Hemorrhagic pouchitis after bowel preparation with sodium phosphate—based enema: a case report

iGIE Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2025.06.006
Shanshan Wang MD , Huaibin M. Ko MD , Bo Shen MD
{"title":"Hemorrhagic pouchitis after bowel preparation with sodium phosphate—based enema: a case report","authors":"Shanshan Wang MD ,&nbsp;Huaibin M. Ko MD ,&nbsp;Bo Shen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Proper bowel preparation is crucial for endoscopic evaluation and intervention of the ileal pouch; yet, evidence on optimal regimens remains unclear. Although guidelines recommend the polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimens in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, sodium phosphate-based (NaP) enemas often are used for convenience. Although oral NaP has been linked to mucosal injury, similar effects from enemas have not been documented, to our knowledge. We report a case of hemorrhagic pouchitis after an NaP enema use in a patient with Crohn’s disease of the pouch who required repeated endoscopic stricturotomy. Endoscopic hemostatic agents were applied and stricture therapy was deferred to avoid further injury. No other prohemorrhagic causes besides NaP enema were identified. One month later, repeat pouchoscopy using PEG preparation showed no signs of active or recent bleeding, and endoscopic stricturotomy was successfully delivered. NaP enema should be used with caution in patients with an ileal pouch, as they can induce mucosal injury or mimic worsening pouchitis, potentially leading to misdiagnosis and inappropriate management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 261-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708625000792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proper bowel preparation is crucial for endoscopic evaluation and intervention of the ileal pouch; yet, evidence on optimal regimens remains unclear. Although guidelines recommend the polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimens in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, sodium phosphate-based (NaP) enemas often are used for convenience. Although oral NaP has been linked to mucosal injury, similar effects from enemas have not been documented, to our knowledge. We report a case of hemorrhagic pouchitis after an NaP enema use in a patient with Crohn’s disease of the pouch who required repeated endoscopic stricturotomy. Endoscopic hemostatic agents were applied and stricture therapy was deferred to avoid further injury. No other prohemorrhagic causes besides NaP enema were identified. One month later, repeat pouchoscopy using PEG preparation showed no signs of active or recent bleeding, and endoscopic stricturotomy was successfully delivered. NaP enema should be used with caution in patients with an ileal pouch, as they can induce mucosal injury or mimic worsening pouchitis, potentially leading to misdiagnosis and inappropriate management.
磷酸钠灌肠后出血性袋炎1例报告
适当的肠道准备是内镜评估和干预回肠袋的关键;然而,关于最佳方案的证据仍不清楚。尽管指南建议在炎症性肠病患者中使用聚乙二醇(PEG)方案,但出于方便起见,通常使用磷酸钠(NaP)灌肠。尽管口服NaP与粘膜损伤有关,但据我们所知,灌肠的类似效果尚未被记录在案。我们报告一个病例出血性眼袋炎后使用NaP灌肠的病人克罗恩病的眼袋谁需要反复内镜狭窄切除术。内镜下使用止血药物,延迟狭窄治疗以避免进一步损伤。除NaP灌肠外,未发现其他出血性原因。1个月后,使用聚乙二醇制剂进行重复囊镜检查,未发现活动性或近期出血迹象,并成功实施内镜下狭窄切除术。有回肠袋的患者应谨慎使用NaP灌肠,因为它们可引起粘膜损伤或模拟恶化的袋炎,可能导致误诊和不适当的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信