Degradation mapping in Southeast Asia using a partial soil health index based on physicochemical indicators

IF 5 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Puangrat Kaewlom , Patchimaporn Udomkun , Thidarat Rupngam , Cargele Masso , Aimé J. Messiga , Joachim Müller , Thirasant Boonupara
{"title":"Degradation mapping in Southeast Asia using a partial soil health index based on physicochemical indicators","authors":"Puangrat Kaewlom ,&nbsp;Patchimaporn Udomkun ,&nbsp;Thidarat Rupngam ,&nbsp;Cargele Masso ,&nbsp;Aimé J. Messiga ,&nbsp;Joachim Müller ,&nbsp;Thirasant Boonupara","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessing soil degradation in Southeast Asia (SEA) is challenging because most studies are country-specific and indicator-based, relying on disparate metrics that hinder a regionally integrated view of soil health. To address this gap, a regionally calibrated partial Soil Health Index (pSHI) was developed to integrate widely available physicochemical indicators—soil organic carbon (SOC), bulk density (BD), pH, precipitation, slope, and clay—into a unified framework. A regional dataset assembled via systematic review was modeled using a pedotransfer function (PTF) coupled with Random Forest (RF) to integrate and weight indicators. The final model showed strong validation (R<sup>2</sup> ∼ 0.773; MAE ∼ 0.015; RMSE∼0.029), with clay (70.4 %) and pH (17.2 %) dominating the signal, followed by SOC (4.6 %), precipitation (4.1 %), and slope (2.3 %); BD (1.4 %) was negligible and excluded. Although limited to physicochemical attributes, the pSHI captures broad shifts in soil health rather than isolated changes in single parameters. Across SEA, pSHI values indicate predominantly poor–moderate soil health, with representative ranges: Cambodia 0.44–0.45 (moderate); Malaysia 0.31–0.34, Myanmar 0.35, and Vietnam 0.29–0.41 (poor); and Indonesia 0.27–0.45, Laos 0.33–0.42, the Philippines 0.30–0.45, and Thailand 0.31–0.45 (poor–moderate). The pSHI provides a scalable tool to diagnose degradation, prioritize restoration, and support regional soil-conservation policy; biological indicators can be incorporated as harmonized datasets emerge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 106480"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325006183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing soil degradation in Southeast Asia (SEA) is challenging because most studies are country-specific and indicator-based, relying on disparate metrics that hinder a regionally integrated view of soil health. To address this gap, a regionally calibrated partial Soil Health Index (pSHI) was developed to integrate widely available physicochemical indicators—soil organic carbon (SOC), bulk density (BD), pH, precipitation, slope, and clay—into a unified framework. A regional dataset assembled via systematic review was modeled using a pedotransfer function (PTF) coupled with Random Forest (RF) to integrate and weight indicators. The final model showed strong validation (R2 ∼ 0.773; MAE ∼ 0.015; RMSE∼0.029), with clay (70.4 %) and pH (17.2 %) dominating the signal, followed by SOC (4.6 %), precipitation (4.1 %), and slope (2.3 %); BD (1.4 %) was negligible and excluded. Although limited to physicochemical attributes, the pSHI captures broad shifts in soil health rather than isolated changes in single parameters. Across SEA, pSHI values indicate predominantly poor–moderate soil health, with representative ranges: Cambodia 0.44–0.45 (moderate); Malaysia 0.31–0.34, Myanmar 0.35, and Vietnam 0.29–0.41 (poor); and Indonesia 0.27–0.45, Laos 0.33–0.42, the Philippines 0.30–0.45, and Thailand 0.31–0.45 (poor–moderate). The pSHI provides a scalable tool to diagnose degradation, prioritize restoration, and support regional soil-conservation policy; biological indicators can be incorporated as harmonized datasets emerge.

Abstract Image

基于理化指标的部分土壤健康指数在东南亚的退化制图
评估东南亚(SEA)的土壤退化具有挑战性,因为大多数研究都是针对具体国家和指标的,依赖于不同的指标,阻碍了对土壤健康的区域综合看法。为了解决这一差距,开发了区域校准的部分土壤健康指数(pSHI),将广泛可用的物理化学指标-土壤有机碳(SOC),体积密度(BD), pH,降水,坡度和粘土-整合到一个统一的框架中。通过系统评价收集区域数据集,利用土壤传递函数(PTF)和随机森林(RF)对指标进行整合和权重建模。最终模型显示出较强的有效性(R2 ~ 0.773; MAE ~ 0.015; RMSE ~ 0.029),其中粘土(70.4%)和pH(17.2%)主导信号,其次是SOC(4.6%)、降水(4.1%)和坡度(2.3%);BD(1.4%)可忽略不计,排除在外。虽然局限于物理化学属性,但pSHI捕获了土壤健康的广泛变化,而不是单个参数的孤立变化。在整个东南亚,pSHI值主要表明土壤健康状况为中差,代表性范围为:柬埔寨0.44-0.45(中等);马来西亚0.31-0.34,缅甸0.35,越南0.29-0.41(较差);印度尼西亚0.27-0.45,老挝0.33-0.42,菲律宾0.30-0.45,泰国0.31-0.45(中差)。pSHI提供了一种可扩展的工具来诊断退化,确定修复的优先顺序,并支持区域土壤保持政策;随着统一数据集的出现,可以将生物指标纳入其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信