{"title":"Disparities in NatureScore™ across U.S. public schools: Implications for environmental and socioeconomic equity","authors":"Khadija Ashraf, Kangjae Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impacts of NatureScore™ on educational equity by analyzing its correlation with racial demographics and socio-economic status (SES) across 65,406 United States schools. While previous studies have examined nature access in educational contexts regionally, this study uniquely utilizes a comprehensive national dataset, evaluating NatureScore™ disparities across racial and socio-economic groups in urban and rural public schools. Using a cross-sectional design with data from 2022, the variability in NatureScore™ was analyzed concerning the percentages of students from different racial backgrounds and those participating in free or reduced-price lunch (FRPL) programs. Multiple linear regression and bootstrap ANOVA were conducted to assess these relationships. Results show significant disparities: NatureScores™ are higher in schools with lower percentages of economically disadvantaged students and higher percentages of White students, indicating irregular distribution of nature across the U.S. Because NatureScore™ is calculated from 1-km buffers, our estimates reflect equity in the surrounding outdoor environment rather than indoor spaces or on-campus micro-features (like playgrounds, gardens). In urban areas, the gap between low and high socio-economic status schools can reach up to 25 points on a 0 (deficit) to 100 (utopia) NatureScore™ scale. Rural schools also show a consistent decline in NatureScore™ with increasing levels of economic disadvantage, although the differences are smaller (approximately 2.5–5 points) than those observed in urban schools. These findings highlight the need for integrating environmental quality into educational and health equity frameworks, recommending targeted green-infrastructure and nature-based learning interventions in schools, particularly in schools serving economically disadvantaged and minority communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129063"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003978","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the impacts of NatureScore™ on educational equity by analyzing its correlation with racial demographics and socio-economic status (SES) across 65,406 United States schools. While previous studies have examined nature access in educational contexts regionally, this study uniquely utilizes a comprehensive national dataset, evaluating NatureScore™ disparities across racial and socio-economic groups in urban and rural public schools. Using a cross-sectional design with data from 2022, the variability in NatureScore™ was analyzed concerning the percentages of students from different racial backgrounds and those participating in free or reduced-price lunch (FRPL) programs. Multiple linear regression and bootstrap ANOVA were conducted to assess these relationships. Results show significant disparities: NatureScores™ are higher in schools with lower percentages of economically disadvantaged students and higher percentages of White students, indicating irregular distribution of nature across the U.S. Because NatureScore™ is calculated from 1-km buffers, our estimates reflect equity in the surrounding outdoor environment rather than indoor spaces or on-campus micro-features (like playgrounds, gardens). In urban areas, the gap between low and high socio-economic status schools can reach up to 25 points on a 0 (deficit) to 100 (utopia) NatureScore™ scale. Rural schools also show a consistent decline in NatureScore™ with increasing levels of economic disadvantage, although the differences are smaller (approximately 2.5–5 points) than those observed in urban schools. These findings highlight the need for integrating environmental quality into educational and health equity frameworks, recommending targeted green-infrastructure and nature-based learning interventions in schools, particularly in schools serving economically disadvantaged and minority communities.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.