Climate physical risks and technological innovation in the grain industry chain: an empirical analysis based on machine learning of patent texts in China
{"title":"Climate physical risks and technological innovation in the grain industry chain: an empirical analysis based on machine learning of patent texts in China","authors":"Xiaobing Gu, Junfeng Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Climate change-induced physical risks are permeating the entire grain industry chain (GIC), triggering systemic restructuring pressures. While global adaptive responses increasingly prioritize technological innovation as the most promising solution, empirical validation remains scarce due to measurement challenges in quantifying GIC technology innovation (GICTI). Critically, prior studies focus narrowly on single production segments, lacking a deconstruction of innovation responses across the full chain. This also leaves the linkage mechanism between climate physical risks and different innovation types still in a black box, hindering effective policy-making.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigates the structural impacts of climate physical risks on GICTI: 1) Quantify risk effects across five segments: pre-production R&D segment, cultivation-harvest segment, storage-transport-processing segment, distribution-consumption segment, and whole-chain technologies; 2) Measure asymmetric effects on disruptive versus incremental innovation; 3) Verify the pivotal role of R&D capital allocation in risk transmission; 4) Identify regional heterogeneity patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>1) Innovation measurement: Using Chinese GIC patent data, we constructed a multi-level semantic analysis framework with machine learning: BERT model decoded patent abstracts to classify innovations into specific chain segments; BGE model transformed text into semantic vectors, identifying disruptive/incremental technological innovations via average vector distance thresholds. 2) Climate physical risk quantification: Provincial climate physical risk indices were developed from multi-dimensional perspectives. 3) Empirical analysis: Bidirectional fixed-effects models examined the impacts and mechanisms of climate risks on innovation levels/structure across Chinese provinces (2004–2023).</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>1) Climate physical risks exhibit significant long-term driving effects on GICTI. 2) Structural heterogeneity prevails: Cultivation-harvest and storage-transport-processing segments show robust positive responses, while incremental innovation responds more systematically than disruptive innovation. 3) Mechanistically, R&D capital deepening constitutes the core transmission channel, though excessive R&D intensity and private-public R&D investment ratios substantially weaken innovation incentives. 4) Regionally, innovation responsiveness is significantly stronger in grain-producing provinces and western China.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>1) Methodologically, the BERT-BGE dual-model framework transcends IPC coding limitations, establishing a replicable paradigm for industry-specific innovation measurement. 2) Theoretically, we empirically integrate climate physical risks, chain-wide innovation, and spatial heterogeneity, unraveling risk-innovation dynamics and advancing climate-adaptive agriculture and innovation economics. 3) Practically, findings enable diagnosis of regional innovation gaps, optimization of climate-adaptive R&D resource allocation, and targeted policy formulation for differentiated innovation incentives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104507"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25002471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
Climate change-induced physical risks are permeating the entire grain industry chain (GIC), triggering systemic restructuring pressures. While global adaptive responses increasingly prioritize technological innovation as the most promising solution, empirical validation remains scarce due to measurement challenges in quantifying GIC technology innovation (GICTI). Critically, prior studies focus narrowly on single production segments, lacking a deconstruction of innovation responses across the full chain. This also leaves the linkage mechanism between climate physical risks and different innovation types still in a black box, hindering effective policy-making.
Objective
This study investigates the structural impacts of climate physical risks on GICTI: 1) Quantify risk effects across five segments: pre-production R&D segment, cultivation-harvest segment, storage-transport-processing segment, distribution-consumption segment, and whole-chain technologies; 2) Measure asymmetric effects on disruptive versus incremental innovation; 3) Verify the pivotal role of R&D capital allocation in risk transmission; 4) Identify regional heterogeneity patterns.
Methods
1) Innovation measurement: Using Chinese GIC patent data, we constructed a multi-level semantic analysis framework with machine learning: BERT model decoded patent abstracts to classify innovations into specific chain segments; BGE model transformed text into semantic vectors, identifying disruptive/incremental technological innovations via average vector distance thresholds. 2) Climate physical risk quantification: Provincial climate physical risk indices were developed from multi-dimensional perspectives. 3) Empirical analysis: Bidirectional fixed-effects models examined the impacts and mechanisms of climate risks on innovation levels/structure across Chinese provinces (2004–2023).
Results and conclusions
1) Climate physical risks exhibit significant long-term driving effects on GICTI. 2) Structural heterogeneity prevails: Cultivation-harvest and storage-transport-processing segments show robust positive responses, while incremental innovation responds more systematically than disruptive innovation. 3) Mechanistically, R&D capital deepening constitutes the core transmission channel, though excessive R&D intensity and private-public R&D investment ratios substantially weaken innovation incentives. 4) Regionally, innovation responsiveness is significantly stronger in grain-producing provinces and western China.
Significance
1) Methodologically, the BERT-BGE dual-model framework transcends IPC coding limitations, establishing a replicable paradigm for industry-specific innovation measurement. 2) Theoretically, we empirically integrate climate physical risks, chain-wide innovation, and spatial heterogeneity, unraveling risk-innovation dynamics and advancing climate-adaptive agriculture and innovation economics. 3) Practically, findings enable diagnosis of regional innovation gaps, optimization of climate-adaptive R&D resource allocation, and targeted policy formulation for differentiated innovation incentives.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.