Cristina Gómez Fernández,Rea Mitsigiorgi,Micaela Fochini,Angel Leung,Cristina Fernández Pérez,Kypros H Nicolaides
{"title":"Continuous glucose monitoring: criteria for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with clinical obesity after gestational diabetes.","authors":"Cristina Gómez Fernández,Rea Mitsigiorgi,Micaela Fochini,Angel Leung,Cristina Fernández Pérez,Kypros H Nicolaides","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.09.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo compare Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) to American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria, in the postpartum period in women who had developed gestational diabetes (GDM) during their recent pregnancy, for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (DMT2) complicated by clinical obesity.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nBetween September 2023-April 2025, we conducted a multiproposal cohort study at King's College Hospital, London, UK. We invited consecutive women with and without GDM at 5-months postpartum. GDM patients were also invited for a 1-year follow-up clinic. Blinded CGM (Dexcom G7; Dexcom, San Diego, CA) was performed for 10 days. The primary outcome was T2DM with clinical obesity, defined by first, the ADA criteria (HbA1c ≥6.5%, FPG ≥126 mg/dL, or 2-hour OGTT of ≥200 mg/dL), and second, CGM average glucose ≥131.5 mg/dL, which is the mean + 2SD of our non-GDM group. Clinical obesity was defined by the recently published The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission, as excess body fat directly affecting the function of organs and tissues.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe examined 1,118 women, including 276 (24.7%) non-GDM controls at 5- months postpartum, 539 (48.2%) post-GDM at 5-months postpartum and 303 (27.1%) post-GDM at 1-year postpartum. In the non-GDM group the mean + 2SDs average glucose was ≥131.5 mg/dL. At 5-months postpartum in the GDM group, CGM classified 8.9% (48/539) women as DMT2 with clinical obesity and the respective value by the ADA criteria was 4.3% (23/539). Women diagnosed by CGM but not the ADA criteria (n=35) had a worse cardiometabolic profile than those diagnosed by the ADA criteria alone (n=10). Out of the 35 additional cases, classified only by CGM, 26 attended to the 1-year postnatal clinic and all still had an average glucose ≥131.5 mg/dL measured by CGM and abnormal cardiometabolic profile.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPostpartum follow-up in women who had GDM should not only focus on dysglycemia but on their cardiometabolic profile. In this respect, CGM is superior to ADA criteria for diagnosis of DMT2 with clinical obesity.","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.09.031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) to American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria, in the postpartum period in women who had developed gestational diabetes (GDM) during their recent pregnancy, for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (DMT2) complicated by clinical obesity.
STUDY DESIGN
Between September 2023-April 2025, we conducted a multiproposal cohort study at King's College Hospital, London, UK. We invited consecutive women with and without GDM at 5-months postpartum. GDM patients were also invited for a 1-year follow-up clinic. Blinded CGM (Dexcom G7; Dexcom, San Diego, CA) was performed for 10 days. The primary outcome was T2DM with clinical obesity, defined by first, the ADA criteria (HbA1c ≥6.5%, FPG ≥126 mg/dL, or 2-hour OGTT of ≥200 mg/dL), and second, CGM average glucose ≥131.5 mg/dL, which is the mean + 2SD of our non-GDM group. Clinical obesity was defined by the recently published The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission, as excess body fat directly affecting the function of organs and tissues.
RESULTS
We examined 1,118 women, including 276 (24.7%) non-GDM controls at 5- months postpartum, 539 (48.2%) post-GDM at 5-months postpartum and 303 (27.1%) post-GDM at 1-year postpartum. In the non-GDM group the mean + 2SDs average glucose was ≥131.5 mg/dL. At 5-months postpartum in the GDM group, CGM classified 8.9% (48/539) women as DMT2 with clinical obesity and the respective value by the ADA criteria was 4.3% (23/539). Women diagnosed by CGM but not the ADA criteria (n=35) had a worse cardiometabolic profile than those diagnosed by the ADA criteria alone (n=10). Out of the 35 additional cases, classified only by CGM, 26 attended to the 1-year postnatal clinic and all still had an average glucose ≥131.5 mg/dL measured by CGM and abnormal cardiometabolic profile.
CONCLUSIONS
Postpartum follow-up in women who had GDM should not only focus on dysglycemia but on their cardiometabolic profile. In this respect, CGM is superior to ADA criteria for diagnosis of DMT2 with clinical obesity.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.