Pursuing municipal land use interests in densifying cities: How municipalities strategically apply land value capture contracting to trade-off economic value of density for other gains

IF 4.1 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Pauliina Krigsholm, Tuulia Puustinen, Heidi Falkenbach
{"title":"Pursuing municipal land use interests in densifying cities: How municipalities strategically apply land value capture contracting to trade-off economic value of density for other gains","authors":"Pauliina Krigsholm, Tuulia Puustinen, Heidi Falkenbach","doi":"10.1177/00420980251365014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Municipalities both create and capture the economic value of density through planning and other land market interventions. In theory, this position allows them to trade-off economic advantages of densification for other gains that serve public interest, such as social housing production and resource efficiency. However, despite broad scholarship on land value capture, there is limited understanding of how municipalities strategically apply value capture instruments to pursue particular land use interests in densifying cities. We investigate, in a qualitative study of 14 large and mid-sized Finnish municipalities, what the land use interests are that municipalities motivate densification with, and how they tailor the use of one type of flexible value capture instrument – a contract negotiated between the municipality and the landowner prior to the approval of a plan that allows densification – to trade-off land value increase for certain interests. Our analysis shows that municipalities’ densification-related land use interests are heterogeneous and marked by the political realities of urban sustainability. We document that the value capture contracting practices reflect the interest plurality, as municipalities trade-off land value increase both to specific social and environmental objectives and to less clearly expressed, often financial, interests. The article deepens understanding of municipalities as strategic actors of densification and sheds light on the explicit and implicit trade-offing practices embedded in the governance processes of densification.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251365014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Municipalities both create and capture the economic value of density through planning and other land market interventions. In theory, this position allows them to trade-off economic advantages of densification for other gains that serve public interest, such as social housing production and resource efficiency. However, despite broad scholarship on land value capture, there is limited understanding of how municipalities strategically apply value capture instruments to pursue particular land use interests in densifying cities. We investigate, in a qualitative study of 14 large and mid-sized Finnish municipalities, what the land use interests are that municipalities motivate densification with, and how they tailor the use of one type of flexible value capture instrument – a contract negotiated between the municipality and the landowner prior to the approval of a plan that allows densification – to trade-off land value increase for certain interests. Our analysis shows that municipalities’ densification-related land use interests are heterogeneous and marked by the political realities of urban sustainability. We document that the value capture contracting practices reflect the interest plurality, as municipalities trade-off land value increase both to specific social and environmental objectives and to less clearly expressed, often financial, interests. The article deepens understanding of municipalities as strategic actors of densification and sheds light on the explicit and implicit trade-offing practices embedded in the governance processes of densification.
在人口密集的城市中追求市政土地使用利益:市政当局如何策略性地应用土地价值获取合同来权衡密度的经济价值以获得其他收益
市政当局通过规划和其他土地市场干预来创造和获取密度的经济价值。从理论上讲,这种立场允许他们权衡高密度化的经济优势,以换取其他符合公共利益的收益,如社会住房生产和资源效率。然而,尽管在土地价值获取方面有广泛的学术研究,但对市政当局如何战略性地应用价值获取工具在人口密集的城市中追求特定的土地使用利益的理解有限。在对芬兰14个大中型城市的定性研究中,我们调查了市政当局激励高密度化的土地使用利益是什么,以及他们如何定制一种灵活的价值获取工具的使用-市政当局与土地所有者在批准允许高密度化的计划之前谈判的合同-为了某些利益而权衡土地价值增加。我们的分析表明,市政当局与密度相关的土地利用利益是异质的,并以城市可持续性的政治现实为特征。我们的文献表明,价值获取合同实践反映了利益多元化,因为市政当局权衡土地价值增加,既有利于特定的社会和环境目标,也有利于表达不太明确的利益,通常是经济利益。本文加深了对市政当局作为致密化战略行为体的理解,并阐明了在致密化治理过程中嵌入的显性和隐性权衡实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信