Matteo Ziacchi MD, PhD , Michele di Silvestro MD , Procolo Marchese MD , Francesco Solimene MD , Vincenzo Paolo Caccavo MD , Gabriele Zanotto MD , Giuseppe Boriani MD, PhD , Antonio dello Russo MD, PhD , Giuseppe Speziale MD, PhD , Marco Barbanti MD, PhD , Carlotta Fornasini MD , Mauro Biffi MD , Saverio Iacopino MD
{"title":"Effectiveness of cardiac device envelopes in preventing infections among pacemaker patients: The REINFORCE Brady real-world project","authors":"Matteo Ziacchi MD, PhD , Michele di Silvestro MD , Procolo Marchese MD , Francesco Solimene MD , Vincenzo Paolo Caccavo MD , Gabriele Zanotto MD , Giuseppe Boriani MD, PhD , Antonio dello Russo MD, PhD , Giuseppe Speziale MD, PhD , Marco Barbanti MD, PhD , Carlotta Fornasini MD , Mauro Biffi MD , Saverio Iacopino MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Infections related to cardiac implantable electrical devices are among the most challenging and costly complications. Although the absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope has shown efficacy in reducing infection risk, data on its use in pacemaker (PM) and cardiac resynchronization therapy PM (CRT-P) devices are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the TYRX envelope in preventing systemic and pocket infections in patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, multicenter analysis included 896 patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision between August 2020 and April 2024. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: the envelope group (n = 350), receiving the TYRX envelope, and the control group (n = 546).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 2.1 years, systemic or pocket infections occurred in 1.2% of patients, with significantly fewer infections in the envelope group (0.3%) than the control group (1.8%) (<em>P</em> = .05). The envelope was associated with an 89% reduction in infection risk (incidence rate ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.23, <em>P</em> < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that, at 4 years, the cumulative incidence of infection was 0.4% in the envelope group vs 2.5% in the control group (hazard ratio 7.36, <em>P</em> = .03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with PMs and CRT-Ps, the use of the TYRX envelope is associated with significantly lower occurrence of device-related infections. This benefit was sustained over long-term follow-up, supporting its effectiveness in routine clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 9","pages":"Pages 1356-1363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825002302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Infections related to cardiac implantable electrical devices are among the most challenging and costly complications. Although the absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope has shown efficacy in reducing infection risk, data on its use in pacemaker (PM) and cardiac resynchronization therapy PM (CRT-P) devices are limited.
Objectives
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the TYRX envelope in preventing systemic and pocket infections in patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision.
Methods
This retrospective, multicenter analysis included 896 patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision between August 2020 and April 2024. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: the envelope group (n = 350), receiving the TYRX envelope, and the control group (n = 546).
Results
Over a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 2.1 years, systemic or pocket infections occurred in 1.2% of patients, with significantly fewer infections in the envelope group (0.3%) than the control group (1.8%) (P = .05). The envelope was associated with an 89% reduction in infection risk (incidence rate ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.23, P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that, at 4 years, the cumulative incidence of infection was 0.4% in the envelope group vs 2.5% in the control group (hazard ratio 7.36, P = .03).
Conclusions
In patients with PMs and CRT-Ps, the use of the TYRX envelope is associated with significantly lower occurrence of device-related infections. This benefit was sustained over long-term follow-up, supporting its effectiveness in routine clinical practice.