Pore-Scale Insights into the Contribution of Clays during Low-Salinity Waterflooding in Sandstones

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Edward Andrews, Ann Muggeridge*, Alistair Jones and Samuel Krevor, 
{"title":"Pore-Scale Insights into the Contribution of Clays during Low-Salinity Waterflooding in Sandstones","authors":"Edward Andrews,&nbsp;Ann Muggeridge*,&nbsp;Alistair Jones and Samuel Krevor,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The presence of clay minerals is generally accepted to be a necessary condition for low-salinity flooding to improve oil recovery in sandstones. However, there have been no in situ pore-scale observations that low-salinity brine releases more oil from pores with higher proportions of clay minerals present. In fact, there is a growing body of evidence that significant oil release can occur from quartz and feldspar mineral surfaces during low-salinity flooding. In this work, we use X-ray Micro-CT imaging technology to image unsteady-state tertiary low-salinity waterflooding experiments in Berea, Bunter, and Castlegate sandstone samples. We make the first pore-scale in situ observations of oil release from clay-rich and clay-poor pores during low-salinity flooding in oil-wetting sandstone samples. We find that clay minerals are initially significantly more oil-wetting than other mineral groups in all samples. In the Bunter and Berea samples, we observe a significant wettability alteration during low-salinity flooding for clay minerals and nonclay minerals; however, no significant wettability alteration is observed in either mineral group in the Castlegate sample. In all samples, clay-poor pores contribute significantly more to total oil production during low-salinity waterflooding than clay-rich pores. Clay-rich pores are found to account for only 15, 5, and 3% of total additional recovery in the Berea, Bunter, and Castlegate samples, respectively. We see no evidence that clays dominate the response to low-salinity flooding in any of the samples. This work adds to the growing body of evidence that questions the presence of clays as a necessary condition for a favorable response to low-salinity flooding in sandstones.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 37","pages":"17779–17792"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06254","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of clay minerals is generally accepted to be a necessary condition for low-salinity flooding to improve oil recovery in sandstones. However, there have been no in situ pore-scale observations that low-salinity brine releases more oil from pores with higher proportions of clay minerals present. In fact, there is a growing body of evidence that significant oil release can occur from quartz and feldspar mineral surfaces during low-salinity flooding. In this work, we use X-ray Micro-CT imaging technology to image unsteady-state tertiary low-salinity waterflooding experiments in Berea, Bunter, and Castlegate sandstone samples. We make the first pore-scale in situ observations of oil release from clay-rich and clay-poor pores during low-salinity flooding in oil-wetting sandstone samples. We find that clay minerals are initially significantly more oil-wetting than other mineral groups in all samples. In the Bunter and Berea samples, we observe a significant wettability alteration during low-salinity flooding for clay minerals and nonclay minerals; however, no significant wettability alteration is observed in either mineral group in the Castlegate sample. In all samples, clay-poor pores contribute significantly more to total oil production during low-salinity waterflooding than clay-rich pores. Clay-rich pores are found to account for only 15, 5, and 3% of total additional recovery in the Berea, Bunter, and Castlegate samples, respectively. We see no evidence that clays dominate the response to low-salinity flooding in any of the samples. This work adds to the growing body of evidence that questions the presence of clays as a necessary condition for a favorable response to low-salinity flooding in sandstones.

砂岩低盐度水驱过程中粘土作用的孔隙尺度研究
粘土矿物的存在被普遍认为是低矿化度驱油提高砂岩采收率的必要条件。然而,没有原位孔隙尺度的观察表明,低盐度盐水从黏土矿物比例较高的孔隙中释放出更多的油。事实上,越来越多的证据表明,在低矿化度驱油过程中,石英和长石矿物表面可能会发生显著的石油释放。在这项工作中,我们使用x射线微ct成像技术对Berea、Bunter和Castlegate砂岩样品的非稳态第三系低矿化度水驱实验进行了成像。本文首次在孔隙尺度上对含油砂岩样品低矿化度驱油过程中富泥孔和贫泥孔的原油释放进行了原位观察。我们发现粘土矿物在所有样品中最初明显比其他矿物群更亲油。在Bunter和Berea样品中,我们观察到粘土矿物和非粘土矿物在低盐度驱油过程中的润湿性发生了显著变化;然而,在Castlegate样品的任何矿物组中均未观察到显著的润湿性变化。在所有样品中,低矿化度水驱过程中,贫粘土孔隙对总产油量的贡献明显大于富粘土孔隙。在Berea、Bunter和Castlegate样品中,富粘土孔隙分别只占总额外采收率的15.5%和3%。我们没有看到任何证据表明粘土在任何样品中对低盐度洪水的反应中起主导作用。这项工作增加了越来越多的证据,这些证据质疑粘土的存在是否是砂岩中低盐度水淹的有利反应的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信