AI’s energy paradox: Governing the trilemma of security, justice, and sustainability

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Vlado Vivoda , Danilo Borja , Ghaleb Krame
{"title":"AI’s energy paradox: Governing the trilemma of security, justice, and sustainability","authors":"Vlado Vivoda ,&nbsp;Danilo Borja ,&nbsp;Ghaleb Krame","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming economies and infrastructures, but its accelerating electricity demand poses new governance challenges across the energy trilemma of security, justice, and sustainability. This paper offers a conceptual and policy-oriented analysis of AI’s expanding energy footprint through the 4As framework—availability, accessibility, affordability, and acceptance—nested within the trilemma. It positions itself as a synthesis of empirical evidence and anticipatory projections to clarify current impacts while mapping uncertain futures. The analysis demonstrates that AI’s energy impacts are characterised by uncertainty, regional variation, and rebound effects, requiring careful qualification of projections. High-profile scenarios such as mega data-centre projects or market forecasts illustrate possible trajectories, but they must be situated within broader ranges and benchmarks to avoid unwarranted determinism. The paper identifies justice implications of uneven AI adoption, sustainability risks from concentrated infrastructure, and opportunities for anticipatory governance. It concludes with policy recommendations classified by governance level, emphasising transparency, international coordination, and a forward-looking research agenda on the political economy of AI and energy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 101773"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25001625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming economies and infrastructures, but its accelerating electricity demand poses new governance challenges across the energy trilemma of security, justice, and sustainability. This paper offers a conceptual and policy-oriented analysis of AI’s expanding energy footprint through the 4As framework—availability, accessibility, affordability, and acceptance—nested within the trilemma. It positions itself as a synthesis of empirical evidence and anticipatory projections to clarify current impacts while mapping uncertain futures. The analysis demonstrates that AI’s energy impacts are characterised by uncertainty, regional variation, and rebound effects, requiring careful qualification of projections. High-profile scenarios such as mega data-centre projects or market forecasts illustrate possible trajectories, but they must be situated within broader ranges and benchmarks to avoid unwarranted determinism. The paper identifies justice implications of uneven AI adoption, sustainability risks from concentrated infrastructure, and opportunities for anticipatory governance. It concludes with policy recommendations classified by governance level, emphasising transparency, international coordination, and a forward-looking research agenda on the political economy of AI and energy.
人工智能的能源悖论:治理安全、正义和可持续性的三难困境
人工智能(AI)正在迅速改变经济和基础设施,但其不断增长的电力需求在能源安全、正义和可持续性的三难困境中提出了新的治理挑战。本文通过在三难困境中嵌套的4As框架(可用性、可及性、可负担性和可接受性)对人工智能不断扩大的能源足迹进行了概念和政策导向的分析。它将自己定位为经验证据和预期预测的综合,以澄清当前的影响,同时绘制不确定的未来。分析表明,人工智能的能源影响具有不确定性、区域差异和反弹效应的特点,需要仔细确定预测结果。大型数据中心项目或市场预测等引人注目的场景说明了可能的轨迹,但它们必须位于更广泛的范围和基准内,以避免毫无根据的确定性。本文确定了人工智能应用不均衡的司法影响、基础设施集中化带来的可持续性风险以及预期治理的机会。报告最后提出了按治理水平分类的政策建议,强调透明度、国际协调以及关于人工智能和能源的政治经济学的前瞻性研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信