Microbial resource limitation in soil aggregates effects soil organic carbon storage under straw incorporation

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Naiwen Zhang , Guangren Zheng , Xiaozeng Han , Xu Chen , Xinchun Lu , Jun Yan , Wenxiu Zou
{"title":"Microbial resource limitation in soil aggregates effects soil organic carbon storage under straw incorporation","authors":"Naiwen Zhang ,&nbsp;Guangren Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiaozeng Han ,&nbsp;Xu Chen ,&nbsp;Xinchun Lu ,&nbsp;Jun Yan ,&nbsp;Wenxiu Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil aggregates play a crucial role in microbially mediated soil organic carbon (SOC) cycling. However, the microbial constraints governing SOC storage under straw incorporation at different soil aggregation levels remain unclear. To address this, a 4-year field experiment was conducted in northeast China using a completely randomized block design with three replicates: conventional tillage (15 cm depth) without straw (CT) and with straw (10,000 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>, SCT), as well as deep tillage (35 cm depth) without straw (DT) and with straw (10,000 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>, SDT). Soil aggregates were fractionated into &gt; 2 mm, 2–0.25 mm, and &lt; 0.25 mm size classes. Compared to CT, SCT, and DT, the SOC storage under SDT increased significantly by 4.45 %, 1.71 %, 4.64 %, respectively, across the 0–35 cm soil depth. Straw incorporation (SCT vs. CT) elevated the proportion of &gt; 2 mm and 2–0.25 mm aggregates, along with soil organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium nutrient contents, and microbial biomass within the 0–15 cm layer. Similarly, SDT (vs. DT) enhanced these parameters in both the 0–15 cm and 15–35 cm layers. Straw addition (SCT vs. CT, SDT vs. DT) also increased the microbial diversity (Actinobacteriota and Chloroflexi in the 0–15 cm layer), and complexity of microbial co-occurrence networks in 2–0.25 mm and &lt; 0.25 mm aggregates while alleviating microbial carbon (by 0.93–2.29 %) and phosphorus (by 0.80–2.94 %) limitations. Partial least squares path modeling indicated that the 2–0.25 mm aggregate fraction was the primary driver of SOC storage enhancement under straw incorporation, with bacterial and fungal co-occurrence network relationships collectively mitigating microbial resource (carbon and phosphorus) limitations in this key size class. Therefore, these findings underscore the importance of microbial regulation in SOC dynamics at the aggregate level, providing insights for field management strategies aimed at improving soil quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 106874"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725004283","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil aggregates play a crucial role in microbially mediated soil organic carbon (SOC) cycling. However, the microbial constraints governing SOC storage under straw incorporation at different soil aggregation levels remain unclear. To address this, a 4-year field experiment was conducted in northeast China using a completely randomized block design with three replicates: conventional tillage (15 cm depth) without straw (CT) and with straw (10,000 kg ha−1 y−1, SCT), as well as deep tillage (35 cm depth) without straw (DT) and with straw (10,000 kg ha−1 y−1, SDT). Soil aggregates were fractionated into > 2 mm, 2–0.25 mm, and < 0.25 mm size classes. Compared to CT, SCT, and DT, the SOC storage under SDT increased significantly by 4.45 %, 1.71 %, 4.64 %, respectively, across the 0–35 cm soil depth. Straw incorporation (SCT vs. CT) elevated the proportion of > 2 mm and 2–0.25 mm aggregates, along with soil organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium nutrient contents, and microbial biomass within the 0–15 cm layer. Similarly, SDT (vs. DT) enhanced these parameters in both the 0–15 cm and 15–35 cm layers. Straw addition (SCT vs. CT, SDT vs. DT) also increased the microbial diversity (Actinobacteriota and Chloroflexi in the 0–15 cm layer), and complexity of microbial co-occurrence networks in 2–0.25 mm and < 0.25 mm aggregates while alleviating microbial carbon (by 0.93–2.29 %) and phosphorus (by 0.80–2.94 %) limitations. Partial least squares path modeling indicated that the 2–0.25 mm aggregate fraction was the primary driver of SOC storage enhancement under straw incorporation, with bacterial and fungal co-occurrence network relationships collectively mitigating microbial resource (carbon and phosphorus) limitations in this key size class. Therefore, these findings underscore the importance of microbial regulation in SOC dynamics at the aggregate level, providing insights for field management strategies aimed at improving soil quality.
秸秆还田条件下土壤团聚体微生物资源限制影响土壤有机碳储量
土壤团聚体在微生物介导的土壤有机碳循环中起着至关重要的作用。然而,在不同土壤团聚体水平下,秸秆还田对有机碳储量的微生物限制尚不清楚。为了解决这一问题,在中国东北地区进行了为期4年的田间试验,采用完全随机区组设计,共3个重复:常规耕作(15 cm深度)无秸秆(CT)和秸秆(10,000 kg ha−1 y−1,SCT),以及深耕(35 cm深度)无秸秆(DT)和秸秆(10,000 kg ha−1 y−1,SDT)。土壤团聚体被划分为>; 2 mm、2 - 0.25 mm和<; 0.25 mm粒径级。在0 ~ 35 cm土壤深度上,与CT、SCT和DT相比,SDT处理下土壤有机碳储量分别显著增加4.45 %、1.71 %和4.64 %。秸秆还田(SCT vs CT)提高了>; 2 mm和2 - 0.25 mm团聚体的比例,以及0-15 cm层内土壤有机碳、氮、磷、钾养分含量和微生物生物量。同样,SDT(相对于DT)在0-15 cm和15-35 cm层都增强了这些参数。秸秆添加(SCT vs CT, SDT vs DT)也增加了微生物多样性(0-15 cm层的放线菌群和氯氟菌群),以及2-0.25 mm和 ;0.25 mm团聚体中微生物共生网络的复杂性,同时减轻了微生物碳(0.93-2.29 %)和磷(0.80-2.94 %)的限制。偏最小二乘路径模型表明,2-0.25 mm团聚体分数是秸秆还还期土壤有机碳储量增加的主要驱动因素,细菌和真菌共存在的网络关系共同缓解了微生物资源(碳和磷)在这一关键粒径类别中的限制。因此,这些发现强调了微生物在总体水平上对有机碳动态的调节的重要性,为旨在改善土壤质量的田间管理策略提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信