Transport services and mobility behavior in the Ruhr Region. An analysis of the potential for system transformation and behavior change from the provider’s perspective

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Kay Kohaupt-Cepera
{"title":"Transport services and mobility behavior in the Ruhr Region. An analysis of the potential for system transformation and behavior change from the provider’s perspective","authors":"Kay Kohaupt-Cepera","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mobility is a key factor in shaping sustainable urban development, yet many regions face challenges in transforming their transportation systems to meet modern demands. Despite advancements in technology and growing awareness of environmental concerns, car usage remains disproportionately high in several metropolitan areas. Understanding the structural characteristics and governance factors influencing mobility systems is crucial for identifying effective pathways for transformation.</div><div>The Ruhr region exemplifies these challenges with its unique metropolitan structure and reliance on cars despite its dense population and extensive public transport network. While research on mobility behavior exists, much of it centers around user perspectives, often neglecting provider-side dynamics and governance levels.</div><div>This article addresses this gap by examining the transformation of the Ruhr region’s transportation system from the perspective of mobility providers and public authorities. Through expert interviews with representatives from these institutions, the study explores potential changes and transformation paths while linking provider-related factors to established behavioral theories. The analysis differentiates between governance levels for the article to offer actionable recommendations for stakeholders.</div><div>From the providers’ perspective, public transportation requires greater flexibility, improved acceptance, and a revision of funding and coordination structures away from mere profit orientation. Surveying and incorporating travelers’ individual needs and contexts into service design could foster acceptance among users. Additionally, integrating sharing and on-demand solutions within a synchronized public transport framework could improve flexibility. These services should not be treated as isolated components but as integral elements of a holistic transformation focused on evolving usage practices within the mobility system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259019822500291X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobility is a key factor in shaping sustainable urban development, yet many regions face challenges in transforming their transportation systems to meet modern demands. Despite advancements in technology and growing awareness of environmental concerns, car usage remains disproportionately high in several metropolitan areas. Understanding the structural characteristics and governance factors influencing mobility systems is crucial for identifying effective pathways for transformation.
The Ruhr region exemplifies these challenges with its unique metropolitan structure and reliance on cars despite its dense population and extensive public transport network. While research on mobility behavior exists, much of it centers around user perspectives, often neglecting provider-side dynamics and governance levels.
This article addresses this gap by examining the transformation of the Ruhr region’s transportation system from the perspective of mobility providers and public authorities. Through expert interviews with representatives from these institutions, the study explores potential changes and transformation paths while linking provider-related factors to established behavioral theories. The analysis differentiates between governance levels for the article to offer actionable recommendations for stakeholders.
From the providers’ perspective, public transportation requires greater flexibility, improved acceptance, and a revision of funding and coordination structures away from mere profit orientation. Surveying and incorporating travelers’ individual needs and contexts into service design could foster acceptance among users. Additionally, integrating sharing and on-demand solutions within a synchronized public transport framework could improve flexibility. These services should not be treated as isolated components but as integral elements of a holistic transformation focused on evolving usage practices within the mobility system.
鲁尔地区的交通服务和出行行为。从提供者的角度分析系统转换和行为改变的可能性
交通是形成可持续城市发展的关键因素,但许多地区在改造交通系统以满足现代需求方面面临挑战。尽管科技进步了,人们对环境问题的意识也越来越强,但在一些大城市,汽车的使用率仍然高得不成比例。了解影响流动系统的结构特征和治理因素对于确定有效的转型途径至关重要。鲁尔地区以其独特的都市结构和对汽车的依赖体现了这些挑战,尽管它的人口密集和广泛的公共交通网络。虽然对移动性行为的研究已经存在,但大部分研究都集中在用户视角上,往往忽略了提供者端动态和治理级别。本文通过从移动提供商和公共当局的角度审视鲁尔地区交通系统的转型,解决了这一差距。通过对这些机构代表的专家访谈,本研究探讨了潜在的变化和转型路径,同时将提供者相关因素与已建立的行为理论联系起来。本文的分析区分了不同的治理级别,以便为涉众提供可操作的建议。从提供者的角度来看,公共交通需要更大的灵活性,提高接受度,并修改资金和协调结构,而不是单纯的利润导向。调查并将旅行者的个人需求和背景融入到服务设计中可以促进用户的接受度。此外,在同步的公共交通框架内整合共享和按需解决方案可以提高灵活性。不应将这些服务视为孤立的组件,而应将其视为关注移动性系统内不断发展的使用实践的整体转型的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信