick Moore , Amarachi Amaugo , Lipika Deka , Lucy Budd , Stephen Ison
{"title":"Modelling the influence of urban morphology on bikeshare station use: a clustering approach","authors":"Patrick Moore , Amarachi Amaugo , Lipika Deka , Lucy Budd , Stephen Ison","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Docked bikeshare schemes have proliferated across UK cities since the first scheme was introduced in 2010. These schemes have been widely adopted for their contributions to decarbonising transport, improving health, and enhancing connectivity through first and last-mile trips. As bikeshare expands to new cities, planners and operators increasingly require a localised understanding of the factors influencing bikeshare use. Urban morphology in UK cities varies widely, however, encompassing differences in street layouts, building design, accessibility, and land use. Meanwhile, industry bikeshare planning guidelines are often broad, without distinguishing between city size and character. These variations pose challenges for bikeshare scheme planning in different settings, emphasising the need for robust, data-driven models that are sensitive to urban context. This paper employs cluster analysis to classify urban areas within several UK cities, with the aim to understand the combined contextual urban factors that influence bikeshare use. This approach, rarely applied in micromobility research, offers a nuanced and unique methodological contribution. The cluster analysis distinguishes between types of residential neighbourhoods, which is a component less commonly incorporated within existing studies. With the data obtained, statistical analysis offers granular insights into the relationship between the built environment and docking station use. It is highlighted that denser residential neighbourhoods with favourable accessibility have consistent associations with trip generation, while accessible suburban neighbourhoods are more varied. The findings have implications for both initial planning and scheme expansion, relevant to station location optimisation, forecasting future demand, fleet size adjustment and integration with existing public transport networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 104676"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Docked bikeshare schemes have proliferated across UK cities since the first scheme was introduced in 2010. These schemes have been widely adopted for their contributions to decarbonising transport, improving health, and enhancing connectivity through first and last-mile trips. As bikeshare expands to new cities, planners and operators increasingly require a localised understanding of the factors influencing bikeshare use. Urban morphology in UK cities varies widely, however, encompassing differences in street layouts, building design, accessibility, and land use. Meanwhile, industry bikeshare planning guidelines are often broad, without distinguishing between city size and character. These variations pose challenges for bikeshare scheme planning in different settings, emphasising the need for robust, data-driven models that are sensitive to urban context. This paper employs cluster analysis to classify urban areas within several UK cities, with the aim to understand the combined contextual urban factors that influence bikeshare use. This approach, rarely applied in micromobility research, offers a nuanced and unique methodological contribution. The cluster analysis distinguishes between types of residential neighbourhoods, which is a component less commonly incorporated within existing studies. With the data obtained, statistical analysis offers granular insights into the relationship between the built environment and docking station use. It is highlighted that denser residential neighbourhoods with favourable accessibility have consistent associations with trip generation, while accessible suburban neighbourhoods are more varied. The findings have implications for both initial planning and scheme expansion, relevant to station location optimisation, forecasting future demand, fleet size adjustment and integration with existing public transport networks.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.