Water use, yield, and root growth characteristics of safflower in surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems under water-saving irrigation strategies

IF 6.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Ameneh Karizi , Tooraj Honar , Seyed Hamid Ahmadi , Ali Reza Sepaskhah , Bahram Heidari , Ali Akbar Kamgar-Haghighi
{"title":"Water use, yield, and root growth characteristics of safflower in surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems under water-saving irrigation strategies","authors":"Ameneh Karizi ,&nbsp;Tooraj Honar ,&nbsp;Seyed Hamid Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Ali Reza Sepaskhah ,&nbsp;Bahram Heidari ,&nbsp;Ali Akbar Kamgar-Haghighi","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implementing water-saving irrigation techniques and drought-tolerant crops is essential for sustainable agriculture under drought and water scarcity. This study evaluated the effects of three irrigation strategies of full irrigation (FI), partial root-zone drying (PRD) at 70 % FI, and conventional deficit irrigation (DI) at 70 % FI, three lateral spacings (20 cm, 40 cm, 60 cm), and two drip irrigation systems (surface drip (SD) and subsurface drip (SSD)) on water use, crop water productivity, yield, and root growth of spring safflower (cv. Goldasht) in a semi-arid region in Iran over two growing seasons. The split–split plot experiment revealed that FI with 20 cm spacing achieved the highest seed yield. PRD and DI saved 25 % of irrigation water, with mean seed yield reductions of 9.4 % and 13.6 %, respectively, compared to FI. Increasing lateral spacing to 40 cm and 60 cm reduced yield by 4.5 % and 24.3 %. Root growth was positively correlated with seed yield; higher root length density (RLD) and root mass density (RMD) were observed where soil water content was greater. Water-saving treatments enhanced specific root length (SRL). SSD improved crop water productivity compared to SD. Maximum <em>WP</em><sub><em>CET</em></sub>, <em>WP</em><sub><em>irrig</em></sub>, and <em>WP</em><sub><em>irrig+rain</em></sub> were achieved with PRD under SSD at 20 cm and 40 cm spacings, while the lowest values were found under FI with SD at 60 cm spacing. Yield response factor (K<sub>y</sub>) and yield sensitivity index (λ<sub>i</sub>) analyses indicated that 20 cm lateral spacing enhanced drought tolerance. We conclude that SSD with 40 cm spacing under PRD at 70 % FI is an effective alternative for water-scarce regions, balancing water savings with minimal yield loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"319 ","pages":"Article 109829"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005438","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementing water-saving irrigation techniques and drought-tolerant crops is essential for sustainable agriculture under drought and water scarcity. This study evaluated the effects of three irrigation strategies of full irrigation (FI), partial root-zone drying (PRD) at 70 % FI, and conventional deficit irrigation (DI) at 70 % FI, three lateral spacings (20 cm, 40 cm, 60 cm), and two drip irrigation systems (surface drip (SD) and subsurface drip (SSD)) on water use, crop water productivity, yield, and root growth of spring safflower (cv. Goldasht) in a semi-arid region in Iran over two growing seasons. The split–split plot experiment revealed that FI with 20 cm spacing achieved the highest seed yield. PRD and DI saved 25 % of irrigation water, with mean seed yield reductions of 9.4 % and 13.6 %, respectively, compared to FI. Increasing lateral spacing to 40 cm and 60 cm reduced yield by 4.5 % and 24.3 %. Root growth was positively correlated with seed yield; higher root length density (RLD) and root mass density (RMD) were observed where soil water content was greater. Water-saving treatments enhanced specific root length (SRL). SSD improved crop water productivity compared to SD. Maximum WPCET, WPirrig, and WPirrig+rain were achieved with PRD under SSD at 20 cm and 40 cm spacings, while the lowest values were found under FI with SD at 60 cm spacing. Yield response factor (Ky) and yield sensitivity index (λi) analyses indicated that 20 cm lateral spacing enhanced drought tolerance. We conclude that SSD with 40 cm spacing under PRD at 70 % FI is an effective alternative for water-scarce regions, balancing water savings with minimal yield loss.
节水灌溉策略下地表和地下滴灌红花的水分利用、产量和根系生长特性
实施节水灌溉技术和培育耐旱作物是干旱缺水条件下农业可持续发展的必要条件。本研究评估了三种灌溉策略:全灌(FI)、部分根区干燥(PRD)(70% % FI)和常规亏缺灌溉(DI)(70% % FI)、三种横向间距(20 cm、40 cm、60 cm)和两种滴灌系统(地表滴灌(SD)和地下滴灌(SSD))对春季红花的水分利用、作物水分生产力、产量和根系生长的影响。在伊朗半干旱地区的两个生长季节。劈裂小区试验表明,间距为20 cm的FI种子产量最高。PRD和DI比FI节水25 %,平均种子产量分别降低9.4 %和13.6 %。将横向间距增加到40 cm和60 cm,产量分别降低4.5% %和24.3% %。根系生长与种子产量呈正相关;土壤含水量越高,根长密度和根质量密度越高。节水处理提高了比根长(SRL)。与SD相比,SSD提高了作物水分生产力。WPCET、WPirrig和WPirrig+雨在间隔为20 cm和40 cm的SSD条件下PRD最大,而在间隔为60 cm的SD条件下FI最小。产量响应因子(Ky)和产量敏感性指数(λi)分析表明,20 cm侧间距提高了水稻的耐旱性。我们得出的结论是,在70% % FI的PRD下,40 cm间距的SSD是缺水地区的有效替代方案,可以在节水和最小产量损失之间取得平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信