Comparison of hydro-pumped and green hydrogen as energy storage processes: A case study on Kefalonia Island, Greece

IF 5.8 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A.-F. Papathanasiou, G. Pasaniotis, E. Baltas
{"title":"Comparison of hydro-pumped and green hydrogen as energy storage processes: A case study on Kefalonia Island, Greece","authors":"A.-F. Papathanasiou,&nbsp;G. Pasaniotis,&nbsp;E. Baltas","doi":"10.1016/j.scp.2025.102216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present research work investigates the performance of two large-scale energy storage technologies: hydro-pumped storage (HPS) and green hydrogen production, within a hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) developed for Kefalonia Island, Greece. Given the island's seasonal water and electricity shortages driven by summer demand and limited infrastructure, the goal is to identify which storage option better supports local autonomy. Two scenarios, differing only in storage method, were simulated using identical wind input and desalination setup. Performance was evaluated based on climate and demand data, focusing on water and electricity needs. Both scenarios achieved 99.9 % potable water coverage. The HPS system exhibited notably higher energy efficiency (67 %) compared to hydrogen (33 %), and produced slightly more desalinated water, reaching 18,157,791 m<sup>3</sup> versus 17,986,544 m<sup>3</sup> respectively. Electricity demand coverage reached 77.8 % with HPS and 76.0 % with hydrogen, while irrigation demand was met by 80.2 % and 79.4 %, respectively. Seasonal storage analysis revealed pronounced summer depletion in both cases due to high demand and low wind availability, with HPS recovering faster and maintaining higher storage levels owing to lower energy losses. The comparison underscores the need for storage strategies adapted to island-specific water and energy dynamics. HPS is more efficient for short-to-medium-term needs, while green hydrogen offers potential for long-duration storage and deeper decarbonization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22138,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 102216"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352554125003146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present research work investigates the performance of two large-scale energy storage technologies: hydro-pumped storage (HPS) and green hydrogen production, within a hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) developed for Kefalonia Island, Greece. Given the island's seasonal water and electricity shortages driven by summer demand and limited infrastructure, the goal is to identify which storage option better supports local autonomy. Two scenarios, differing only in storage method, were simulated using identical wind input and desalination setup. Performance was evaluated based on climate and demand data, focusing on water and electricity needs. Both scenarios achieved 99.9 % potable water coverage. The HPS system exhibited notably higher energy efficiency (67 %) compared to hydrogen (33 %), and produced slightly more desalinated water, reaching 18,157,791 m3 versus 17,986,544 m3 respectively. Electricity demand coverage reached 77.8 % with HPS and 76.0 % with hydrogen, while irrigation demand was met by 80.2 % and 79.4 %, respectively. Seasonal storage analysis revealed pronounced summer depletion in both cases due to high demand and low wind availability, with HPS recovering faster and maintaining higher storage levels owing to lower energy losses. The comparison underscores the need for storage strategies adapted to island-specific water and energy dynamics. HPS is more efficient for short-to-medium-term needs, while green hydrogen offers potential for long-duration storage and deeper decarbonization.

Abstract Image

抽水蓄能和绿色蓄能的比较:以希腊凯法利尼亚岛为例
目前的研究工作调查了两种大规模储能技术的性能:在为希腊Kefalonia岛开发的混合可再生能源系统(HRES)内的抽水蓄能(HPS)和绿色制氢。考虑到夏季需求和有限的基础设施导致的岛上季节性水电短缺,目标是确定哪种存储选项更能支持地方自治。使用相同的风输入和海水淡化装置模拟了两种情况,仅在存储方法上有所不同。绩效评估基于气候和需求数据,重点关注水电需求。两种方案都实现了99.9%的饮用水覆盖率。HPS系统的能源效率(67%)明显高于氢系统(33%),并且产生的淡化水略多,分别达到18,157,791 m3和17,986,544 m3。HPS和氢气的电力需求覆盖率分别达到77.8%和76.0%,灌溉需求分别达到80.2%和79.4%。季节性存储分析显示,由于高需求和低风力可用性,两种情况下夏季都明显枯竭,HPS恢复得更快,并且由于能量损失更低而保持更高的存储水平。这种比较强调了需要适应岛屿特定的水和能源动态的储存策略。HPS更有效地满足中短期需求,而绿色氢提供了长期储存和深度脱碳的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy publishes research that is related to chemistry, pharmacy and sustainability science in a forward oriented manner. It provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the intersection and overlap of chemistry and pharmacy on the one hand and sustainability on the other hand. This includes contributions related to increasing sustainability of chemistry and pharmaceutical science and industries itself as well as their products in relation to the contribution of these to sustainability itself. As an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal it addresses all sustainability related issues along the life cycle of chemical and pharmaceutical products form resource related topics until the end of life of products. This includes not only natural science based approaches and issues but also from humanities, social science and economics as far as they are dealing with sustainability related to chemistry and pharmacy. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy aims at bridging between disciplines as well as developing and developed countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信