{"title":"On a pecuniary externality of competitive banking through goods pricing dispersion","authors":"Timothy Kam , Hyungsuk Lee , Junsang Lee , Sam Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study the interaction between banking, endogenous market power with price dispersion in goods markets, and reserve requirement regulation. If the reserve requirement never binds, then the economy is a banking generalization of Head et al. (2012): the addition of banking has no pecuniary externality on goods trades and banking is always welfare improving. If the reserve requirement binds, there is a positive spread between lending and deposit rates. In this empirically-relevant case, there is a pecuniary externality: banking amplifies retail-goods firms’ market power. Credit- and policy-dependent heterogeneity in retail-good markups implies a non-monotonicity in the welfare-improving role of banks. We explain the novel opposing forces at work. Our model also justifies why policymakers should be worried about the nexus between inflation, banking and industry markups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 105112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001429212500162X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We study the interaction between banking, endogenous market power with price dispersion in goods markets, and reserve requirement regulation. If the reserve requirement never binds, then the economy is a banking generalization of Head et al. (2012): the addition of banking has no pecuniary externality on goods trades and banking is always welfare improving. If the reserve requirement binds, there is a positive spread between lending and deposit rates. In this empirically-relevant case, there is a pecuniary externality: banking amplifies retail-goods firms’ market power. Credit- and policy-dependent heterogeneity in retail-good markups implies a non-monotonicity in the welfare-improving role of banks. We explain the novel opposing forces at work. Our model also justifies why policymakers should be worried about the nexus between inflation, banking and industry markups.
期刊介绍:
The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.