From models to markets: A systematic review of forest carbon sequestration costs

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY
Yan Niu , Xiaowen Wang , Aixin Geng , Hongqiang Yang
{"title":"From models to markets: A systematic review of forest carbon sequestration costs","authors":"Yan Niu ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Wang ,&nbsp;Aixin Geng ,&nbsp;Hongqiang Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest carbon sequestration projects play a crucial role in achieving global carbon neutrality goals and addressing climate change challenges. A systematic review of literature on carbon sequestration costs is essential to improve the accuracy of calculations, ensure the economic feasibility of projects, and promote active carbon market transactions. This paper systematically reviews the main estimation methods and influencing factors of forest carbon sequestration costs based on existing literature, and compares cost estimates across countries within a full life cycle cost framework of forest carbon sequestration projects. The findings are as follows: the accounting methods for forest carbon sequestration costs include the afforestation cost method, opportunity cost method, comprehensive cost method, and minimum carbon price method, the latter of which is currently the most comprehensive and accurate for cost evaluation. Results also reveal that the influencing factors of forest carbon sequestration costs exhibit three core patterns, that is, the widespread presence of “nonlinearity”, “policy–market duality”, and “natural–artificial substitution relationship”. Moreover, across the full project life cycle, the four major cost categories are afforestation costs, maintenance costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs. Significant differences are found in cost estimates across countries and regions, and methodological choices also have a great impact on estimation results, thus affecting the reliability of cross-regional comparisons. Summarizing research progress on forest carbon sequestration costs can provide theoretical support for the implementation of forest carbon sequestration projects and market transactions, helping to achieve carbon neutrality goals and promote future sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 101008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325002341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest carbon sequestration projects play a crucial role in achieving global carbon neutrality goals and addressing climate change challenges. A systematic review of literature on carbon sequestration costs is essential to improve the accuracy of calculations, ensure the economic feasibility of projects, and promote active carbon market transactions. This paper systematically reviews the main estimation methods and influencing factors of forest carbon sequestration costs based on existing literature, and compares cost estimates across countries within a full life cycle cost framework of forest carbon sequestration projects. The findings are as follows: the accounting methods for forest carbon sequestration costs include the afforestation cost method, opportunity cost method, comprehensive cost method, and minimum carbon price method, the latter of which is currently the most comprehensive and accurate for cost evaluation. Results also reveal that the influencing factors of forest carbon sequestration costs exhibit three core patterns, that is, the widespread presence of “nonlinearity”, “policy–market duality”, and “natural–artificial substitution relationship”. Moreover, across the full project life cycle, the four major cost categories are afforestation costs, maintenance costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs. Significant differences are found in cost estimates across countries and regions, and methodological choices also have a great impact on estimation results, thus affecting the reliability of cross-regional comparisons. Summarizing research progress on forest carbon sequestration costs can provide theoretical support for the implementation of forest carbon sequestration projects and market transactions, helping to achieve carbon neutrality goals and promote future sustainable development.
从模型到市场:对森林碳固存成本的系统回顾
森林固碳项目在实现全球碳中和目标和应对气候变化挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用。对于提高计算的准确性,确保项目的经济可行性,促进活跃的碳市场交易,系统地回顾碳封存成本的文献是必不可少的。本文在现有文献的基础上系统回顾了森林固碳成本的主要估算方法和影响因素,并在森林固碳项目全生命周期成本框架下比较了各国的成本估算。研究结果表明:森林固碳成本的核算方法主要有造林成本法、机会成本法、综合成本法和最低碳价法,其中最低碳价法是目前估算成本最全面、最准确的方法。研究结果还表明,森林固碳成本的影响因素表现为“非线性”、“政策-市场二元性”和“自然-人为替代关系”三种核心模式。此外,在整个项目生命周期中,四个主要的成本类别是造林成本、维护成本、交易成本和机会成本。不同国家和地区的成本估算存在显著差异,方法选择对估算结果也有很大影响,从而影响了跨地区比较的可靠性。总结森林固碳成本的研究进展,可以为森林固碳项目的实施和市场交易提供理论支持,有助于实现碳中和目标,促进未来可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信