Qiao Yang , Fuzhong Wu , Qiqian Wu , Josep Peñuelas , Jordi Sardans , Yan Peng , Zimin Li , Petr Heděnec , Zhijie Li , Kai Yue
{"title":"Global patterns and hierarchical controls of metabolism from headwaters to large rivers","authors":"Qiao Yang , Fuzhong Wu , Qiqian Wu , Josep Peñuelas , Jordi Sardans , Yan Peng , Zimin Li , Petr Heděnec , Zhijie Li , Kai Yue","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metabolic function is a fundamental property of river ecosystems. Identifying the key controlling factors of metabolic processes remains a central challenge in predicting the role that rivers play in global carbon cycle. Here, using 3334 observations [1732 for gross primary productivity (GPP) and 1602 for ecosystem respiration (ER)] collected from 224 published studies, we quantitatively evaluated the patterns and drivers of metabolism in rivers. Results showed that (1) global rivers were predominately heterotrophic across most river scales and biome regions, with GPP ranging from −0.301 to 29.1 g O<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> and ER ranging from −39.0 to 0 g O<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>; (2) GPP increased significantly with river size, whereas ER showed a weak relationship with river size due to the scaling effects of biotic communities; (3) factors governing metabolic processes varied significantly among different river scales, but latitude was a cross-scale regulator in large rivers (Strahler stream order ≥7<sup>th</sup>); (4) headwater stream (1<sup>st</sup>-3<sup>rd</sup> orders) metabolism was dominated controlled by light availability and temperature, while that in intermediate rivers (4<sup>th</sup>-6<sup>th</sup> orders) demonstrated high sensitivity to river morphology, nutrient availability, and anthropogenic pressures; and (5) over the past 30 years (1991–2021), river metabolism exhibited pronounced seasonal variation—peaking in summer—and asynchronous declines in GPP and ER. Our hierarchical regulation framework would optimize the ecological management of water resources and provide critical information for better prediction of global river ecosystem carbon fluxes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"663 ","pages":"Article 134268"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425016087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Metabolic function is a fundamental property of river ecosystems. Identifying the key controlling factors of metabolic processes remains a central challenge in predicting the role that rivers play in global carbon cycle. Here, using 3334 observations [1732 for gross primary productivity (GPP) and 1602 for ecosystem respiration (ER)] collected from 224 published studies, we quantitatively evaluated the patterns and drivers of metabolism in rivers. Results showed that (1) global rivers were predominately heterotrophic across most river scales and biome regions, with GPP ranging from −0.301 to 29.1 g O2 m−2 d−1 and ER ranging from −39.0 to 0 g O2 m−2 d−1; (2) GPP increased significantly with river size, whereas ER showed a weak relationship with river size due to the scaling effects of biotic communities; (3) factors governing metabolic processes varied significantly among different river scales, but latitude was a cross-scale regulator in large rivers (Strahler stream order ≥7th); (4) headwater stream (1st-3rd orders) metabolism was dominated controlled by light availability and temperature, while that in intermediate rivers (4th-6th orders) demonstrated high sensitivity to river morphology, nutrient availability, and anthropogenic pressures; and (5) over the past 30 years (1991–2021), river metabolism exhibited pronounced seasonal variation—peaking in summer—and asynchronous declines in GPP and ER. Our hierarchical regulation framework would optimize the ecological management of water resources and provide critical information for better prediction of global river ecosystem carbon fluxes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.