Effectiveness of cardiac device envelopes in preventing infections among pacemaker patients: The REINFORCE Brady real-world project

IF 2.9 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Matteo Ziacchi MD, PhD , Michele di Silvestro MD , Procolo Marchese MD , Francesco Solimene MD , Vincenzo Paolo Caccavo MD , Gabriele Zanotto MD , Giuseppe Boriani MD, PhD , Antonio dello Russo MD, PhD , Giuseppe Speziale MD, PhD , Marco Barbanti MD, PhD , Carlotta Fornasini MD , Mauro Biffi MD , Saverio Iacopino MD
{"title":"Effectiveness of cardiac device envelopes in preventing infections among pacemaker patients: The REINFORCE Brady real-world project","authors":"Matteo Ziacchi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Michele di Silvestro MD ,&nbsp;Procolo Marchese MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Solimene MD ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Paolo Caccavo MD ,&nbsp;Gabriele Zanotto MD ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Boriani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Antonio dello Russo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Speziale MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marco Barbanti MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlotta Fornasini MD ,&nbsp;Mauro Biffi MD ,&nbsp;Saverio Iacopino MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Infections related to cardiac implantable electrical devices are among the most challenging and costly complications. Although the absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope has shown efficacy in reducing infection risk, data on its use in pacemaker (PM) and cardiac resynchronization therapy PM (CRT-P) devices are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the TYRX envelope in preventing systemic and pocket infections in patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, multicenter analysis included 896 patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision between August 2020 and April 2024. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: the envelope group (n = 350), receiving the TYRX envelope, and the control group (n = 546).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 2.1 years, systemic or pocket infections occurred in 1.2% of patients, with significantly fewer infections in the envelope group (0.3%) than the control group (1.8%) (<em>P</em> = .05). The envelope was associated with an 89% reduction in infection risk (incidence rate ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.23, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that, at 4 years, the cumulative incidence of infection was 0.4% in the envelope group vs 2.5% in the control group (hazard ratio 7.36, <em>P</em> = .03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with PMs and CRT-Ps, the use of the TYRX envelope is associated with significantly lower occurrence of device-related infections. This benefit was sustained over long-term follow-up, supporting its effectiveness in routine clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 9","pages":"Pages 1356-1363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825002302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Infections related to cardiac implantable electrical devices are among the most challenging and costly complications. Although the absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope has shown efficacy in reducing infection risk, data on its use in pacemaker (PM) and cardiac resynchronization therapy PM (CRT-P) devices are limited.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the TYRX envelope in preventing systemic and pocket infections in patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision.

Methods

This retrospective, multicenter analysis included 896 patients undergoing PM or CRT-P implantation or revision between August 2020 and April 2024. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: the envelope group (n = 350), receiving the TYRX envelope, and the control group (n = 546).

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 2.1 years, systemic or pocket infections occurred in 1.2% of patients, with significantly fewer infections in the envelope group (0.3%) than the control group (1.8%) (P = .05). The envelope was associated with an 89% reduction in infection risk (incidence rate ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.23, P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that, at 4 years, the cumulative incidence of infection was 0.4% in the envelope group vs 2.5% in the control group (hazard ratio 7.36, P = .03).

Conclusions

In patients with PMs and CRT-Ps, the use of the TYRX envelope is associated with significantly lower occurrence of device-related infections. This benefit was sustained over long-term follow-up, supporting its effectiveness in routine clinical practice.

Abstract Image

心脏装置包膜预防心脏起搏器患者感染的有效性:强化布雷迪现实世界项目
与心脏植入式电子装置相关的感染是最具挑战性和最昂贵的并发症之一。虽然可吸收的抗生素洗脱包膜已显示出降低感染风险的功效,但其在起搏器(PM)和心脏再同步化治疗PM (CRT-P)装置中的应用数据有限。目的本研究旨在评估TYRX包膜在PM或CRT-P植入或翻修患者中预防全身和口袋感染的有效性。方法回顾性、多中心分析了896例在2020年8月至2024年4月期间接受PM或CRT-P植入或翻修的患者。将患者分为两组:包膜组(n = 350),接受TYRX包膜,对照组(n = 546)。结果在平均2.2±2.1年的随访中,1.2%的患者发生全身或口袋感染,包膜组感染发生率(0.3%)明显低于对照组(1.8%)(P = 0.05)。包膜与感染风险降低89%相关(发病率比0.11,95%可信区间0.05-0.23,P < 0.001)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,4年时,包膜组的累计感染发生率为0.4%,对照组为2.5%(风险比为7.36,P = 0.03)。结论在pm和CRT-Ps患者中,使用TYRX包膜可显著降低器械相关感染的发生率。这种益处在长期随访中持续存在,支持其在常规临床实践中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信