Optimizing forest defoliation detection using remote sensing data: a multi–resolution approach using machine learning algorithms

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY
Rajeev Bhattarai , Parinaz Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran
{"title":"Optimizing forest defoliation detection using remote sensing data: a multi–resolution approach using machine learning algorithms","authors":"Rajeev Bhattarai ,&nbsp;Parinaz Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Remote sensing technologies, particularly satellite-based imagery, offer an effective means to monitor large-scale forest disturbances including pest-induced defoliation. This study investigates the use of multi-source remote sensing data, specifically PlanetScope (3 m spatial resolution) and Sentinel-2 (10 m and 20 m spatial resolution), combined with derived spectral vegetation indices (SVIs), to detect disturbances like spruce budworm (SBW)-induced defoliation in northeastern USA. We comprehensively evaluated the performance of various model building scenarios incorporating sensor types as well as spatial and spectral resolutions for SBW defoliation detection. Three machine learning algorithms—random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP)—were applied to model defoliation at a landscape scale. The RF algorithm outperformed the others in defoliation detection. Five models using various Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope band combinations were evaluated, and all produced low error rates. The model based on Sentinel-2 (20 m resolution), using all bands and SVIs (Model V), provided the best performance with a modeling error of 6.1 % followed by Sentinel-2 variables (20 m resolution) with bands and SVIs comparable to PlanetScope (Model III) with a modeling error of 7.6 %. The PlanetScope-based model (Model I) had a modeling error of 11.4 %. The Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) and Modified Simple Ratio (MSR) were the most effective indices for detecting defoliation. However, SVIs selection was affected by the timing of image acquisition. Models based on a combination of SVIs related to canopy structure, stress, and biochemistry resulted in similar accuracy levels (error range: 6.1 %-9.1 %). The models suggested in this study can be used for timely SBW defoliation at landscape scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 101009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325002353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote sensing technologies, particularly satellite-based imagery, offer an effective means to monitor large-scale forest disturbances including pest-induced defoliation. This study investigates the use of multi-source remote sensing data, specifically PlanetScope (3 m spatial resolution) and Sentinel-2 (10 m and 20 m spatial resolution), combined with derived spectral vegetation indices (SVIs), to detect disturbances like spruce budworm (SBW)-induced defoliation in northeastern USA. We comprehensively evaluated the performance of various model building scenarios incorporating sensor types as well as spatial and spectral resolutions for SBW defoliation detection. Three machine learning algorithms—random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP)—were applied to model defoliation at a landscape scale. The RF algorithm outperformed the others in defoliation detection. Five models using various Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope band combinations were evaluated, and all produced low error rates. The model based on Sentinel-2 (20 m resolution), using all bands and SVIs (Model V), provided the best performance with a modeling error of 6.1 % followed by Sentinel-2 variables (20 m resolution) with bands and SVIs comparable to PlanetScope (Model III) with a modeling error of 7.6 %. The PlanetScope-based model (Model I) had a modeling error of 11.4 %. The Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) and Modified Simple Ratio (MSR) were the most effective indices for detecting defoliation. However, SVIs selection was affected by the timing of image acquisition. Models based on a combination of SVIs related to canopy structure, stress, and biochemistry resulted in similar accuracy levels (error range: 6.1 %-9.1 %). The models suggested in this study can be used for timely SBW defoliation at landscape scale.
利用遥感数据优化森林落叶检测:使用机器学习算法的多分辨率方法
遥感技术,特别是基于卫星的图像,提供了监测大规模森林干扰,包括虫害引起的落叶的有效手段。本研究利用多源遥感数据,特别是PlanetScope (3 m空间分辨率)和Sentinel-2 (10 m和20 m空间分辨率),结合衍生的光谱植被指数(SVIs),探测美国东北部云杉budworm (SBW)引起的落叶等干扰。我们综合评估了各种模型构建场景的性能,包括传感器类型以及用于SBW落叶检测的空间和光谱分辨率。采用随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和多层感知机(MLP)三种机器学习算法对景观尺度下的落叶进行建模。射频算法在落叶检测方面优于其他算法。使用不同的Sentinel-2和PlanetScope波段组合的五个模型进行了评估,所有模型的错误率都很低。基于Sentinel-2 (20 m分辨率)的模型,使用所有波段和svi(模型V),其建模误差为6.1%,表现最佳;其次是基于Sentinel-2 (20 m分辨率)的模型,其波段和svi与PlanetScope(模型III)相当,建模误差为7.6%。基于planetscope的模型(模型I)的建模误差为11.4%。土壤调整植被指数(SAVI)和修正简单比(MSR)是检测落叶最有效的指标。然而,svi的选择受图像采集时间的影响。基于与冠层结构、应力和生物化学相关的svi组合的模型得出了相似的精度水平(误差范围:6.1% - 9.1%)。本研究提出的模型可用于在景观尺度上及时进行SBW落叶处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信