A Review of the Evidence of the Toxicity of Chemical Substances Included in the European Union Ambient Air Quality and Drinking Water Directives: Perspectives for Health Impact Assessments
Hans Orru*, Wasif Raza, Francesco Forastiere, Joseph Spadaro, Henrik Olstrup, Nataša Dragic, Ivana Radic, Sanja Harhaji, Sanja Bijelovic, Lars Modig, Mike Holland, Sandrine Andres, Adrien Troise, Antoine Guion, Alicia Gressent, Jörg Schullehner and Johan Nilsson Sommar,
{"title":"A Review of the Evidence of the Toxicity of Chemical Substances Included in the European Union Ambient Air Quality and Drinking Water Directives: Perspectives for Health Impact Assessments","authors":"Hans Orru*, Wasif Raza, Francesco Forastiere, Joseph Spadaro, Henrik Olstrup, Nataša Dragic, Ivana Radic, Sanja Harhaji, Sanja Bijelovic, Lars Modig, Mike Holland, Sandrine Andres, Adrien Troise, Antoine Guion, Alicia Gressent, Jörg Schullehner and Johan Nilsson Sommar, ","doi":"10.1021/envhealth.4c00277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The European Union (EU) Ambient Air Quality Directive (AAQD) and Drinking Water Directive (DWD) are aimed at maintaining and improving air quality and ensuring high standards for potable water across the EU. Besides several other indicators, the AAQD and DWD consist of chemical parameters (substances or substance groups) that are regulated within this framework. All the substances are associated with various health outcomes, and many of them are classified as carcinogenic or probably/possibly carcinogenic with causal links. To quantify the health burden of the chemical substances included in the AAQD and DWD, we need information regarding population exposure, current baseline mortality/morbidity rates in the populations, and exposure–response functions (ERFs) or unit risks (URs) from previous epidemiological studies. During this study, we analyzed the availability of ERFs or URs and discussed their applicability in health impact assessments (HIAs). From the HIA perspective, ERFs─in terms of relative risk (RR), standardized mortality ratio (SMR), odds ratio (OR), or UR data─were available for many of the analyzed substances. However, for some substances such as acrylamide, antimony, boron, chlorate and chlorite, copper, microcystin-LR, and selenium, no risk measures could be identified. The aim of this study is to derive ERFs, which will allow HIAs for a larger number of chemicals when exposure data and baseline mortality/morbidity data are available. Currently, HIAs have largely focused only on main ambient pollutants such as particulate matter (PM<sub>10</sub>), fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>X</sub>), and ozone (O<sub>3</sub>). In contrast, health risks related to exposure to chemicals are much more diverse, and the health burdens should be quantified to a much greater extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":29795,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":"3 9","pages":"970–997"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/envhealth.4c00277","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.4c00277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The European Union (EU) Ambient Air Quality Directive (AAQD) and Drinking Water Directive (DWD) are aimed at maintaining and improving air quality and ensuring high standards for potable water across the EU. Besides several other indicators, the AAQD and DWD consist of chemical parameters (substances or substance groups) that are regulated within this framework. All the substances are associated with various health outcomes, and many of them are classified as carcinogenic or probably/possibly carcinogenic with causal links. To quantify the health burden of the chemical substances included in the AAQD and DWD, we need information regarding population exposure, current baseline mortality/morbidity rates in the populations, and exposure–response functions (ERFs) or unit risks (URs) from previous epidemiological studies. During this study, we analyzed the availability of ERFs or URs and discussed their applicability in health impact assessments (HIAs). From the HIA perspective, ERFs─in terms of relative risk (RR), standardized mortality ratio (SMR), odds ratio (OR), or UR data─were available for many of the analyzed substances. However, for some substances such as acrylamide, antimony, boron, chlorate and chlorite, copper, microcystin-LR, and selenium, no risk measures could be identified. The aim of this study is to derive ERFs, which will allow HIAs for a larger number of chemicals when exposure data and baseline mortality/morbidity data are available. Currently, HIAs have largely focused only on main ambient pollutants such as particulate matter (PM10), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), nitrogen oxides (NOX), and ozone (O3). In contrast, health risks related to exposure to chemicals are much more diverse, and the health burdens should be quantified to a much greater extent.
期刊介绍:
Environment & Health a peer-reviewed open access journal is committed to exploring the relationship between the environment and human health.As a premier journal for multidisciplinary research Environment & Health reports the health consequences for individuals and communities of changing and hazardous environmental factors. In supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals the journal aims to help formulate policies to create a healthier world.Topics of interest include but are not limited to:Air water and soil pollutionExposomicsEnvironmental epidemiologyInnovative analytical methodology and instrumentation (multi-omics non-target analysis effect-directed analysis high-throughput screening etc.)Environmental toxicology (endocrine disrupting effect neurotoxicity alternative toxicology computational toxicology epigenetic toxicology etc.)Environmental microbiology pathogen and environmental transmission mechanisms of diseasesEnvironmental modeling bioinformatics and artificial intelligenceEmerging contaminants (including plastics engineered nanomaterials etc.)Climate change and related health effectHealth impacts of energy evolution and carbon neutralizationFood and drinking water safetyOccupational exposure and medicineInnovations in environmental technologies for better healthPolicies and international relations concerned with environmental health