{"title":"Spatiotemporal tissue temperature during cryoablation using different balloons","authors":"Akio Chikata MD, PhD , Takeshi Kato MD, PhD , Hiroaki Ide MEng , Tatsuya Fukutani MEng , Shuhei Fujita MD, PhD , Kazuo Usuda MD, PhD , Michiro Maruyama MD, PhD , Kan-ichi Otowa MD, PhD , Takashi Kusayama MD, PhD , Kenshi Hayashi MD, PhD , Masayuki Takamura MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Differences in tissue temperature trends and distribution between two commercially available balloons during cryoablation remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to evaluate spatiotemporal tissue temperatures during cryoablation using different cryoballoons.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An in vitro pulmonary vein model was constructed from porcine myocardial tissue to simulate pulmonary vein anatomy and venous flow. A multitemperature sensor sheet was placed behind the muscles. After confirming pulmonary vein occlusion, cryoablation was performed using the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro) and POLARx FIT (28 and 31 mm) to evaluate the time course of spatial tissue temperatures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>POLARx FIT 28 mm showed the lowest force for pulmonary vein (5.5 ± 1.0 N for AFA-Pro, 4.0 ± 0.8 N for POLARx FIT 28 mm, and 4.1 ± 0.7 N for POLARx FIT 31 mm, respectively (<em>P</em> < .05; POLARx FIT 28 mm vs AFA-Pro), and the lowest tissue temperature after 180 seconds of cryoablation (−44.7 ± 2.3°C for AFA-Pro, −50.1 ± 5.7°C for POLARx FIT 28 mm, and, −44.7 ± 2.4°C for POLARx FIT 31 mm, respectively (<em>P</em> < .05; POLARx FIT, 28 mm vs AFA-Pro and POLARx FIT, 31 mm). Multipoint sensor analysis revealed that only POLARx FIT 28 mm achieved a tissue temperature < −50°C, while the POLARx FIT 31 mm created a significantly larger area with a tissue temperature of −30°C or lower.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Among commercially available balloons, the POLARx FIT of 28 mm achieved the greatest tissue temperature drop, whereas the POLARx FIT of 31 mm created the broadest cooled tissue area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 9","pages":"Pages 1428-1434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825002065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Differences in tissue temperature trends and distribution between two commercially available balloons during cryoablation remain unclear.
Objective
We sought to evaluate spatiotemporal tissue temperatures during cryoablation using different cryoballoons.
Methods
An in vitro pulmonary vein model was constructed from porcine myocardial tissue to simulate pulmonary vein anatomy and venous flow. A multitemperature sensor sheet was placed behind the muscles. After confirming pulmonary vein occlusion, cryoablation was performed using the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro) and POLARx FIT (28 and 31 mm) to evaluate the time course of spatial tissue temperatures.
Results
POLARx FIT 28 mm showed the lowest force for pulmonary vein (5.5 ± 1.0 N for AFA-Pro, 4.0 ± 0.8 N for POLARx FIT 28 mm, and 4.1 ± 0.7 N for POLARx FIT 31 mm, respectively (P < .05; POLARx FIT 28 mm vs AFA-Pro), and the lowest tissue temperature after 180 seconds of cryoablation (−44.7 ± 2.3°C for AFA-Pro, −50.1 ± 5.7°C for POLARx FIT 28 mm, and, −44.7 ± 2.4°C for POLARx FIT 31 mm, respectively (P < .05; POLARx FIT, 28 mm vs AFA-Pro and POLARx FIT, 31 mm). Multipoint sensor analysis revealed that only POLARx FIT 28 mm achieved a tissue temperature < −50°C, while the POLARx FIT 31 mm created a significantly larger area with a tissue temperature of −30°C or lower.
Conclusion
Among commercially available balloons, the POLARx FIT of 28 mm achieved the greatest tissue temperature drop, whereas the POLARx FIT of 31 mm created the broadest cooled tissue area.