Randomized crossover trial comparing through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy via colonoscope with standard colonoscopy on depth of ileal insertion

iGIE Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2025.06.002
M. Ammar Kalas MD , Luis O. Chavez MD , Ihsan Al-Bayati MD , Nancy Casner MS , Alok K. Dwivedi PhD , Sherif E. Elhanafi MD , Marc J. Zuckerman MD
{"title":"Randomized crossover trial comparing through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy via colonoscope with standard colonoscopy on depth of ileal insertion","authors":"M. Ammar Kalas MD ,&nbsp;Luis O. Chavez MD ,&nbsp;Ihsan Al-Bayati MD ,&nbsp;Nancy Casner MS ,&nbsp;Alok K. Dwivedi PhD ,&nbsp;Sherif E. Elhanafi MD ,&nbsp;Marc J. Zuckerman MD","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Retrograde enteroscopy for evaluation of the small bowel can be performed using through-the-scope balloon-assisted enteroscopy (TTSE). TTSE consists of a balloon catheter designed for anchoring in the small bowel, inserted through the instrument channel of a standard colonoscope. We aimed to assess the ability of TTSE to improve the depth of maximal ileal insertion (DMI) compared with the colonoscope alone (C1).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a prospective, randomized, crossover study to compare the DMI between TTSE and enteroscopy using the adult colonoscope alone. After measuring the DMI by the randomized sequence, the endoscopist switched the technique and measured the DMI again. The primary end point of the study was a comparison of DMI (centimeters) between the colonoscope with TTSE (DMI-N) and the colonoscope alone (DMI-C).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 18 subjects were enrolled, with 9 randomized to colonoscope alone first (C1) followed by TTSE (N2) and 9 to TTSE first (N1) followed by colonoscope alone (C2). The mean (standard deviation) of DMI was DMI-C1: 69.4 (40.3), DMI-N2: 107.2 (62.4), DMI-N1: 92.2 (31.3), and DMI-C2: 102.8 (29.1). Overall, TTSE showed a trend toward an increased DMI compared with the colonoscope alone (difference = 13.61; 95% confidence interval, −3.12 to 30.34; <em>P</em> = .06). In the stratified analyses by the randomization sequence (ie, C1N2), TTSE produced a significant increase in DMI (difference = 37.8; 95% confidence interval, 14.08-61.48; <em>P</em> = .006) compared with the colonoscope alone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As per design-based analysis, the TTSE technique produced an increased DMI ranging between 13.6 and 37.8 cm more than with the standard colonoscope, which trended toward significance. Retrograde enteroscopy using TTSE may help improve DMI compared with colonoscope alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 242-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708625000718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Retrograde enteroscopy for evaluation of the small bowel can be performed using through-the-scope balloon-assisted enteroscopy (TTSE). TTSE consists of a balloon catheter designed for anchoring in the small bowel, inserted through the instrument channel of a standard colonoscope. We aimed to assess the ability of TTSE to improve the depth of maximal ileal insertion (DMI) compared with the colonoscope alone (C1).

Methods

We performed a prospective, randomized, crossover study to compare the DMI between TTSE and enteroscopy using the adult colonoscope alone. After measuring the DMI by the randomized sequence, the endoscopist switched the technique and measured the DMI again. The primary end point of the study was a comparison of DMI (centimeters) between the colonoscope with TTSE (DMI-N) and the colonoscope alone (DMI-C).

Results

A total of 18 subjects were enrolled, with 9 randomized to colonoscope alone first (C1) followed by TTSE (N2) and 9 to TTSE first (N1) followed by colonoscope alone (C2). The mean (standard deviation) of DMI was DMI-C1: 69.4 (40.3), DMI-N2: 107.2 (62.4), DMI-N1: 92.2 (31.3), and DMI-C2: 102.8 (29.1). Overall, TTSE showed a trend toward an increased DMI compared with the colonoscope alone (difference = 13.61; 95% confidence interval, −3.12 to 30.34; P = .06). In the stratified analyses by the randomization sequence (ie, C1N2), TTSE produced a significant increase in DMI (difference = 37.8; 95% confidence interval, 14.08-61.48; P = .006) compared with the colonoscope alone.

Conclusions

As per design-based analysis, the TTSE technique produced an increased DMI ranging between 13.6 and 37.8 cm more than with the standard colonoscope, which trended toward significance. Retrograde enteroscopy using TTSE may help improve DMI compared with colonoscope alone.
随机交叉试验比较经结肠镜与标准结肠镜对回肠插入深度的影响
背景和目的逆行小肠镜检查小肠的评估可以使用经镜气囊辅助小肠镜检查(TTSE)。TTSE包括设计用于锚定小肠的球囊导管,通过标准结肠镜的仪器通道插入。我们的目的是评估与单独结肠镜相比,TTSE提高最大回肠插入深度(DMI)的能力(C1)。方法我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究,比较TTSE和单独使用成人结肠镜的肠镜检查的DMI。在随机顺序测量DMI后,内窥镜医师改变技术并再次测量DMI。该研究的主要终点是比较TTSE结肠镜(DMI- n)和单独结肠镜(DMI- c)的DMI(厘米)。结果共纳入18例受试者,其中9例随机分为先行结肠镜检查(C1)后行TTSE检查(N2)组和先行TTSE检查(N1)后行结肠镜检查(C2)组。DMI的均值(标准差)为DMI- c1: 69.4 (40.3), DMI- n2: 107.2 (62.4), DMI- n1: 92.2 (31.3), DMI- c2: 102.8(29.1)。总体而言,与单独结肠镜检查相比,TTSE有增加DMI的趋势(差异= 13.61;95%可信区间,−3.12 ~ 30.34;P = 0.06)。在随机化序列(即C1N2)的分层分析中,与单独结肠镜相比,TTSE使DMI显著增加(差异= 37.8;95%可信区间为14.08-61.48;P = 0.006)。结论根据设计分析,与标准结肠镜相比,TTSE技术产生的DMI增加了13.6 ~ 37.8 cm,具有显著性趋势。与单独结肠镜相比,使用TTSE的逆行肠镜检查可能有助于改善DMI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信