Systematic review of chronic fatigue syndrome treatment methodology

Sergio López Barbeta , Manuela Carrión Martínez , Alejandro Lendínez Mesa , Alberto Diliz Vieira , Carlos Díaz-Rodríguez
{"title":"Systematic review of chronic fatigue syndrome treatment methodology","authors":"Sergio López Barbeta ,&nbsp;Manuela Carrión Martínez ,&nbsp;Alejandro Lendínez Mesa ,&nbsp;Alberto Diliz Vieira ,&nbsp;Carlos Díaz-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.sedeng.2024.100164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span>Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a highly prevalent pathology that has not been clearly defined. Currently, there is no universally accepted treatment protocol, and the </span>diagnostic markers<span>, etiology, and specific pathophysiology for developing effective non-pharmacological treatments remain unknown.</span></div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the currently established rehabilitation treatment methodologies for CFS. In addition, to establish an analysis of the efficacy of the treatment plans studied and to determine advances on the etiology of CFS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review<span> of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published since 2011 was conducted. Studies evaluating non-pharmacological interventions for adult CFS patients were included, differentiating them according to chosen diagnostic criteria and variable measurement. The treatment hypothesis of the selected interventions was also taken into account.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>17 RCTs were included, 6 of which based their performance protocol on a self-management booklet and 11 of which did so through face-to-face involvement of a therapist and active therapy. The results of these studies were assessed primarily by patient-reported outcomes, and 5 of these studies reported on objective outcome measures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is no significant evidence on the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in CFS patients. In addition, the lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria makes it difficult to compare studies and to develop a standardised treatment plan. Advances in the aetiology and pathophysiology of CFS point to the need for a broader therapeutic approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101097,"journal":{"name":"Revista Científica de la Sociedad de Enfermería Neurológica (English ed.)","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 100164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Científica de la Sociedad de Enfermería Neurológica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530299X24000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a highly prevalent pathology that has not been clearly defined. Currently, there is no universally accepted treatment protocol, and the diagnostic markers, etiology, and specific pathophysiology for developing effective non-pharmacological treatments remain unknown.

Objective

To determine the currently established rehabilitation treatment methodologies for CFS. In addition, to establish an analysis of the efficacy of the treatment plans studied and to determine advances on the etiology of CFS.

Methods

A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published since 2011 was conducted. Studies evaluating non-pharmacological interventions for adult CFS patients were included, differentiating them according to chosen diagnostic criteria and variable measurement. The treatment hypothesis of the selected interventions was also taken into account.

Results

17 RCTs were included, 6 of which based their performance protocol on a self-management booklet and 11 of which did so through face-to-face involvement of a therapist and active therapy. The results of these studies were assessed primarily by patient-reported outcomes, and 5 of these studies reported on objective outcome measures.

Conclusion

There is no significant evidence on the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in CFS patients. In addition, the lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria makes it difficult to compare studies and to develop a standardised treatment plan. Advances in the aetiology and pathophysiology of CFS point to the need for a broader therapeutic approach.
慢性疲劳综合征治疗方法学的系统综述
慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)是一种非常普遍但尚未明确定义的病理。目前,尚无普遍接受的治疗方案,开发有效的非药物治疗的诊断标志物、病因学和特定病理生理学仍然未知。目的探讨慢性疲劳综合症的康复治疗方法。此外,对所研究的治疗方案的疗效进行分析,并确定CFS病因学的进展。方法对2011年以来发表的随机临床试验(RCTs)进行系统回顾。纳入评估成人CFS患者非药物干预措施的研究,根据选择的诊断标准和变量测量进行区分。所选干预措施的治疗假设也被考虑在内。结果共纳入17项随机对照试验,其中6项基于自我管理手册的表现方案,11项通过治疗师面对面参与和积极治疗来实现。这些研究的结果主要通过患者报告的结果进行评估,其中5项研究报告了客观结果测量。结论非药物干预对慢性疲劳综合症患者的疗效尚无显著证据。此外,对诊断标准缺乏共识使得比较研究和制定标准化治疗计划变得困难。CFS病因学和病理生理学的进展表明需要更广泛的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信