Nonconscious processing of fearful and neutral faces modulates the N170.

IF 3.1
Maximilian Bruchmann, Sebastian Schindler, Pia Breitwieser, Lynn Tilly, Jens Boelte, Torge Dellert, Thomas Straube
{"title":"Nonconscious processing of fearful and neutral faces modulates the N170.","authors":"Maximilian Bruchmann, Sebastian Schindler, Pia Breitwieser, Lynn Tilly, Jens Boelte, Torge Dellert, Thomas Straube","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsaf095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prioritised processing of fearful compared to neutral faces, is reflected in event-related potentials (ERPs), but the extent to which fearful faces enhance ERPs when not consciously perceived remains debated. The N170 component is considered a key marker for nonconscious processing of fearful faces. In this pre-registered study (N = 62), we tested whether the P1, N170, and early posterior negativity (EPN) differentiate between fearful faces, neutral faces, and non-facial control stimuli. Consciousness was manipulated using backward-masked stimuli presented for 17 ms, with masks following immediately or after 200 ms. Participants rated their subjective perception on a perceptual awareness scale in each trial. We found strong evidence for an increased N170 response to nonconscious fearful versus neutral faces and for N170 differences between nonconscious faces and non-facial stimuli. No significant effects were found for P1 or EPN amplitudes in nonconscious conditions, although exploratory analyses suggest a possible P1 difference between faces and non-faces. These findings support that nonconscious emotion and face processing are detectable in early neural responses, albeit much weaker than during conscious perception. Future research should examine the influence of low-level stimulus differences and experimental conditions on these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prioritised processing of fearful compared to neutral faces, is reflected in event-related potentials (ERPs), but the extent to which fearful faces enhance ERPs when not consciously perceived remains debated. The N170 component is considered a key marker for nonconscious processing of fearful faces. In this pre-registered study (N = 62), we tested whether the P1, N170, and early posterior negativity (EPN) differentiate between fearful faces, neutral faces, and non-facial control stimuli. Consciousness was manipulated using backward-masked stimuli presented for 17 ms, with masks following immediately or after 200 ms. Participants rated their subjective perception on a perceptual awareness scale in each trial. We found strong evidence for an increased N170 response to nonconscious fearful versus neutral faces and for N170 differences between nonconscious faces and non-facial stimuli. No significant effects were found for P1 or EPN amplitudes in nonconscious conditions, although exploratory analyses suggest a possible P1 difference between faces and non-faces. These findings support that nonconscious emotion and face processing are detectable in early neural responses, albeit much weaker than during conscious perception. Future research should examine the influence of low-level stimulus differences and experimental conditions on these results.

恐惧和中性面孔的无意识加工调节N170。
与中性面孔相比,恐惧面孔的优先加工反映在事件相关电位(erp)中,但恐惧面孔在无意识感知时增强erp的程度仍存在争议。N170成分被认为是无意识处理恐惧面孔的关键标志。在这项预先登记的研究中(N = 62),我们测试了P1、N170和早期后向负性(EPN)是否能区分恐惧面孔、中性面孔和非面部控制刺激。通过17毫秒的后掩模刺激来操纵意识,然后立即或在200毫秒后进行掩模。在每次试验中,参与者对他们的主观感知进行了知觉意识量表评分。我们发现了强有力的证据,证明对无意识的恐惧面孔和中性面孔的N170反应增加,以及无意识面孔和非面部刺激之间的N170差异。尽管探索性分析表明,面孔和非面孔之间可能存在P1差异,但在无意识状态下,P1或EPN振幅没有明显影响。这些发现支持了无意识情绪和面部处理在早期神经反应中是可检测到的,尽管比有意识感知时弱得多。未来的研究应进一步考察低水平刺激差异和实验条件对这些结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信