Smart modeling of oil shale pyrolysis: Impact of feed composition and thermal parameters

IF 6.2 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Mahdi Abdi-Khanghah , Mohadese Abdi-Khanghah , Saeed Zeinali Heris , Somchai Wongwises , Omid Mahian
{"title":"Smart modeling of oil shale pyrolysis: Impact of feed composition and thermal parameters","authors":"Mahdi Abdi-Khanghah ,&nbsp;Mohadese Abdi-Khanghah ,&nbsp;Saeed Zeinali Heris ,&nbsp;Somchai Wongwises ,&nbsp;Omid Mahian","doi":"10.1016/j.jaap.2025.107363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of oil shale resources is gaining global importance due to increasing energy demand. Pyrolysis is the most economical and feasible method for extracting oil from shale, yet its performance is difficult to predict due to complex reaction mechanisms, uncertainties in Arrhenius-type kinetics, and the often-overlooked role of heating rate. This study presents a novel application of artificial intelligence (AI) to predict oil shale pyrolysis behavior. Using elemental composition (C, H, N, O, S wt%), temperature, and heating rate as inputs, AI models were trained to estimate residual solid content after pyrolysis. A dataset of 457 thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) experiments was used, with an 80:20 train-test split. Three AI models—Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM)—were developed for comparison. ANFIS outperformed the others, achieving R² = 0.9706, RMSE = 5.6, and SD = 0.030. Graphical evaluations (residuals, scatter plots, Box-Cox, and cumulative error plots) supported its robustness. Sensitivity analysis based on relevancy factors showed that increased heating rate reduces pyrolysis efficiency, while higher temperature and elemental contents positively influence performance. Temperature was the most significant factor (r = –0.6766), indicating its central role in process optimization. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of AI in modeling oil shale pyrolysis and offers a valuable tool for improving operational strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 107363"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165237025004164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of oil shale resources is gaining global importance due to increasing energy demand. Pyrolysis is the most economical and feasible method for extracting oil from shale, yet its performance is difficult to predict due to complex reaction mechanisms, uncertainties in Arrhenius-type kinetics, and the often-overlooked role of heating rate. This study presents a novel application of artificial intelligence (AI) to predict oil shale pyrolysis behavior. Using elemental composition (C, H, N, O, S wt%), temperature, and heating rate as inputs, AI models were trained to estimate residual solid content after pyrolysis. A dataset of 457 thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) experiments was used, with an 80:20 train-test split. Three AI models—Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM)—were developed for comparison. ANFIS outperformed the others, achieving R² = 0.9706, RMSE = 5.6, and SD = 0.030. Graphical evaluations (residuals, scatter plots, Box-Cox, and cumulative error plots) supported its robustness. Sensitivity analysis based on relevancy factors showed that increased heating rate reduces pyrolysis efficiency, while higher temperature and elemental contents positively influence performance. Temperature was the most significant factor (r = –0.6766), indicating its central role in process optimization. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of AI in modeling oil shale pyrolysis and offers a valuable tool for improving operational strategies.
油页岩热解智能建模:原料组成和热参数的影响
随着能源需求的不断增长,油页岩资源的开发在全球范围内具有越来越重要的意义。热解是页岩中最经济可行的采油方法,但由于反应机理复杂、arrhenius型动力学不确定以及加热速率的影响,其性能难以预测。本研究提出了人工智能(AI)在油页岩热解行为预测中的新应用。使用元素组成(C, H, N, O, S wt%),温度和加热速率作为输入,训练AI模型来估计热解后的残余固体含量。采用457个热重分析(TGA)实验数据集,采用80:20的列车-测试分割。开发了人工神经网络(ANN)、自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)和最小二乘支持向量机(LSSVM)三种人工智能模型进行比较。ANFIS优于其他方法,R²= 0.9706,RMSE = 5.6,SD = 0.030。图形评价(残差、散点图、Box-Cox和累积误差图)支持其稳健性。基于相关因子的敏感性分析表明,升温速率的提高降低了热解效率,而温度和元素含量的升高对热解性能有积极影响。温度是最显著的影响因素(r = -0.6766),表明其在工艺优化中的核心作用。这项工作证明了人工智能在油页岩热解建模中的有效性,并为改进操作策略提供了有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.70%
发文量
340
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (JAAP) is devoted to the publication of papers dealing with innovative applications of pyrolysis processes, the characterization of products related to pyrolysis reactions, and investigations of reaction mechanism. To be considered by JAAP, a manuscript should present significant progress in these topics. The novelty must be satisfactorily argued in the cover letter. A manuscript with a cover letter to the editor not addressing the novelty is likely to be rejected without review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信