Evaluating the water quality of Brazilian distribution companies by the grey-TOPSIS method

IF 4.4 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Pamella Gomes da Silva Farias , Maisa Mendonça Silva , Saulo de Tarso Marques Bezerra
{"title":"Evaluating the water quality of Brazilian distribution companies by the grey-TOPSIS method","authors":"Pamella Gomes da Silva Farias ,&nbsp;Maisa Mendonça Silva ,&nbsp;Saulo de Tarso Marques Bezerra","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article proposes the use of water quality indicators to evaluate water distribution companies employing a multicriteria analysis that encompasses the Grey theory and the TOPSIS method. The main benefit of the framework is the generation of a final comparative ranking, which may assist managers, regulatory agencies, investors, users, society, and providers themselves in visualizing the quality performance of the companies analyzed. The results of applying the proposed framework to Brazilian companies proved robust after a two-step sensitivity analysis, which involved varying weights and excluding criteria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102057"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001729","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article proposes the use of water quality indicators to evaluate water distribution companies employing a multicriteria analysis that encompasses the Grey theory and the TOPSIS method. The main benefit of the framework is the generation of a final comparative ranking, which may assist managers, regulatory agencies, investors, users, society, and providers themselves in visualizing the quality performance of the companies analyzed. The results of applying the proposed framework to Brazilian companies proved robust after a two-step sensitivity analysis, which involved varying weights and excluding criteria.
用灰色topsis法评价巴西配电公司的水质
本文建议使用水质指标来评价供水公司,采用多标准分析,包括灰色理论和TOPSIS方法。该框架的主要好处是产生一个最终的比较排名,这可以帮助管理者、监管机构、投资者、用户、社会和供应商自己可视化所分析公司的质量表现。经过两步敏感性分析(涉及不同权重和排除标准),将拟议框架应用于巴西公司的结果证明是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信