Maximilian Bruchmann, Sebastian Schindler, Pia Breitwieser, Lynn Tilly, Jens Boelte, Torge Dellert, Thomas Straube
{"title":"Nonconscious processing of fearful and neutral faces modulates the N170.","authors":"Maximilian Bruchmann, Sebastian Schindler, Pia Breitwieser, Lynn Tilly, Jens Boelte, Torge Dellert, Thomas Straube","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsaf095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prioritised processing of fearful compared to neutral faces, is reflected in event-related potentials (ERPs), but the extent to which fearful faces enhance ERPs when not consciously perceived remains debated. The N170 component is considered a key marker for nonconscious processing of fearful faces. In this pre-registered study (N = 62), we tested whether the P1, N170, and early posterior negativity (EPN) differentiate between fearful faces, neutral faces, and non-facial control stimuli. Consciousness was manipulated using backward-masked stimuli presented for 17 ms, with masks following immediately or after 200 ms. Participants rated their subjective perception on a perceptual awareness scale in each trial. We found strong evidence for an increased N170 response to nonconscious fearful versus neutral faces and for N170 differences between nonconscious faces and non-facial stimuli. No significant effects were found for P1 or EPN amplitudes in nonconscious conditions, although exploratory analyses suggest a possible P1 difference between faces and non-faces. These findings support that nonconscious emotion and face processing are detectable in early neural responses, albeit much weaker than during conscious perception. Future research should examine the influence of low-level stimulus differences and experimental conditions on these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prioritised processing of fearful compared to neutral faces, is reflected in event-related potentials (ERPs), but the extent to which fearful faces enhance ERPs when not consciously perceived remains debated. The N170 component is considered a key marker for nonconscious processing of fearful faces. In this pre-registered study (N = 62), we tested whether the P1, N170, and early posterior negativity (EPN) differentiate between fearful faces, neutral faces, and non-facial control stimuli. Consciousness was manipulated using backward-masked stimuli presented for 17 ms, with masks following immediately or after 200 ms. Participants rated their subjective perception on a perceptual awareness scale in each trial. We found strong evidence for an increased N170 response to nonconscious fearful versus neutral faces and for N170 differences between nonconscious faces and non-facial stimuli. No significant effects were found for P1 or EPN amplitudes in nonconscious conditions, although exploratory analyses suggest a possible P1 difference between faces and non-faces. These findings support that nonconscious emotion and face processing are detectable in early neural responses, albeit much weaker than during conscious perception. Future research should examine the influence of low-level stimulus differences and experimental conditions on these results.